Facilities are firing seasoned, higher paid nurses and utilizing younger less experienced nurses. This cost-cutting measure is putting patients at risk, working nursing and support staff to the point of exhaustion, and causing staff to leave the profession.
Updated:
This article was written by a member on allnurses. Due to the controversial and emotionally charged nature of the article, the member wanted the topic out in the open so nurses could discuss it. Because she is afraid of retribution if any of her hospital administrative staff should read this article and link it back to her, we offered to publish it for her anonymously. Please add your comments regarding this issue negatively impacting nurses and the healthcare system.
I am an experienced nurse that has watched many of my very talented colleagues leave the bedside due to the changes that have taken place in healthcare as of late. I have seen staff cut to the minimum, while patient acuity and nurse to patient ratios increase. I have seen support staff break down in tears because they have not been able to do their jobs properly. I have seen staff pushed to their breaking point, all the while administration stays in their offices, or in the meetings, determining yet more ways they can cut our resources. I see your salaries raised to ridiculous amounts, while we are denied cost of living increases, housekeeping is cut at night, and our benefits cost more, while the services are decreased.
I see our retirement cut while at the same time, the amount matched continues to be diminished or non-existent.
I see ways in which we are constantly blamed for declining patient satisfaction, increased patient falls, late medication administration, all the while we are asked to do more with less. I have seen you fire experienced staff and hire less experienced, cheaper, staff. I have seen that new staff break down because they have no resources, no experience to draw from and I have seen patients suffer from that inexperience. I have seen codes increase, inappropriate admissions to floors, transfers to higher levels of care, all because no one was there initially to advocate for a higher level of care for the patient, to begin with.
I still see you in your office. I do not see you on the floor. I see you with your graphs, your pie charts, your questions about readmission rates when I had already advocated for that patient to stay longer but was simply laughed off by doctors and not supported by you. Yet, somehow, I need to be on a committee to fix the problem.
I am now required to work extra shifts, because staff are getting sick due to stress, or leaving completely because they are tired of dealing with things. I see you develop a culture of fear, where our jobs are at stake and threatened at every turn. Yet, you still look to me for solutions.
"How can we do more with what we have?" I am asked.
My answer: There is no way to do more. We are at our limit. You are losing nurses as fast as you are gaining them, at a time when we need to be building up our profession when the baby boomers are just starting to become a factor in our healthcare environment.
My answer to this is simple. It is time to get real and start valuing your employees. If you want to be reimbursed for patient satisfaction, increase your services. Staff departments with what they need - enough nurses, enough aids, monitor techs, secretaries, ED techs, whatever. Then you will see positive results. Falls will decrease. Medication errors will decrease and medications will be given on time. Patients will get the treatment they deserve and patient satisfaction scores will improve. Your reimbursement will improve and you will stop losing money. Everyone wins: most importantly, the patients.
We need to stop the assembly-line mentality of medicine and return to the service mentality.
Yes, we are a business. But any business that has ever done well has not done well by decreasing the services to people or by mistreating its staff. Otherwise, healthcare facilities are going to see more of the same and suffer more financial penalties, less high-quality staff, and patients will suffer.
I was talking with several of my colleagues just the other day. All of us had many years of experience. Many had been at the bedside for over 20+ years. Many are leaving the bedside due to the unsafe conditions they are seeing. They just don't want to be a part of it. Perhaps this does not scare you, but it should. You must not be a patient yet.
For a follow-up article, please go to Nurses Fight Back! Why Some Hospitals are Despicable
Hospitals Firing Seasoned Nurses_ Nurses FIGHT Back! _ allnurses.pdf
There was once a difference in political parties. Over time, those lines have become blurred to the point where the differences may be hard to see. But I will always be on the side of what is closest to what we had when this 239 yr old nation was born. A little history:
The deliberations of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 were held in strict secrecy. Consequently, anxious citizens gathered outside Independence Hall when the proceedings ended in order to learn what had been produced behind closed doors. The answer was provided immediately. A Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?†With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, A republic, if you can keep it.†(Benjamin Franklin)
Our form of government is a Constitutional Republic not a democracy. This means that anyone with authority under the constitutions, heads of government, are elected as representatives of the people (the sovereign's), and must govern according to the limits of existing Constitutional law. The mandate for a guarantee of a Republican form of government is found at Art. 4 Sec. 4 of the U.S. Constitution.†(George Otto III)
I want government to stay the hell out of my life. I don't want to be told what car I must drive, how long a shower I can take or where I should have my heat and air conditioning set. Now, not only is government saying we must have insurance; they're saying we can only have the type of insurance they say we can have. As I previously stated, with the administration and the HHS Dept. mandating that all plans must contain the 10 essential benefits; nearly 80% of existing plans were outlawed. Now people in their 50s must have a plan that covers pediatric dental, breast-feeding pumps, birth control....... And in case anyone has forgotten, it was this administration that climbed in bed with insurance companies by funneling billions of dollars their way through the "risk corridor" and "reinsurance" programs. It was also this party that after promising over and over and over again that if we had insurance and liked it, nothing would be taken away from us. And then to hear that living fossil Harry Reid say we should be happy to be rid of those crappy plans ( like the one I had for 20 years which gave me more coverage than any of the ACA plans), I realized the depths of lying and stupidity this party engaged in.
And if anyone is in doubt about who is for the wealthy; "From 2009-2012 under Obama, the top 1% captured 95% of income gains" (CNN Money, 9-15-13). Yes that's CNN, the network that supported this administration from the beginning.
The Democratic House majority wanted to push the ACA through before the elections, because they knew they were going to lose the House & would never get the bill passed with a Republican majority. In the immortal words of Nancy Pelosi, "You have to pass the bill to see what's in it."
The ACA is one of the worst things that has happened to healthcare in its entire history. I have a more expensive plan that is worse now than I EVER had before. I am thinking about dropping it to a catastrophic plan & paying for my doctor's office visits out of pocket because that's pretty much what I have right now anyway.
The ACA is just a result of the big insurance companies & big pharma lobbying in Washington for more money & how to get it. Mandating that everyone has insurance, but forcing people to purchase it from a specific list of providers & plans is unconstitutional, but the Supreme Court justices would never rule against it.
Even though all AMERICAN CITIZENS have been ordered to have insurance, the sign in the ED still hangs on the wall: "You have the right to be seen and treated regardless of your ability to pay". Really? Now that every American citizens has been mandated to have insurance, is that sign applicable? Because as I see it, unless you can provide an insurance card, a stack of cash or a credit card with a very high limit, you should not be seen or treated. We all know who is using the ED as a clinic & not paying for it. Why should American citizens have to pay, yet the illegal immigrants don't have insurance cards, cash or a credit card & they still get seen and treated for FREE?????? If I went to Central America for healthcare, I'd have to pay before I walked out the door or else I'd be thrown in jail. Why should it be any different here? Is there any other industry out there besides the healthcare industry where you get your services first & then don't pay for it? Do accountants do your taxes for free? No----they do the taxes but don't file them until you pay. Do builders build your house for free? No---you pay half & then 25% when it is 75% done and then in full when they're done. Do landscapers do your yard for free? No---if you don't pay them for the previous service, they don't come back to do more. Can you go into a grocery store to get food, walk out with 8 bags of food & not pay for it? Hell no!!! WHY SHOULD HEALTHCARE BE ANY DIFFERENT?????
JHARPER13 said:I blame O'butthead and Obama care for the hospitals push to save money. They don't have a choice. Those of you that voted for this "change"....I blame you too. You wanted it, you got it.
Oh bull pucky! This has been going on for way longer than Obama has been president. When they started hiring these young know-it-alls with degrees in "health care administration" straight out of school is when it all started, and that was in the late 1980s-early 1990s. (You want to talk about who was president then?) They are all bean counters with NO knowledge of patient care whatsoever and their only interest is in the *bottom line*. They listen only to the the ANA (nursing lobby) for their recommendations, and that's where the whole BSN thing came from. Now take your hate politics and sit on them, please.
Eloquently said. Agree 100%. Your reference to unionization must be expounded upon, a I feel this is the only way that situation will improve. Nursing has always been fragmented, disgruntled, with an "us against them" mentality. What needs to happen is professional organization that sets Nursing standards of care that are demanded by the organizing body (Union) that can negotiate with "them" ( hospital administration).
NurseDiane said:I agree to an extent.Due to the fact that practically all hospitals from coast to coast currently have a hiring freeze going on, no matter your level of education you won't be hired. So, whether you have an ADN, BSN, MSN, or DNP, you're going to be unemployed. You may get a per diem job as an NP in a primary care office or nursing home, but who wants to do that? You won't get the same job as a physician's assistant would, assisting in surgery or orthopedics or cardiology or neurology. You're better off going to school to be a P.A. It's still a graduate degree program like a an MSN/NP is, but you have far more options than a nurse does.
There was a mass entry into nursing school about 5 to 10 years ago, because a total lie was spread about nursing---that there was a "critical nursing shortage" across the country, and if you went back to nursing school, you'd were "guaranteed" a job upon graduation due to the shortage. Bachelor's degrees were not stressed---2 year programs made a KILLING on this because that is what people thought was all that as needed to be a nurse & get a job. All those people graduated & found a much different story: That there was no nursing shortage & in fact, the opposite was true. There were too many nurses. And then the ACA happened, which further compounded the problem. Those 2 year programs are still around, which should be changed by the folks in Washington: If hospitals won't hire nurses without BSN's, the government should step in & get rid of the 2 year programs. But, it will never happen, and do you know why? Because the federal government makes an OBSCENE amount of money on student loans. They WANT people to default on their loans because it increases their profits through default fees, higher interest rates, and late fees. All this talk about $1 trillion in unpaid student loans is total bullsh**. The student loan industry abounds with corruption at a federal level. When the federal government allows organizations like Sallie Mae to "service" student loans, it is corruption at the highest level. If you're interested in how corrupt the U.S. Department of Education is, Google Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren & read some of her stuff. Read the letters she has written to Congress & Sallie Mae about their relationship that have gone unanswered. Google & read about the $1 million "loan" that Sallie Mae made to Chaka Fattah, a long time Pennsylvania congressman that was running for mayor of Philadelphia. Two political consultants have pleaded guilty to participating in a $1 million campaign laundering scheme on behalf of the Congressman. Albert Lord, the CEO of Sallie Mae, wrote a check directly to a consulting firm working with Fattah because there was a limit to how much a single donation to his campaign could be. Lord's motive with this "loan" was to influence Fattah in Washington & to "spread the word" about Sallie Mae & keep the relationship between the U.S. Dept of Education & Sallie Mae secure. I'm not going to type out the rest of it because you can look it up yourself-----but if you don't think financial corruption is at the very core of higher education and healthcare, you had better re-examine your thinking. It is a very tangled web, indeed. The thing is, most people don't know about it or care to know about it.
In 2014, Sallie Mae "agreed" to pay the feds $200 million in penalties for cheating active duty troops & charging them unlawful late fees when they were called to active duty. There was a lot of pressure from politicians for the U.S. Department of Education to sever its ties with Sallie Mae due to their ongoing schemes, but guess what? Sallie Mae is still contracted by the U.S. Dept. of Education to "service" student loans. Just follow the money, folks. It's very simple.
After all these nurses went back & got 2 year degrees, the whole "Magnet" program started, and every hospital across the country was falling over themselves to be designated a "Magnet Hospital". It is impressive to the public that their hospital is a "Magnet" hospital, and they automatically think the nursing care is better. The truth of the matter is that hospitals can say that all of their nurses have doctorate degrees----if there are not enough nurses working on the units & the units are grossly understaffed with very acute patients & high patient-to-nurse ratios, the care will be horrendous. People only find this out when they're admitted to a hospital. You don't hear about the problem on the news because "they" don't want people to know about it. "They" (meaning the liberal media) don't want the public to know that the ACA further destroyed healthcare as we knew it to be---it mandated huge staffing cuts by facilities because of the sh***y reimbursement from Medicare & the insurance companies. "They" want people to think that the ACA was the greatest thing to happen to this country since the end of World War 2, and that's the furthest thing from the real truth.
When a patient is admitted to the hospital, there is one question that a person is asked, either by the admitting person or by a nurse, and that question is "Have you been admitted to a hospital within the last 30 days?" Do you know this question is asked? Because Medicare/insurance companies will not pay for a hospital admission if it is within a 30 day period of time. All of those patients in the ED holding area on "observation status"? They are there in "observation" because the hospital won't be paid if they are admitted. Here's a kicker too: Medicare/insurance companies won't pay for an "observation" either, so the patient finds a big, fat bill in their mailbox a couple of weeks later. This ACA was directly responsible for this. So, patients are discharged before they're ready to go home because Medicare/insurance companies have "menus" for what is an "appropriate" admission time for each diagnosis. Patients are discharged whether they're ready to go or not, and then if they decompensate at home & end up back in the ED, it is a battle between the patient, doctor, hospital & Medicare/insurance company to get them re-admitted. You're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't. Doctors & hospitals are caught up in the web of government regulations that result in poor quality patient care.
But, let's blame the nurses for poor quality care. It's all their fault.
So, for those who think that a "national union" will help nurses, think again. The root of the problem goes much father than you could ever imagine, and until a national nurses union is formed that donates a CRAP TON of money to the politicians in Washington, nothing will ever change. The teachers have a strong union because of their political ties. I find it ironic how a hospital won't get a nurse to cover a sick call, and the extra work is just put on the backs of the nurses already working, but when a teacher calls out sick, a substitute teacher is assigned to that class. Why should nursing be any different than that? If the school did not have a teacher for the class, they would not get federal/state funding for that day. Why shouldn't a hospital be penalized when they don't cover a sick call? They're getting federal/state money too. Oh, that's right----an education is a RIGHT for American citizens, but health care is not a right, it's a privilege. Disagree with that statement if you choose, but it is absolutely true.
I know this post is already long enough, but I just have to tell this story. When I worked at a major NYC hospital many years ago, there was a cardiac surgeon who was brilliant. He did adults, pediatrics, valve replacements & was one of the first surgeons in the world to do a CABG. However, his personality was that of a drill sergeant with bi-polar disorder. He always had a scowl on his face, walked around in wooden clogs with the rubber soles worn off, so one could hear him "clop, clop, clop" all the way down the hall. I wouldn't hesitate to have this man operate on my heart if I needed it, even though his bedside manner was atrocious. The way I look at it, I didn't have to be his friend, go to lunch with him, go to his house for dinner----all he had to do was his job, at which he was brilliant. He didn't have to impress me with smiles & laughter----his reputation spoke for itself. I'm not condoning being a nasty nurse--but the job you do matters a whole lot more than how accommodating you are for the personal demands from patients. How you manage your patient load is more important than serving hot coffee at 8am. How you change dressings, or start IV's, or interpret monitors or do your part during a code is more important than fluffing somebody's pillows before they go to sleep. When the actual JOB of nursing is appreciated more than the big smiles & "What can I do for you?", maybe things will change.
Medicare was denying payment for patients readmitted for CHF prior to ACA passing.
I'm in home health so the local hospital has been working with us before ACA to reduce admissions. I remember the main DC planner coming to speak with us about it, went through the whole lack of reimbursement for readmissions and observation holds. They now have a formal case mgmt program in place but they were talking with us years ago about it. I believe it's been a Medicare thing, not an ACA thing.
Honestly, there were some pretty big holes in the DC process leaving the patient hanging without solid out patient mgmt set up, I can see why things had to be tightened up. Sucks with the very fragile end stage patients but there were also some blatant misses that cannot be ignored now.
This is precisely why I left bedside nursing 30 years ago. I worked at the largest hospital in the country and I am not kidding when I say that there were 5 nurses for every "vice-president". Every time the budget had to be realigned, it was nursing that was cut, not the number of non-patient care delivering "suits". I was the only full-time RN on a 2 bed renal transplant unit. High acuity you'd say? Not according to hospital staffing. More evening than I care to think about I would have 1, just 1, LPN and, if I was lucky, a nursing assistant and we rarely had an empty bed. Often after a busy holiday weekend we'd get as many as 4 fresh transplant patients out of ICU, where they stayed for anywhere from 4-24 hours post-op. I was charge nurse, care giver, and patient counselor and in my spare time, I rounded with as many as 4 medical and surgical teams, verified orders, started IV's gave IVP meds, passed all meds to "my" patients, charted on "my" patients, received patients from recovery and ended up nearly dying from a stress-related cardiac arrhythmia. Thankfully, that resolved as soon as I left bedside nursing and went into clinical research (no stress there) and retired from nursing as a very experienced but old office nurse. Keep up the good fight. Things will change. I'm optimistic that way.
The whole thing is a catch-22. Medicare/insurance companies have DRG's that must be followed, so patients are discharged long before they should be discharged. But, if they're admitted within 30 days for the same problem, no reimbursement. It's just so Medicare/insurance companies don't have to pay out for their own B.S. discharge rules. Getting an acute CHF into the ER, jacking them up with some lasix, putting them in the hallway on a monitor in "observation" status & discharging them in 24 hours is not quality care. It is business in a for-profit industry. As long as healthcare is run as a for-profit business, nothing is going to change. Nurses want to take care of people, but that is impossible when the patient load is too much, there is too much documentation with the sole purpose of "saving" the facility in case of a lawsuit, acuity is too high & there is absolutely no support from administration.
nursel56
7,122 Posts
The ANA can't "make" anybody do anything. In fact, their intransigent attitude toward mandated ratios (they're against them) is why there is the new union that excludes LVN/LPNs who, as I mentioned in a different thread, fought side by side in California to get the ratio law passed.
Their refusal to adopt a strategy that didn't insult the intelligence and education of ADN nurses for 50 years is, among other factors, why there is very little cooperation among different factions in nursing today.
One of their own publications published an article that analyzed exactly why the mandatory BSN campaign failed for decades, yet they did not change course as a result of that. It always amuses me to hear them talk about "evidence-based practice" all the while when it comes to their own BSN campaign they were the ultimate "keep on doing what doesn't work" crowd.