Published
California Nurses Association may be targeting University of Chicago after Cook County win
If there's a campaign map on the wall at the Oakland, Calif., headquarters of the California Nurses Association, the Chicago area must be ground zero.
Since winning away Cook County's 1,800 nurses from the Illinois Nurses Association, the independent union has linked with nurses at more than 20 Chicago-area hospitals with the goal of organizing a handful of them, union officials say.
One possible target is the University of Chicago Hospitals, where workers from the national organizing arm of the California Nurses have been talking with nurses.
They say they are only helping the 1,300 University of Chicago nurses, who belong to the Illinois Nurses Association. But they do not rule out an eventual organizing drive like the one they successfully staged at Cook County.
The situation is "reminiscent" of what happened with Cook County's nurses, confirmed Fernando Losada, head of Midwest operations for the National Nurses Organizing Committee, the national arm for the California Nurses Association.
Full Story: Raids on members causing high fever in nurse unions [Chicago Tribune,United States]
topic: raids on members causing high fever in nurse unionsplease keep discussion focused on effect raiding has on nursing unions.
use other established thread to discuss pros/cons union. ty.
the link in the op is no longer functional. makes it hard to discuss the issue.
can you give us the date of the article so we can read it.
thanks.
If a union is doing it's job and taking care of it's members, it does not need to worry about union raids. It is the members that decide (through voting) who will represent them. There was much turmoil at my hospital about 5 years ago. It was created when another union "raided" the established union. The established union represented all the hospital workers. The new union came in on an RN only platform. Nurses voted to ratify the new RN only union. The established union had NOT been taking care of RN's due to competing needs from other workers. It was an RN that started the process and was not so much of a raid as it was a statement that RN's wanted our own voice...not one diluted by the majority non-licensed staff.
"Raiding", "decertifying", are terms that define dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs in terms of representation in a unionized environment.
Participation in the everyday activities of the union as an organization ensures that the voice of the members is heard. Not enough of us do that.
Elected leaders can be voted out without having to change the entire structure and start from the beginning. Chief negotiators and staff of any new organization at a workplace have to develop relationships and navigate the political minefield of the city/county/healthsystem.
It takes a while and a lot of work before the dust settles after a decertification. All that energy and effort could have been spent in restructuring the existing organization, but I guess some people feel more attracted to something new.
In the news article that started this thread, the RNs had an RN only voice, there was no dilution with non-licensed staff, and all they did is take a chance with a new organization with no experience outside California. Go figure!!
The link in the OP is no longer functional. Makes it hard to discuss the issue.Can you give us the date of the article so we can read it.
Thanks.
The Burke Group liked the article so much they re-printed it.
Very rude, dumb and fake people. I call it the dead face society. Most everyoine will not make eye contect, or even say hello, or excuse me.Oh yes the ocean, and all of that is nice, but when that real estate market crumbles- ouch. Not to mention it's a lot like living in another country.
I'm sooooooo glad I left and moved to the midwest.
Looks like you have so much hatred in your heart. I've seen some of your posts with topics that had been closed in other threads.
Can I just ask something? Do you think-- the people you work with enjoy working with you?--- how's your relationship with people?--- and one more thing, do you speak for America or only for your own opinions and prejudiced remarks? What if everyone says---I don't want you here???
"Intelligence is different from gaining wisdom."
In the news article that started this thread, the RNs had an RN only voice, there was no dilution with non-licensed staff, and all they did is take a chance with a new organization with no experience outside California. Go figure!!
I just think it's crazy for RNs to undermine each other and the patient care team and then say it's because that's what's best for RNs. We should support each other in whatever endeavor we take on.
Here is the story of the registered nurse who first contacted CNA/NNOC
http://www.calnurses.org/publications/revolution/2005/nov-dec/revmag_novdec05_torch.pdf
Cook County nurses split with INA - http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=News&id=3069587
fergus51
6,620 Posts
Again, you clearly don't know me. I don't rely on my employer for my retirement plan. I actually opt out of benefits. You shouldn't assume so much.
Secondly, I don't want to be my own employer. I like going to work and going home and being done with it. I make a good living doing it. I am not underpaid by any means. I'm one of the few nurses on this board that doesn't complain about her pay.
Thirdly, the union does owe me something. The world doesn't, but the union does. That's my dues money they get every month and I expect many things for that money. I get them too.
Finally, having worked in one bad union place doesn't make you the authority on all things union related. Just like the fact that I've worked in two crappy non-union places doesn't make me an authority on all things non-union. The world isn't black and white. There are going to be some nice union workplaces and some nice non-union workplaces, and bad places of each type. If you want to work only non-union, I don't care. If I want to work in union hospitals I don't think it affects you at all either. I make my decisions in life based on my knowledge and experiences just like you do. What's right for you isn't necessarily what's right for me.