Updated: Published
Not the first time this has happened in UK. Beverly Allitt killed several children on a paediatric unit:
https://www.amazon.fr/Murder-Ward-Four-Biggest-Criminal/dp/0701148136
There is a problem where whistleblowers are sometimes ignored and seen as trouble makers, until it's all too late. I'm not sure this is a specifically British problem. We had a case in France of a nurse finishing people off in old people's homes.
We are in a great position of trust and it's extremely hard to know how to strike that balance of policing professionals' behaviour while having confidence in their professional autonomy. Hopefully lessons will be learned.
The book about Allitt is a striking example of how NOT to do things. Allitt was a newly qualified SEN (equivalent LVN/LPN) in her very first post often left in a position where you would have expected to find a qualified registered nurse with the specialist paediatric qualification. I am not undermining the capabilities of second level nurses such as SENs or LPNs, but such an inexperienced new nurse in a specialist area should have been working under greater supervision than she was. Though at the end of the day, her qualifications and experience have little bearing on the fact that she was a psychopath.
I wonder what sort of mental condition causes someone to do such an aberrant crime? It's hard to wrap one's head around this. The woman was by all appearances a normal, nice young professional. There was nothing to be gained by these twisted and evil acts. What is the inner life of someone like this?
Think of the human mammal as an animal, each with their own wired personality. In many species of animals, one or both parents, even the other adult animals for that matter, will eat the young. We say it is instinct, that they are driven by neural processes due to millions of years of evolution.
An argument may be given in that the human animal possesses a higher consciousness which is guided by a conscience, rules guidelines, and laws, yet these so-called aberrant behaviors continue in every class and society.
The vast majority is in denial of the power of instincts, hormones, or other typical human functions and the subsequent behavioral reactions. This denial concept could also explain the apathetic inactions of those who are aware of these crimes.
Edgar Cayce said something along the lines of, "That which drives the greatest good can also result in the worst evil".
Attention seekers are fulfilled due to the response of others- they crave that response- whereas a sociopath (an archaic term, replaced by antisocial) are apathetic and often comfortable with their behavior.
If we think of a behavior in which we are driven and don't need to deal with the ramifications thereof, we will continue that behavior. This is not only a rule of behavior, but also a law of physics.
Emergent said:I don't think this was attention seeking behavior. Lucy was very secretive in her morbid
I meant attention-seeking in the sympathy she received from coworkers because she was the "poor nurse" who took care of all these patients. The attention she received from fellow nurses and some physicians was I'm sure very validating.
klone said:I meant attention-seeking in the sympathy she received from coworkers because she was the "poor nurse" who took care of all these patients. The attention she received from fellow nurses and some physicians was I'm sure very validating.
Gotcha. Yes, some nurses have killed in order to be heroes, or be where the action is. They haven't gone into great detail whether that was an aspect of her motive.
Emergent said:I wonder what sort of mental condition causes someone to do such an aberrant crime? It's hard to wrap one's head around this. The woman was by all appearances a normal, nice young professional. There was nothing to be gained by these twisted and evil acts. What is the inner life of someone like this?
I'd say sociopath is at least 1.
Emergent, RN
4,304 Posts
Hospital bosses ignored months of doctors' warnings about Lucy Letby---BBC