Magnet designation- what’s the big deal? This article, written from a staff nurse perspective in a hospital which just recently achieved “Magnet”, takes a look at what hospitals must do to achieve Magnet designation, and discusses the major benefits of this voluntary hospital designation while recognizing some of the common concerns and criticisms
Simply put, Magnet designation symbolizes "nurse-driven excellence in patient safety, quality outcomes and patient satisfaction" 1. So what exactly does this mean? To better understand the meaning of nursing excellence and the value of Magnet designation, it helps to also take a look at some of the groundbreaking research by Linda Aiken 2-7. Aiken, an internationally recognized nurse scientist, has been involved in numerous studies linking nursing excellence to patient outcomes. The results of her research have led to a greater awareness of how variables such as nurse work environment, nurse education and nurse empowerment to innovate affect a multitude of outcomes including patient satisfaction scores, mortality rates and failure-to-rescue rates. Improvements in these variables also affect hospital reimbursement 8. It is no surprise that, given this magnitude of evidence which demonstrates the value of nursing excellence, more and more hospitals are striving to become Magnet designated. Below are what organizations must do to achieve magnet.
(#1-#3 are based upon information obtained the American Nurses Credentialing Center's (ANCC) website's "Journey to Magnet Excellence"1):
Programs such as shared governance, nursing research and evidence-based practice councils, and peer review are just some examples.
Achieving and maintaining Magnet designation is a lot of work for the hospitals and for the nurses who work there. But in my experience, the personal, professional and work-based benefits are worth the effort. Most importantly, our patients are worth the effort. In my hospital, achieving magnet designation has already helped bring about a very positive culture change.
References
1. American Nurses Credentialing Center (2015). Journey to Magnet. https://www.nursingworld.org/magnet
2. Aiken, L. H., Shang, J., Xue, Y., & Sloane, D. M. (2013). Hospital use of agency-employed supplemental nurses and patient mortality and failure to rescue. Health Services Research, 48(3), 931-948. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12018
3. Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Bruyneel, L., Van den Heede, K., Griffiths, P., Busse, R., . . . RN4CAST Consortium. (2014). Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine european countries: A retrospective observational study. Lancet, 383(9931), 1824-1830. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62631-8
4. Kutney-Lee, A., Sloane, D. M., & Aiken, L. H. (2013). An increase in the number of nurses with baccalaureate degrees is linked to lower rates of postsurgery mortality. Health Affairs, 32(3), 579-586. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0504
5. Kutney-Lee, A., Stimpfel, A. W., Sloane, D. M., Cimiotti, J. P., Quinn, L. W., & Aiken, L. H. (2015). Changes in patient and nurse outcomes associated with magnet hospital recognition. Medical Care, 53(6), 550-557.
6. Lasater, K. B., Sloane, D. M., & Aiken, L. H. (2015). Hospital employment of supplemental registered nurses and patients' satisfaction with care. Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(3), 145-151. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000174
7. Stimpfel, A. W., & Aiken, L. H. (2013). Hospital staff nurses' shift length associated with safety and quality of care. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 28(2), 122-129. doi:10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3182725f09
8. New York University (2015). Nursing Research: Magnet hospitals have better overall patient experiences which may positively enhance reimbursement for hospitals. NYU News. 10/07/2015. Nursing Research: Magnet Hospitals Have Better Overall Patient Experiences Which May Positively Enhance Reimbursement for Hospitals
Thanks for all of the passionate and at times, entertaining, feedback. I can only speak to my own experience and the experience of many nurses I have worked with in my hospital and my state (we don't have unions btw). I agree completely that Magnet does not improve outcomes- nurses do. Magnet also does not improve nurse retention- but many nurses are choosing to stay at these hospitals. In fact, Magnet doesn't "do" anything - but it supports a lot, and I for one appreciate what it supports b/c at my hospital, that has influenced a positive and needed change.
And I am MOST grateful for the nurses I work with, who do not "need" Magnet or any other entity to tell them to be engaged and to be leaders in their profession.
Thanks for all of the passionate and at times, entertaining, feedback. I can only speak to my own experience and the experience of many nurses I have worked with in my hospital and my state (we don't have unions btw). I agree completely that Magnet does not improve outcomes- nurses do. Magnet also does not improve nurse retention- but many nurses are choosing to stay at these hospitals. In fact, Magnet doesn't "do" anything - but it supports a lot, and I for one appreciate what it supports b/c at my hospital, that has influenced a positive and needed change.And I am MOST grateful for the nurses I work with, who do not "need" Magnet or any other entity to tell them to be engaged and to be leaders in their profession.
Magnet does nothing, and the administration of the facility (who are in the business of healthcare) need to support anything that a committee comes up with. And if it negatively affects the bottom line, then by all means, THAT is not going to be even remotely supported. But what they are getting is a think tank of nurses who for free are increasing their profits.
And giving you all the illusion that their koolaid is the best flavor.
Nurses don't need entities to have them be a leader. But that is in direct contraindication of what any entity is attempting to do.
We all have patients who need to function at the highest level they can. In order to do that, nurses invest time and energy to make that so. In order for it to work, there needs to be staff that is appropriate, innovative levels of resources, and everyone all in--to motivate the patients to be their best selves. From nursing, to CNA's, to PT/OT, to social work, to the lab, x-ray--all parts that make a whole. It takes a village. And if leaders spent time coordinating care maps that cross all levels of care, take invested people and encourage and support furthering specific certifications directly related to the care of patients--count me in.
Otherwise, I am all set with the thousands (and apparently in some cases millions) of dollars spent on rigamarole that is useless to direct patient care.
And last I knew, insurance companies don't approve based on magnet status. Nor do ambulance companies bypass appropriate hospitals to get to magnet--and in fact that goes directly against policy--in any event patients all get the exact same survey at the end of it all. And facilities will still support the highest level of degrees, the most "volunteer" hours they can, for the least amount of salary feasible and/or bare minimum staffing.
1.It has zero to do with outcomes.2. It has zero to do nurse patient ratios.
3. ANCC sells magnet certification as well the nurse certifications that they require. That is an obvious
conflict of interest.
4. Outside of true academic world class medical centers it just over complicates what is obvious to anyone with half a brain.
5. It's just a means for a self promoting nurse administrator to put a feather in her cap and put that on a cv.
6. Nurses resent the second job of unit albums, cheesy posters and mandatory committee work.
7. At a cost of 250k per 50 beds plus all of the consultants and man hours, it is a kick in the teeth to nurses who are working in dangerously understaffed hospitals.
Agreed. The OP is just an exercise in overthinking a whole lot of boo-hooray. I worked for a magnet hospital; it was the most corporate style, impersonal environment that I've worked in during my entire life.
I work in a Magnet hospital and think it does support great outcomes. Nurses are involved in many research projects, we have many nurse authors. Our council's affect outcomes. Having been at the hospital before it was magnet, it has changed our hospital for the better. I am someone who likes to be involved in care and outcome. I want to be a part of change. Being at the bedside is great, but there are so many other aspects of nursing, and we all have the same goal in mind, improving the care for our patients.
I am sorry or all of those who feel negatively about magnet, I think it has made a difference. We have many projects, programs that are all nurse lead. I don't personally think that these projects would have the same support if we were not magnet.
I do not work for ANCC just as a qualifying statement
Interesting tidbit. The last hospital I worked for was in the process of trying to re-attain Magnet status during my tenure there. During the three-day Magnet site visit, our unit manager had an extra body on the floor to work as a navigator (to help with patients) and made sure the charge RN had no assignment. When Magnet left, so did the navigator, and our charge was back to having a full assignment. I'm sure I don't have to tell you what that did for morale. Yet we were all supposed to have our Magnet buttons on and little Magnet stickers on our WOWs. Farcical.
suitcase calling
24 Posts
Magnet status is the reason I cannot work in an institution hoping to achieve Magnet status or maintain it. I chose a Health Management BS instead of BSN & have worked as a nurse for 30+ years, need to sign on the dotted that I'll get BSN in 5 years. I don't think so. There seems to be no regard for where the BSN is achieved-diploma mill or quality nursing education. Close relative works in Magnet hospital & resented the extra committee work and the hospital was put on probationary status.