Published
I would consider it ... but that doesn't mean I would take it. I would read the contract VERY carefully and have it reviewed by a lawyer to be sure I understood all of the possibilities associated with that contract. In particular, I would be thinking through all the "What if ...?" possibile scenarios and making sure that I was OK with them before signing such a contract.
In particular, I'd be looking closely at what my obligations would be if things didn't work out. For example: If I chose to leave after 9 months because I hated it, what would happen? Would I have to pay them money? If so, how much? Is it an amount that I could save up and set aside "just in case?" Or would I be working for a lower wage during those first few months (expecting a bonus after 1 year) and leaving early would simply mean that I would not get that bonus -- or other incentives at later points?
Different contracts are structured differently -- and my decision would be based on the specifics of that contract.
Wow that's worse than an apartment lease or a cell phone company! Who wants to be locked in that long to any thing…. I dunno, I understand that employee retention is critical but there has to be other ways to get employees to stay other than throwing a "you owe" back at them.
How about a welcoming staff or incentives??
Not feeling the punitive approach. Hopefully the contract has legitimate outs like significant other relocation or something of that nature.
Thank you for the advice. All I know at this point is that if you leave at theMy contract states I have to pay 6k if I leave before 2 years. It's not ideal, but it is the only offer I got lol. I have the option of transferring in-house after a year though, so if my floor isn't working out I have some flexibility. 10k is just so much money to gamble with.
My new grad program has a 2-year commitment (3 months of which is official "orientation", with the new graduate program running a full year from the start date) to the facility. The penalty for leaving before the contract is up is 3.5k and it is not pro-rated.
For many people, this was the equivalent of about a year's worth of PTOs and so if they found an opportunity somewhere else, they didn't mind not cashing out their PTOs and paying a little bit to go after it. As a new graduate, I think the program is pretty well-structured and I really don't blame the hospital for trying to get something out of their investment.
I would consider the reputation of the program. If it is decent, I'd do it since I'd want to start working as soon as possible. I didn't really have the luxury of waiting and considering other options with my loans hanging over my head, but perhaps you're in a better position than I am. Best of luck deciding!
lifelearningrn, BSN, RN
2,622 Posts
I have an interview this week with a hospital that has a new graduate program. This is a job I was reluctant to apply for (but did anyway) because it requires a 3 year contract. What do you guys think? Would you consider it?