Published
56 minutes ago, ORTech2RN said:on the interview panel, there were: 2 RN's (one being the NM), an LPN, social worker and a medical support assistant (clerk).
My former employer had an array of people on the panel, just like this.
On a side note, back in '02 I was the defendant on a $50,000 civil suit case that went to trial. I told my Lawyer, "If the jury is going to be comprised of 'my peers,' at least three need to be Nurses". He replied, "There's not much of a chance of that happening".
Lo and behold, the jury was comprised of three RNs and all I ended up paying was $3500 in legal costs.
I met with one of the RNs after the trial, and she said, "We tried to get you off scot-free, but one Juror wouldn't budge".
The varied approach to situations such as these are sometimes a good idea, but really, only RNs know who, how, and what other RNs are.
I work in an FQHC, and the interviewers are often anyone who has thirty minutes to spare. (The second interview is done by HR.) Our poor nurse manager has been known to interview pharmacy technicians with nobody from the pharmacy team present. Is it a good idea? No, but sometimes you just go with what’s available.
ORTech2RN
109 Posts
My apologies if this has been posted to the incorrect forum. Mods, please move if so.
I was recently interviewed for a position in primary care. I currently work for the VA, so this would have been a lateral move, but a good chance to develop more experience. I was rejected for the position. However, I note on the interview panel, there were: 2 RN's (one being the NM), an LPN, social worker and a medical support assistant (clerk).
Am I missing something, isn't the case that a Nurse should be interviewed by fellow RN's or leadership?