Published
for a labor union June 21 - 22 http://www.calnurse.org/media-center/press-releases/2006/may/page.jsp?itemID=27765028 :smiley_ab http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/daily/local/14075.php
NO, they're too busy looking out for themselves. Nurses are just how they finance that.~faith,
Timothy.
Timothy ... you have some legitimate criticisms of unions but, this is going too far. CNA is NOT just out for themselves. They got the first ratio law passed in this country which benefits 80 percent of the nurses in California who do NOT belong to a union and who do not pay union dues.
If CNA only cared about themselves, they'd negotiate ratios in their contracts for their membership ONLY and would never bother to pass a law that benefits every nurse in this state. A law ... BTW ... which took them five years to pass, and that CNA had to spend tons of money defending in court multiple times for the benefit of ALL California nurses, union or not.
I wish you would talk to some travelers who've worked both states. The patient loads they get in Arizona are much higher than what they get in California because of that law.
Yes, unions have their flaws, as do all organizations. But let's give some credit where credit is due here.
:typing
Unfortunately, achieving a uniform/national consensus on all nursing issues is nearly impossible. Just look at the diversity of strongly held beliefs on this board. But uniting around key issues - pay, benefits, and working conditions - is much easier. That is why unions have a national organization (unite around key issues) and "locals" - where contracts are negotiated on the local level.
almost a 2:1 margin...
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3928/is_200307/ai_n9261470
Ion
109 Posts
Nurses for nurses.