Short Staffed: An Epidemic

I have only been a nurse for a couple years and in that time I have found one issue that unites all nurses: a deep loathing for an under-staffed unit. We’ve all experienced it, we all hate it. So how does it keep happening? To understand the how, we must start with the what. Furthermore, to find effective solutions, we must start with the driving causes.

Updated:  

Talk to any nurse and they will have something to say about the staffing at their hospital or facility. More often than not, that something will be an unflattering depiction best summed up with three words: stretched too thin. Additionally, the COVID 19 pandemic, like a flare up of a chronic disease, has only exacerbated the issue. While the problems addressed here can be frustrating, the goal is to rationally examine the causes of under-staffed hospital units in order to then identify potential solutions.

The Problem: Defining Short Staffing

What is short staffing? That depends primarily on the defined nurse-to-patient ratios in each hospital and on each unit. Ask any hospital administrator and any nurse at the same hospital to describe the safe, ideal nurse-to-patient ratio on a given unit and they will be give completely different answers. Why is this? One likely reason is the perspective and roles of each side varies greatly. An administrator considers a completely different set of criteria than a nurse would for the same problem.

The Fix

If nurse-to-patient ratios are the foundation for safe, effective patient care then coming to an agreement on what those ratios should be is paramount. This requires open, honest communication between clinicians and administrators alike. Clearly defined and agreed upon criteria for what adequate staffing on each unit looks like gives everyone a solid foundation with which to start. Nurses are critical to helping define these standards in order to ensure that expectations are realistic.

The Problem: Accounting for Census Changes

There is no question that patient censuses can fluctuate dramatically in short periods of time. We've all left a shift with adequate staffing only to come back 12 hours later to twice the patients and half the staff. These variabilities are difficult to predict, although not impossible to prepare for.

While floating nurses to other units is a commonly used solution, it is a temporary fix and not always seen favorably with floor nurses. Why is floating such a dreaded event? There are many perspectives and reasons although most of these boil down to one common element- the unknown.

On any given shift, there is a lot a nurse can know ahead of time and a lot they cannot. We can know our units- where the supply room or code cart is or the policy for various unit specific procedures and processes, on the other hand we can't know our patients, their conditions, or what may happen over the course of a shift until we are there. Floating to new units takes away the piece of the shift we can know.

The Fix

One option is to give nurses to chance to choose two separate units to work on and then provide full orientations to both units. Allowing nurses the choice of an extra unit gives them some element of control, additionally the orientation gives them the chance to be more comfortable and therefore safe on the unit. Furthermore, this would have the added benefit of reducing potential burn out from being in are place too long.

Another option is to hire nurses specifically as float/pool nurses. Setting the expectation at the time of hire for their role and work expectations will allow the hospital and nurse alike to find and fill roles that fit both parties.

The Problem: Nursing Burn Out and Turn Over

It's a true "chicken or the egg" type question: does short staffing cause nurse burn out or does nurse burn out cause short staffing? There are good arguments for either side, however ultimately addressing both issues is crucial.

The Fix

Hospital administrators have many parameters they use to measure their hospital's success. There are internal considerations such as patient satisfaction surveys and even employee surveys as well as external influences such as various accreditations that can elevate a hospital's standing. Including safe nurse-to-patient staffing ratios as a unit of measurement for success and then getting "dinged" every time a unit operates without appropriate staffing aligns nursing priorities with administration priorities.

This alignment of goals puts everyone on the same page. Which, in turn, helps nurses feel protected by their hospitals leading to a reduction in nurse turn over. All in all, it is mutually beneficial to ensure safe nurse-to-patient ratios.

The Best Chance for Change?

While short nurse staffing can be difficult problem to address, it is not impossible manage. Ultimately, the best chance for change has everyone working towards the same goals: safe, effective, compassionate care for our patients.

What are some of the issues you've found that contribute to under-staffing at your hospital?

What are some possible solutions?

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

The above post is true except hiring more staff is not the only answer. Making those who work there want to stay is even more important because we always need experience. Having a charge nurse 3 months out of orientation is.  not.  safe. Take care of your employees; they will take care of everything else if you do.

25 minutes ago, SmilingBluEyes said:

The above post is true except hiring more staff is not the only answer. Making those who work there want to stay is even more important because we always need experience. Having a charge nurse 3 months out of orientation is.  not.  safe. Take care of your employees; they will take care of everything else if you do.

True, but all the listening and morale-boosters in the world won't have the impact safe staffing does. Bonuses and shift incentives only work temporarily until people burn out.  More money is nice, but higher pay won't keep me in a job that makes me cry from stress and exhaustion. 

I think if you hire more staff, you have a better chance to retain the staff that's already there.  I've seen so many excellent, experienced nurses leave bedside positions in the past year.  For all of them, it was just the sense that they couldn't keep doing this anymore. I really think that if the staffing hadn't been stretched so thin for so long that they would have stayed.  

As much as I like donuts and socks and water bottles, all I really want for nurses week is safe staffing.  I feel like the floor managers and ANMs get this, but their hands are tied by upper management. I love being a nurse. I love my colleagues and my managers and my patients, but unless staffing improves, the day is going to come when I can't do it anymore either.

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.
1 minute ago, turtlesRcool said:

True, but I think if you hire more staff, you have a better chance to retain the staff that's already there.  I've seen so many excellent, experienced nurses leave bedside positions in the past year.  For all of them, it was just the sense that they couldn't keep doing this anymore. I really think that if the staffing hadn't been stretched so thin for so long that they would have stayed.  

As much as I like donuts and socks and water bottles, all I really want for nurses week is safe staffing.  I feel like the floor managers and ANMs get this, but their hands are tied by upper management. I love being a nurse. I love my colleagues and my managers and my patients, but unless staffing improves, the day is going to come when I can't do it anymore either.

Agreed! I want it for the whole year round. The stupid kitschy gifts they can keep.  For those of us who got nothing, I would settle for safe staffing and fair compensation for the risks I take being a nurse.

Specializes in mental health / psychiatic nursing.
1 hour ago, SmilingBluEyes said:

The above post is true except hiring more staff is not the only answer. Making those who work there want to stay is even more important because we always need experience. Having a charge nurse 3 months out of orientation is.  not.  safe. Take care of your employees; they will take care of everything else if you do.

Oh we are working on morale boosters too and seeing what we can do to get people to stay and to get people who've  been out on leave to come back to work. It's not a single prong approach by any means.  And fortunately while my unit has had it rough - we still have better morale compared to most and people will chose us over other units for voluntary overtime, and more of our regular staff show up to work.  I think having good leadership makes a big difference. You can tell the units/departments that care about their people and the ones that don't right now.  Hopefully the ones that are better off can impart some of their leadership and morale boosting strategies to those who are struggling more.

I'm confident that we'll turn it around eventually. The hospital has been around for well over 100 years and has been through any number of ups and downs in it's history so while it make take time I'm confident that we'll circle back to better days again. (This is no where close to rock bottom the historical perspective).  In my own perspective as much of a dumpster fire as it currently is - it's still one of, if not the best, job I've ever had - so I'm willing to stay to help turn the place around and make sure those new staff coming on are welcomed and given support in hopes they then become well trained and stick around.  My confidence in our hospital leadership has yet to be broken (The fact that our CMO and a lot of our other executive leaders will come work the floor -- even on weekend NOCs and other less desirable shifts -- and do whatever needs to be done to meet patient needs with out ego speaks highly to their willingness to lead by example and to put the safety and needs of their staff and patients first). 

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.
Just now, verene said:

Oh we are working on morale boosters too and seeing what we can do to get people to stay and to get people who've  been out on leave to come back to work. It's not a single prong approach by any means.  And fortunately while my unit has had it rough - we still have better morale compared to most and people will chose us over other units for voluntary overtime, and more of our regular staff show up to work.  I think having good leadership makes a big difference. You can tell the units/departments that care about their people and the ones that don't right now.  Hopefully the ones that are better off can impart some of their leadership and morale boosting strategies to those who are struggling more.

I'm confident that we'll turn it around eventually. The hospital has been around for well over 100 years and has been through any number of ups and downs in it's history so while it make take time I'm confident that we'll circle back to better days again. (This is no where close to rock bottom the historical perspective).  In my own perspective as much of a dumpster fire as it currently is - it's still one of, if not the best, job I've ever had - so I'm willing to stay to help turn the place around and make sure those new staff coming on are welcomed and given support in hopes they then become well trained and stick around.  My confidence in our hospital leadership has yet to be broken (The fact that our CMO and a lot of our other executive leaders will come work the floor -- even on weekend NOCs and other less desirable shifts -- and do whatever needs to be done to meet patient needs with out ego speaks highly to their willingness to lead by example and to put the safety and needs of their staff and patients first). 

I appreciate this positive post. Thank you.

Specializes in CMA, CNA.

So is anybody noticing hiring LPNs in hospitals? I'll be one in a year and then bridge to RN, but I would LOVE to try hospital. LTC currently, for 5 years. All the nurses say money is better here but benefits better in hospital. I'd totally do 3 12-hour shifts in a hospital-- sign me up!

6 hours ago, AmandaBeaverhausen said:

So is anybody noticing hiring LPNs in hospitals? I'll be one in a year and then bridge to RN, but I would LOVE to try hospital. LTC currently, for 5 years. All the nurses say money is better here but benefits better in hospital. I'd totally do 3 12-hour shifts in a hospital-- sign me up!

No.  

Honestly, as I said above, there are enough RNs out there.  There just aren't enough RNs willing to work for the current pay and conditions at certain hospitals. And even that's not true. There aren't enough experienced RNs willing to STAY at those hospitals.  

Hiring LPNs might sound like a great opportunity, until you think about why we're even having this conversation.  RNs are leaving because the conditions are bad, which makes the conditions worse, which makes more RNs leave. The conditions that make RNs leave hospitals aren't magically better when the employees are LPNs.  An organization that doesn't proactively fill positions, and uses lean "just-in-time" staffing models to save money with RNs is not an organization that is going to facilitate robust staffing with LPNs.  

You can say now that you'd totally do 3 12s a week...until you actually experience the reality of those shifts turning to 13s and 14s with barely a pee break and too many patients in unsafe conditions. Until you see patients with poor outcomes because you were stretched too thin. Until you are filled with dread before a shift and exhaustion after. Trust me - you wouldn't "LOVE to try" that. You're not even a nurse yet; you have not gone to work knowing people could literally die because you don't have time to give them the care they deserve. It's not just overwork; it's moral injury (look that up if you're not familiar with the term), and it gnaws people out from the inside. The reality of what we're experiencing in hospitals now does not match the exciting opportunity in your head.

Specializes in Wiping tears.

I work in SNF. It's guaranteed that at night that we have 30, or 40 people per CNA. Some CNAs think that 12 or 20 is hard. It becomes a good laugh in my circle for being CNAs when they say, "I don't like____; they have 18 or 20 residents per CNA at night." For me, even though it's not funny, it makes me laugh. ?. I took care of the ventilators before. 2 CNAs for 38 vents and trach with a few trying to pull their trachs.  We made it. Our nurses and RTs were fabulous, so I wasn't nervous that much. My partner was outstanding, too. She is halfway in her pharm to be a pharmacist. 

I feel bad for the nurses when they're short-staffed. It gets chaotic. They should have at least one person passing medications to stable patients. 

Specializes in Wiping tears.
14 hours ago, SmilingBluEyes said:

The above post is true except hiring more staff is not the only answer. Making those who work there want to stay is even more important because we always need experience. Having a charge nurse 3 months out of orientation is.  not.  safe. Take care of your employees; they will take care of everything else if you do.

It also makes our duties as CNAs, a lot easier. Got a newly graduate nurse who administered MOM at night. It's safe for the people who are bed-bound but those who can walk. We already had a few serious injuries as a result of this rushing to get up to use a toilet. 

I don't know really how the MOM is used during the night time, but it has been causing some issues among patients who are capable of walking.

Specializes in Psyche Nursing, Med/Surg, LTAC.

  There needs to be a hard limit on the amount of patients one nurse is responsible for. I really enjoyed being a nurse for years-until the amount of patients kept getting slowly increased, more and more duties were gradually added, and LPNs and CNAs were quietly phased out. It became a nerve-wracking, undoable job where I was driving home every night scared to death that I missed something critical.  I don't care how good your time-management skills are-there is a limit to how many people you can pay careful attention to while performing multiple tasks and still be aware of changes. I would take a job with less pay if they would guarantee a limit on number of patients and some auxiliary help. 

  A CEO at the hospital once asked in exasperation ,"Nursing is never satisfied. What do they want?" My answer would be-"To do a good job."

If you create the conditions where a nurse can NOT do a good job, no matter how hard they try-they leave. 

 

Specializes in Non judgmental advisor.

I think there won’t be an incentive to change if nurses do continue to come into work . When they do not the following steps happen 

management will be asked to work as cnas or nurses . 
 

and if not enough policies will be revised to increase the ratio. Maybe 12 to one 

 

if that’s doesn’t work out they’ll float till they have to shut down 

On 6/11/2021 at 10:57 AM, ThursdayNight said:

Read this article: Nursing and Pandemic 19. It's really interesting.

?  Some journalist actually tried to find out some things! (Although they hold the refrigerator decorations in too high regard and don't seem to understand that's just another dog and pony show). Pretty well done, though!

 

On 6/12/2021 at 3:39 PM, NurseScribe said:

If you create the conditions where a nurse can NOT do a good job, no matter how hard they try-they leave. 

Confirmed.