This article explores the pros and cons of registered nurses pursuing their BSN. The information included is based on the writer's personal observations and experiences, both before and after obtaining a BSN degree.
75 members have participated
If you're the kind of nurse who loves working three 12s and having the rest of your week off, you might find that options are limited away from the bedside. Many non-clinical positions are Monday-Friday, daytime operations that only offer 8 hour shifts. Some may offer 4-10s or rotating shifts, but 3-day work weeks are hard to come by outside of direct patient care.
If you really love taking care of patients, and really loathe sitting in meetings and doing paperwork, that's something to consider when thinking about your BSN. Leadership and education positions tend to involve a lot of writing and speaking; if figuring out schedules, sending emails, and giving presentations is not your thing, most administrative BSN roles won't be a good fit.
On the other hand, if the clinical aspect of nursing is your passion and you intend to eventually pursue an advanced practice role as a nurse practitioner or nurse anesthetist, you will absolutely need your BSN first. CRNA programs also require at least a year of recent critical care experience, so you won't want to stray far from the bedside once you have your BSN.
If you're thinking of getting a BSN just to earn more and become more marketable, it helps to have the facts. In many hospitals, there is no wage increase for earning your BSN. Most facilities determine pay based on the job description, more so than the credentials. For instance, the administration looks at market values and determines that RNs at the bedside should make X dollars an hour. Some may add a bit to the hourly wage for a BSN, but many do not; a bedside nurse is a bedside nurse and they are paid as such even with a BSN.
This is certainly something many would like to change, but before that can happen there will need to be a fundamental change in BSN education. Currently, a nurse can earn a BSN in a matter of months online without a single live lecture or any hands-on learning. Few, if any, BSN programs require a clinical component or practicum. There are no advanced clinical skills, no new knowledge significant enough to affect performance at the bedside, and therefore no real justification for an increase in pay. An overhaul to existing BSN programs, including advanced clinicals, might help to change that and make BSNs more marketable.
If you do intend to transition into a higher-paying leadership role with your BSN, go for it; just bear in mind that most management and education roles are salaried, not hourly, so figure that into your calculations. If you're someone who relies on occasional overtime or likes to pick up holidays for the premium pay, these differentials usually don't apply to salaried (aka "exempt") positions.
If you're trying to get ahead, continuing education and impressive credentials will certainly help. Bear in mind, though, that the BSN is becoming very commonplace now among bedside nurses. Many hospitals strongly encourage, and even require, nurses to obtain a BSN within a certain number of years after hire or in order to apply for transfers within the organization. In the recent past, BSN nurses were in leadership roles as nurse managers, directors of nursing in long-term care, and nursing instructors in diploma and ADN schools. Now that the average bedside nurse has, or is expected to earn their BSN, leadership and advanced roles are requiring even higher levels of education. You should absolutely pursue the degree if you want to advance, but many nurses now are also seeking additional certifications in various specialties like diabetes, oncology, or wound care, in order to stay competitive.
One more thing any nurse should consider before returning to school is the matter of finances. Some may qualify for federal grants or full scholarships, but most working nurses will end up paying at least part of their tuition and fees out of pocket. If you're lucky enough to get a free ride, take full advantage of it. If you're like most nurses and have to rely on student loans and/or tuition reimbursement, take all the factors into account before you decide. For instance:
What is your current financial situation? Even with student loans and tuition reimbursement, many nurses often have out of pocket expenses for every semester. If your nursing job lands you a certain income bracket, you may only receive partial student loans and have to pay the remainder of tuition yourself. That's something to consider if money is already tight. Also remember that currently, getting your BSN does not guarantee an increase in monthly income. All too often BSNs find themselves in the same job making the same money, but now with a student loan payment to contend with every month.
How close are you to retirement? The repayment period for most student loans is 10 years, so it may not be worth it if you plan to retire in 6. However, if your finances are such that you could pay extra or pay the loan off early, you might want to go ahead.
Are you planning to relocate or change employers after graduation? Employer tuition reimbursement usually exchanges financial aid for months or years of continued service post-graduation. If you leave your employment before the debt is worked off, the benefit has to be paid back to the facility. Read the tuition assistance policies carefully to determine how long you'll need to stay on after graduation and what your payback amount would be should you choose to leave early.
Is your projected BSN salary enough to balance out the student loan debt? Most BSNs end up paying around $240 per month for their student loan after graduation, so bear in mind that you'll need to make at least that much more per month just to break even. The sad truth is that as it stands now, many BSNs find themselves struggling to make that monthly payment when there is no wage increase for earning the extra degree. Leadership roles will usually pay you a bit more, but remember to think about the schedule requirements and exempt/non-exempt status of those positions.
Generally speaking, you almost can't go wrong with more education. The more letters behind your name, the better your resume looks, and there is also a sense of personal achievement. Still, when considering a BSN program, it's important to examine all the pieces: your goals, your finances, your lifestyle and family situations, as well as your likes and dislikes when it comes to work. Do you need to be home with your kids more? Do you rely on overtime or shift differential to make ends meet? Do you love patients but hate paperwork? These are all things to consider.
We all eagerly look forward to the day when the BSN translates to tangible benefits for the average nurse. Sadly, as it stands right now, for many there is no life-changing advantage and the BSN serves only as a stepping stone to an even higher degree or advanced clinical practice. The information here is not meant to discourage anyone from pursuing higher education, only to help put the undergraduate degree and its pros and cons into perspective.
If your facility requires the BSN for bedside nurses, then your choice is simple. However, if you just really love taking care of patients and have no desire to enter leadership or administration, you may fare better with a specialty certification in an area that interests you. The cost is far less, and the BSN does not focus on clinical skills. If you do want to qualify for entry-level leadership and education roles, then the BSN is the way to go. In future we hope to see the BSN carry more weight and offer more leverage, but to do so it must also provide increased skills and greater knowledge. Changes in education are likely the only thing that will translate into changes in benefits. Still, the great thing about nursing is that we have a wide-open, versatile field where there is something for everybody. Hopefully the information included here can help you decide which of those somethings is right for you in your own nursing practice.
I agree with this article: it's not the same answer for everyone. I'm an ADN that started in a level 1 trauma center ER. I was told when I was hired that they do encourage ADNs to pursue our BSNs, but that the hospital only encourages this because they want Magnet status. Hospital administration doesn't actually believe BSNs make better bedside nurses here.
Also, the problem with getting a BSN is that there just is NO financial incentive. Why should I pay $20,000 for a degree when they're only offering a 2% raise for a BSN? My ER manager told me upon hire that our ED is getting a 3% raise next year and a 6% raise 2 years after that. She actually said off the record that she would not get a BSN if she was me. I'm already employed and I'd rather just put more money into my retirement savings.
supakimchee said:Also, the problem with getting a BSN is that there just is NO financial incentive. I'm already employed and I'd rather just put more money into my retirement savings.
I think that is a fairly common thought process. Unfortunately, that same process also ens up with some of the experiences other posters have mentioned: eventually you will be a bit older and looking for a job and hitting a stone wall, even with your experience.
Living in the present is important, but planning for the future is as well. Many hospitals offer reimbursement for tuition which it makes financial sense to use if possible. Many nursing programs offer course credit for precepting students as well.
BostonFNP said:I think that is a fairly common thought process. Unfortunately, that same process also ens up with some of the experiences other posters have mentioned: eventually you will be a bit older and looking for a job and hitting a stone wall, even with your experience.Living in the present is important, but planning for the future is as well. Many hospitals offer reimbursement for tuition which it makes financial sense to use if possible. Many nursing programs offer course credit for precepting students as well.
Tuition wise, I had to bite the bullet to get my BSN. I had to repay a portion of it because the hospital I received it from closed. I didn't want to transfer to the new facility everyone moved to so.....I didn't complete the two years post graduation.
I still wanted it though.
While I was in a position to take the loss, many others are not. To be frank about it, financially the ADN is the better choice. I got my BSN because I thought I'd eventually want to go into management. By the time I realized that wasn't my future, it would have been silly not to complete thebdegree.
Right now, as things stand obtaining your BSN is a bad choice and good choice at the same time.
The strain you go through time and money wise isn't justified by the gain.
The situation you described, someone looking for employment and hitting a wall........I have seen it to. I've never seen it happen in such a way though that it can, without a doubt, be contributed to lacking a BSN.
I have seen agism, preference for New Grads who cost less (ADN and BSN alike) and health issues keep experienced nurses from landing jobs.
Getting a bsn would depend on various circumstances, for me , getting a BSN is compulsory. Since I want to work in the acute setting for now, most places want a BSN for the new graduates. If you do not have a bsn, most hospitals require a contract thats states that you will complete a bsn program within a certain period of time.
The debate of the value of the BSN is going on for many years. Nearly a 100 years ago the Yale School of Nursing started the BSN with Annie Goodrich based on findings by the Rockefeller foundation, Goldmark Report of 1923. The need for the BSN was on the horizon in 1977 when nurses without a BSN were going to become a "Technical Nurse" by 1985. As you see the nursing shortages at the time squashed that. Will it happen again just might there are a lot of Baby boomers retiring
Now what are the current realities of the necessity of a BSN. Many of the new students from Diploma and ADN schools are not being hired. This is especially true in hospitals who are "Magnet Certified". Some of the Magnet hospitals are developing policies requiring graduates to complete BSN in a defined period of time.
The Nursing career has a great degree of flexibility that revolves around the BSN degree. We all will become over the age at some point when bedside care becomes difficult for the Nurse. This is when the degree may open doors to an administrative or educator role. At this point you may say you do not want to be an administrator but think about the back ache from yesterday.
I started as a Diploma RN. Went on to finish my BSN and on to the MSN. I was fortunate to have the bulk of my tuition paid by the hospital.
Would highly suggest any nurse continue education to BSN or MSN level. One thing I have noticed there are so many Nurses now with an MSN. Soon the DNP or PhD will be the level of administrators.
Yes it is necessary to have a BSN for the future. Easy for me to say sitting here with the paid for MSN .
"Have you even seen what physical and occupational therapists are required to do?? Doctorates. It's crazy." (oncnurseman) And that does not make them any better. My neighbor is my PT. He has your basic PT degree but has been doing it 20+ years. He is AWESOME. Knows so much more than the DPTs I have encountered.
It is about experience. I do think BSN is useful, but I got my ADN, worked and then my job paid for my BSN (I went to a state school with an online program-very inexpensive and a has a great reputation). So glad I did it.
Finishing MSN this semester in a non-clinical field (Informatics)
I had to do an investigation recently, medications were left in a drawer. The nurse that had those patients was pretty sure she gave the medication and thought maybe she drew it up twice. The other med she held but had left prepared, she forgot to throw it out.
This nurse has a family member who has been ill for a long time and in our hospital now, and has kids.
Did stress, exhaustion and working overtime 12 hours have anything to do with this? More than likely yes.
Did having a BSN have anything to do with this? No.
All healthcare workers make a mistake at some point in their career no matter what their education is. The problem is nursing always looks for the holy grail or Hail Mary pass to solve all of their problems. I wish it were that simple.
I believe the BSN studies are flawed, they don't have a large enough sample size to account for the large spectrum of varied and diverse nursing practice throughout the country. Come and do a study where I work and I will believe it.
vintage_RN, BSN, RN
717 Posts
I live in Canada and am an RPN (2 year diploma). I work on a surgical floor and work to full scope. I do the exact same job as my RN colleagues for half the pay. The only thing I dont do on my floor is be assigned to the observation room where there are 3 sicker patients and a nurse that sits in there with them. As you can see, the scope is very wide here compared to some other areas. I went back to school to become an RN, and in Canada you need to have a BScN to become an RN. I became an RN because I have career goals in critical care and where I live, RPNs do not work in critical care. I wrote a lot of papers in my BScN, but I learned how to be a nurse in my RPN program.
What I did learn in my BScN program was leadership...and not every nurse is interested in this. Some people want to go to work and go home. But I learned to be more involved with professional organizations and become invovled in nursing in more of a national level by attending conferences etc. RPNs I find dont have as many organizations representing them and therefore less oppourtunities to be invovled in advocacy and leadership. Since taking my BScN I have been invovled in events that advocate for nurses at a larger level than individual. I also think I added to my knowledge in terms of being able to know best practices, and where to find evidence based resources to inform practice.
It really depends on your career goals. If I wasn't interested in critical care, as well as advocacy and leadership, I probably would have remained an RPN.