Short Staffed: An Epidemic

I have only been a nurse for a couple years and in that time I have found one issue that unites all nurses: a deep loathing for an under-staffed unit. We’ve all experienced it, we all hate it. So how does it keep happening? To understand the how, we must start with the what. Furthermore, to find effective solutions, we must start with the driving causes. Nurses General Nursing Article

Updated:  

Talk to any nurse and they will have something to say about the staffing at their hospital or facility. More often than not, that something will be an unflattering depiction best summed up with three words: stretched too thin. Additionally, the COVID 19 pandemic, like a flare up of a chronic disease, has only exacerbated the issue. While the problems addressed here can be frustrating, the goal is to rationally examine the causes of under-staffed hospital units in order to then identify potential solutions.

The Problem: Defining Short Staffing

What is short staffing? That depends primarily on the defined nurse-to-patient ratios in each hospital and on each unit. Ask any hospital administrator and any nurse at the same hospital to describe the safe, ideal nurse-to-patient ratio on a given unit and they will be give completely different answers. Why is this? One likely reason is the perspective and roles of each side varies greatly. An administrator considers a completely different set of criteria than a nurse would for the same problem.

The Fix

If nurse-to-patient ratios are the foundation for safe, effective patient care then coming to an agreement on what those ratios should be is paramount. This requires open, honest communication between clinicians and administrators alike. Clearly defined and agreed upon criteria for what adequate staffing on each unit looks like gives everyone a solid foundation with which to start. Nurses are critical to helping define these standards in order to ensure that expectations are realistic.

The Problem: Accounting for Census Changes

There is no question that patient censuses can fluctuate dramatically in short periods of time. We've all left a shift with adequate staffing only to come back 12 hours later to twice the patients and half the staff. These variabilities are difficult to predict, although not impossible to prepare for.

While floating nurses to other units is a commonly used solution, it is a temporary fix and not always seen favorably with floor nurses. Why is floating such a dreaded event? There are many perspectives and reasons although most of these boil down to one common element- the unknown.

On any given shift, there is a lot a nurse can know ahead of time and a lot they cannot. We can know our units- where the supply room or code cart is or the policy for various unit specific procedures and processes, on the other hand we can't know our patients, their conditions, or what may happen over the course of a shift until we are there. Floating to new units takes away the piece of the shift we can know.

The Fix

One option is to give nurses to chance to choose two separate units to work on and then provide full orientations to both units. Allowing nurses the choice of an extra unit gives them some element of control, additionally the orientation gives them the chance to be more comfortable and therefore safe on the unit. Furthermore, this would have the added benefit of reducing potential burn out from being in are place too long.

Another option is to hire nurses specifically as float/pool nurses. Setting the expectation at the time of hire for their role and work expectations will allow the hospital and nurse alike to find and fill roles that fit both parties.

The Problem: Nursing Burn Out and Turn Over

It's a true "chicken or the egg" type question: does short staffing cause nurse burn out or does nurse burn out cause short staffing? There are good arguments for either side, however ultimately addressing both issues is crucial.

The Fix

Hospital administrators have many parameters they use to measure their hospital's success. There are internal considerations such as patient satisfaction surveys and even employee surveys as well as external influences such as various accreditations that can elevate a hospital's standing. Including safe nurse-to-patient staffing ratios as a unit of measurement for success and then getting "dinged" every time a unit operates without appropriate staffing aligns nursing priorities with administration priorities.

This alignment of goals puts everyone on the same page. Which, in turn, helps nurses feel protected by their hospitals leading to a reduction in nurse turn over. All in all, it is mutually beneficial to ensure safe nurse-to-patient ratios.

The Best Chance for Change?

While short nurse staffing can be difficult problem to address, it is not impossible manage. Ultimately, the best chance for change has everyone working towards the same goals: safe, effective, compassionate care for our patients.

What are some of the issues you've found that contribute to under-staffing at your hospital?

What are some possible solutions?

23 hours ago, glasgow3 said:

Mandatory minimum staffing ratios with significant financial penalties for failing to adhere to those ratios at all times.....this is the ONLY answer. Anything short of that is a waste of everyone's time.

Agree 1000000%. I love the idea of training on two different units, specific pool float nurses etc, but without those mandatory radios.. it’s all useless. I also think hospitals should pretty much double their tech count as well. Especially for med surg and telemetry floors. It would free up the nurses to really be able to focus on safe and effective patient care 

15 hours ago, CommunityRNBSN said:

I work outpatient and this is still a problem. We do not have “nurse to patient ratios” because the structure of working outpatient is completely different. But what is the same is being given an un-doable amount of work, and told that every item is supposed to be your top priority. Administrators will come and say “Why aren’t you (for example) screening every patient for depression, tobacco use, diabetic symptoms, street drug use, alcohol abuse, asthma control, up-to-date colonoscopy and mammography, and anxiety? You should be filling out all of these forms on every patient who walks in the door.”  They do not want to hear that tobacco screening is less important than depression screening, so the list of items to complete just grows and grows. 
 

When a nurse quits, she often isn’t replaced, leaving everyone else to desperately try to handle her workload. And, as mentioned in the article, Covid has done a number on us. Because all the nurses used to work “On the floor” (ie, taking care of patients who come to the clinic, answering phones for triage, taking pharmacy calls, etc), but now they pull half the staff to vaccinate or swab noses. It is overwhelming. 

Oh boy are you correct. I used to work hospital outpatient surgery and while the “ratios” were 2-1 pre op and pacu… it’s different because on top of that the hospital is supposed to be following ASPAN staffing standards and they never did. When you have 3 pacu nurses for 30 general anesthesia major surgery cases.. and you are expected to recover 10 patients in a 10 hour period or so, it’s burn out city. Same thing goes for the rush rush rush pre op environment where patients never went or were not called by the pre admission nurses. I left and went to another hospital with double the staff and about the same number of daily cases. It’s like night and day difference. I am very lucky and thankful 

Specializes in burn ICU, SICU, ER, Trauma Rapid Response.

This isn't rocket science, nor is this a new problem. There is a well established, tried and true cure for short staffing that's been successfully used many times by a variety of facilities. 

    Invest in and properly train new nurses. Give your nurses workable schedules, decent, safe working conditions, fair treatment by management, and PAY them MORE. 

   Over the last 26 years I've been in nursing I've seen this strategy used with great successes a number of times.   

1.Another factor is that nursing is female dominated. I can't tell you how many times we have had new nurses come in and work 2-3 years, start to have kids then go per diem. Per diem nurses are essentially useless as many work the bare minimum which varies by hospital. 

I am just stating my observation but this does play some sort of a role, not saying its good or bad.

2. The other factor is work force drain 2/2 higher education. I am an acute care NP and have had dozens and dozens of nurse techs, barely 21, ask me questions and tell me that as soon as they finish RN school they are headed for their NP. Terrible idea.

Specializes in Community health.
9 hours ago, Numenor said:

1.Another factor is that nursing is female dominated. I can't tell you how many times we have had new nurses come in and work 2-3 years, start to have kids then go per diem. Per diem nurses are essentially useless as many work the bare minimum which varies by hospital.

The hospital can solve this problem by either not having any per diem positions, or by making the “bare minimum” be 7 or 10 or 15 shifts a month. What are your other suggestions— Nobody is allowed to get pregnant?  Or only hire men and/or women over 50? Or you must work full-time, you are not allowed any less than 40 hours a week?  

Specializes in RN BN PG Dip.

 

19 hours ago, PMFB-RN said:

This isn't rocket science, nor is this a new problem. There is a well established, tried and true cure for short staffing that's been successfully used many times by a variety of facilities. 

    Invest in and properly train new nurses. Give your nurses workable schedules, decent, safe working conditions, fair treatment by management, and PAY them MORE. 

   Over the last 26 years I've been in nursing I've seen this strategy used with great successes a number of times.   

It's not rocket science. But if nurses continue to work under difficult circumstances the poor working conditions will go on.

The only way I see to improve working conditions here is through striking. 

 

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.
14 hours ago, Numenor said:

1.Another factor is that nursing is female dominated. I can't tell you how many times we have had new nurses come in and work 2-3 years, start to have kids then go per diem. Per diem nurses are essentially useless as many work the bare minimum which varies by hospital. 

I am just stating my observation but this does play some sort of a role, not saying its good or bad.

2. The other factor is work force drain 2/2 higher education. I am an acute care NP and have had dozens and dozens of nurse techs, barely 21, ask me questions and tell me that as soon as they finish RN school they are headed for their NP. Terrible idea.

I am curious: How long have you been a nurse and are you male or female? I guess you don't have to answer but I would like to know if you choose to.

On 6/5/2021 at 4:27 PM, CommunityRNBSN said:

But what is the same is being given an un-doable amount of work, and told that every item is supposed to be your top priority. Administrators will come and say “Why aren’t you (for example) screening every patient for depression, tobacco use, diabetic symptoms, street drug use, alcohol abuse, asthma control, up-to-date colonoscopy and mammography, and anxiety? You should be filling out all of these forms on every patient who walks in the door.”  They do not want to hear that tobacco screening is less important than depression screening, so the list of items to complete just grows and grows. 
 

When I worked as a teacher, someone would propose new material to add to the curriculum.  And our department chair would say, "Great choice! What are we getting rid of?"  That was the deal.  Our curriculum was stuffed full, and there was no way to add anything without doing a disservice to the material we already stretched to cover.  So anything added must have a corresponding deletion.

In nursing, all I see is administration adding.  When have you heard the powers that be say, "well, we want you to do this new thing, so now you're no longer responsible for that thing"?  Nope, it's always adding, but then expecting everything else to be still be done with the same staff and in the same timeframe.

Specializes in Med Surg.

Come on,are we really going to not notice that hospitals would not have this problem if they hired ADN's and LPN'S?

That is the real and only solution. 

Specializes in mental health / psychiatic nursing.

COVID policies led to decimated staffing at my hospital. Prior to COVID we had 100% of our positions filled. Yes - we still had sometimes with high call outs, but we even had our float-pool mostly filled so it was manageable. Over a year later we are in dire straights. Nurse staffing is down by  more than 50%.  Those who are left are burning out from the mix of emergency staffing, voluntary overtime, mandates etc. and injuries are WAY up which in turn contributes to even more staff out on leave or quitting.  I don't know how we are going to turn it around because at this point new staff brought on see a hot-fire and thus quit or established staff leave and we are barely filling positions fast enough to keep up with attrition. It's bad. Really, really bad. Management all the way up to DNS and above is working the floor. (even our CMO is working the floor at least shift per week right now.).  And we can't be shut down because we are 100% full on beds and have a wait list to take more patients. Hopefully we will get hiring ahead of attrition and get the place back together again. Apparently it's bad everywhere though - other local hospitals are also struggling and even my PCP said that the out patient clinic I go to is running at about 60% of usual staff due to # of call outs and people out on leave and not being able to find staff to back fill positions.  

Specializes in Wiping tears.

It will not get any better. Our older population is higher versus the healthcare providers. Don't know if I'm talking out of my anal cavity. Please correct me if I'm wrong. 

Read this article: Nursing and Pandemic 19. It's really interesting. Some nurses I know have been decreasing their work hours because they'd rather be with their families. They no longer feel the need to work extra hours. 

On 6/10/2021 at 2:04 AM, Iluvnightshift said:

Come on,are we really going to not notice that hospitals would not have this problem if they hired ADN's and LPN'S?

That is the real and only solution. 

Hospitals wouldn't have this problem if they hired. Period. We just hired a bunch of new CNA and Student Nurses (who work as CNAs, but can do a few extra things, too).  Can I tell you how much better it is already now that I'm (mostly) able to delegate patient care, vitals, etc.?  When the CNAs had like 16 patients each, it was almost like not having an aide (even though they were running their tails off).  

Lots of hospitals hire ADNs.  We've even got some diploma nurses at mine, and not just the veterans who were grandfathered.  I think there's like one diploma RN program left in my state, and I know at least one diploma RN who was hired about six months before I was with my shiny BSN.

As for LPNs, I personally see no reason that LPNs couldn't take an assignment in a hospital.  But I also don't think we're short staffed because we're not hiring them. There are enough RNs out there to staff hospitals, if they were supported enough to want to stay in bedside positions. If you hired LPNs, that would be a temporary infusion of labor, but then management would cut back, and I can't see LPNs wanting to hang out in the same short-staffed high-pressure environment that RNs are leaving.

The real problem is that hospitals intentionally go for lean staffing to save money.  If they proactively hired as soon as they got wind of a resignation, we'd be better off.  If they hired a few nurses more than they really needed, they'd be covered when someone left.  Instead, people leave, and HR or the Powers That Be wait around for a while while a little flame turns into a dumpster fire as more and more people leave.  As @verene says, once you hit a tipping point, it's really hard to get ahead of the attrition.  At that point, you can't hire fast enough, and newbies leave before they finish orientation, either because they're noping out of there or because they can't keep up with the insane demands and are let go.