Michigan hospital sued after honoring woman's request for "white nurse only"

Published

3rd Michigan hospital faces suit alleging it honored patient request for care only by white nurses

In the lawsuit, Teoka Williams, RN, alleges that on Oct. 2 she heard a patient say she did not want any black caregivers. Ms. Williams says she told the clinical manager, who then spoke to the patient. The clinical manager then reportedly told Ms. Williams not to enter the patient's room or care for her. A white nurse was asked to care for the patient.

Ms. Williams also alleges that she told the human resources department about the incident and was told "patient requests are honored all the time and that the next time it happened, she would be taken off the assignment altogether," News 5 Cleveland reports.

Ok...

So what if that same Muslim family said I dont want a Jew taking care of my family. Is that ok then because Jewish is a religion...

They can say whatever they want to say. If it's not a part of the Torah. I will not oblige.

Stop trying to excuse racism. Ugh, just can't help it can y'all.

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.
I Know that you're speaking from a place of privilege.

Please don't quote me any longer! Will be considered harassment.

Let's focus on the subject. No personal attacks.

Have a blessed day!

I'm glad the nurse sued! I hope she wins big time!

How do you know Wuzzie is speaking from a place of privilege, what does that mean?

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.
They can say whatever they want to say. If it's not a part of the Torah. I will not oblige.

Stop trying to excuse racism. Ugh, just can't help it can y'all.

I dont think anyone is excusing rasism. Just trying to figure out this case and how it will apply practically in the hospital setting.

I Know that you're speaking from a place of privilege.

Please don't quote me any longer! Will be considered harassment.

Let's focus on the subject. No personal attacks.

Have a blessed day!

I'm glad the nurse sued! I hope she wins big time!

Explain to me how my post was a personal attack? You were the one who threw the opening salvo by making assumptions about my "lack of empathy".

I am allowed to quote whomever I like and I will. Feel free to block me.

How do you know Wuzzie is speaking from a place of privilege, what does that mean?

In relation to the context of my original post it isn't even relevant. There is nothing inherently racist, prejudiced, bigoted, unempathetic or otherwise in wondering why someone does something. My subsequent post spoke of supporting the nurse in an ugly situation. Privilege has nothing to do with it. This person appears to have an axe to grind and is throwing PC buzzwords around in an attempt to smear my character while claiming "harassment" simply because I disagreed with her.

They can say whatever they want to say. If it's not a part of the Torah. I will not oblige.

Stop trying to excuse racism. Ugh, just can't help it can y'all.

It seems like you might possibly have the Torah and the Koran reversed.

The "they" you refer to in the hypothetical example are Muslim, and their holy book is not the Torah.

I Know that you're speaking from a place of privilege.

Please don't quote me any longer! Will be considered harassment.

Let's focus on the subject. No personal attacks.

Have a blessed day!

I'm glad the nurse sued! I hope she wins big time!

First off, I agree with you that there is difference between following your understanding of your religious law and simply being a bigot, as you are debating with Kyrshamarks (and others), I suspects he also knows the difference, but who knows on an anonymous forum?

I do, however, take issue with your claim that quoting you is harassment. Resorting to that shows a lack of confidence in your argument. As does disregarding Wuzzie's post because you believe it comes from a position of privilege.

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.
In relation to the context of my original post it isn't even relevant. There is nothing inherently racist, prejudiced, bigoted, unempathetic or otherwise in wondering why someone does something. My subsequent post spoke of supporting the nurse in an ugly situation. Privilege has nothing to do with it. This person appears to have an axe to grind and is throwing PC buzzwords around in an attempt to smear my character while claiming "harassment" simply because I disagreed with her.

I couldn't agree more! I meant no disrespect to you, I am sorry if you took it that way.

Specializes in OB.

Funny story: several years ago we had a patient request that only a male phlebotomist could take her blood. We are in L&D so all nurses on our unit were female. We called the lab with this ridiculous request and they sent the male phlebotomist. The patient was a difficult stick and after several attempts the phlebotomist gave up. We called the ER, and they sent their IV specialist who happened to be the MOST flamboyant male RN! Sweetest dude you're ever gonna meet. Pt was not happy, but hey, you wanted a male!!

Specializes in ACNP-BC, Adult Critical Care, Cardiology.

Allowing white patient to request white-only caregiver:

- reinforces a racist belief that people of color are inferior and less competent

- disrespects people of color as unworthy of their role as the patient's caregiver

- reignites history of painful discrimination, segregation, marginalization, and maltreatment of people of color especially Black Americans

Alllowing Muslin female to request female-only caregiver:

- respects a Muslim woman's practice of modesty which is one of the teachings of her religion

- does not imply that male caregivers are incompetent or unworthy of their professional role

- does not disrespect the male role in our society, which, historically have not often been the subject of discrimination or persecution

Those to me are the differences in the two scenarios. I support the nurse who sued.

Specializes in Geriatrics, Dialysis.

I guess I don't understand how a lawsuit could really end up with a finding for the nurses. As far as I know employers pretty much universally retain the right to assign staff as needed, if the employer decided honoring a patients wish regarding which nurses are assigned is ok even if it is based on the patient's prejudice I still don't see that as legally actionable, at least not unless preferentially assigning nursing staff is habitual and some harm to the staff can be proved.

I guess I don't understand how a lawsuit could really end up with a finding for the nurses. As far as I know employers pretty much universally retain the right to assign staff as needed, if the employer decided honoring a patients wish regarding which nurses are assigned is ok even if it is based on the patient's prejudice I still don't see that as legally actionable, at least not unless preferentially assigning nursing staff is habitual and some harm to the staff can be proved.

Take this out of the context of nursing, and look at it from that angle.

I am going to golf today and insist on a white caddy.

Make sure you send a white repairman to my house, I dont have the time and energy to follow a ______ around my house to see nothing is stolen.

In fact, I'll be out at the only restaurant that honors my request that only white people touch my food. Though I don't mind if that other kind cleans up, that seems about right to me.

My kid's teacher was filling his head with nonsense, calling this attitude racism, till I switched teachers. I told that principle that no immigrant is going to be teaching my kid- that "teacher" should be out picking lettuce like the rest of them.

Oh, and by the way, I'll be needing a white nurse.

+ Join the Discussion