Published Nov 18, 2008
My boyfriend and I were having a discussion and we were wondering what the largest ED is in the US.
Thanks!
Teresa:nurse:
mwboswell
561 Posts
I think I posted this a while back but one thing you have to always be careful of when they cite bed #'s is which are "ROOMS" versus stretchers in the hallway. There's a difference between operating capacity and surge capacity.
I'll give your our numbers for our ETC...
Children's ER: 13 rooms, 1 Peds Trauma bay
Critical Care: 15 rooms, 8 hall stretchers, 2 trauma bays
Intermediate ER: 20 rooms, 10 hall stretchers
Chest pain ER: 14 rooms, 4 hall stretchers
Fast Track: 6 rooms
Observation ER: 8 rooms
SANE: 1 room
Behavioral ER: 21 rooms
"Overflow" Hall: 6 stretchers
Total rooms: 101 rooms
Hall Stretchers: 28 stretchers
We typically operate at 100% of the room capacity 75-80% of the time.
We are "in the halls" (IE: on stretchers) approx 60% of that time.
Anual volume 150,000+
Total rooms: 101 roomsHall Stretchers: 28 stretchersWe typically operate at 100% of the room capacity 75-80% of the time.We are "in the halls" (IE: on stretchers) approx 60% of that time.Anual volume 150,000+
Someone asked abuot staffing...
CC: 4 RNS, 1 charge, 1 trauma float
IMC: 4 RN's, 1 RN charge
CEC: 3 RN's, 1 RN Charge
CPC: 2-3 RN's
FT: 1 RN
OBS: 1-2 RN's
BEhavioral 2 RN's
1 shift charge RN
3-5 Nurse Techs at any given time
4-5 Secretaries/Unit coordinators at any given time
There is a little flexibility in these numbers depening on volumes/trends and needs.
rjflyn, ASN, RN
1,240 Posts
Its not so much the number of beds, because if you build them they will come. I worked in a ER in NC, at the time we had about 40-45. The actually number was debatable because of hall spots and chairs. At the time a new ED was in the early planning stages. Now they have a 90+ bed ER that is slam pack full all the time. Thats with the other hospital in town less than 2 miles away.
And actually legally a hospital has to cite licensed beds.
RJ
angel337, MSN, RN
899 Posts
we have 64 beds total. i would rather work in a ED with alot of rooms instead of a community hospital with say 20 beds and not enough staff. i worked in hospital like that before and it was horrible because they saw about 170 pt's a day with only 7 nurses and 2 attendings. when a ED has enough rooms they will staff appropriately for the most part.
care4you
51 Posts
the ER in Dayton ohio has about 100 beds and sees close to 150,000 pts a year. VERY BUSY:bugeyes:
Hagabel
148 Posts
I work in WA state and we saw just over 105, 000 pts last year with 49 beds and 13 hallway beds. Crazy busy!!
traumababy
1 Post
We only have 20 beds, but we have 4 "hall beds" and 2 "waiting for a bed" areas. We are usually packed to the hilt, and it only continues to get worse...
j450n, BSN, MSN, RN
242 Posts
Harborview?
Actually nope! Sent you a PM.
neneRN, BSN, RN
642 Posts
I'm in FL...have 85 beds and saw 142,000 pts last year.
woody436
104 Posts
Ohhh....I LOVE the idea of the "pod" set up...it's like having a handful of mini-ed's in one large ED...very nice idea indeed!
Does each resource nurse report to the charge nurse on a given shift? Are those positions perm. or ad-hoc? Do you have a fast-track? How big is triage?
hypocaffeinemia, BSN, RN
1,381 Posts
I wonder what the record is for highest bed-to-patient load ratio is.
We're only a 12-bed main ER, 10-bed fast track yet we see 60,000+ annually. Granted, we don't handle trauma so our acuity is lower, but still...
(We're moving to a 40+ bed ER next year).