Trump, the suspect of multiple federal investigations and investigations in multiple states, twice impeached and removed from officeby the American voters in 2020, COMPLETE SORE LOSER (He is the definition of an entitled snowflake because he whines over a loss that he pretends he won), unpatriotic white nationalist TRASH and authoritarian dictator wannabe (he wants to destroy our democracy while political GQP hacks and trash/clown media (I.e. Fox Noise and white nationalist media outlets) mimic his stupidity) Is raided by the FBI:
Meanwhile, you never clarified your own perspective. Are you a MAGA follower who refers to your own movement by another word? If yes, why keep it a secret?
Or are you a non-MAGA who is choosing to become indignant over what you perceive to be an insult to a group to which you don’t belong? If yes, how woke you are!
There is plenty of evidence here of my positions on different issues. But you and others keep wanting to ignore certain things and emphasize, exaggerate, and lie about others.
It's much easier to defend or feel comfortable about your own views if you can villify those with other perspectives.
I've learned that many libtards aren't interested in my discussion. Rather, they'll lazyly attribute my views to being brainwashed by Fox News, or my "Dear Leader" Trump, or criticize my sources, insult my intellect, etc.
And, before you're offended by "libtard", you may want to remember your recent frequent use of "magaphile".
To others who may want to report me, you may want to consider how hypocritical that would be as you were silent and didn't call out this person as she continues to name-call with this offensive term.
In my opinion ”magaphile” is a neutral word. It describes someone who is a lover of MAGA. It’s a useful word if you specifically want to describe a person who is a supporter of Donald Trump while at the same time being clear that you don’t mean every single person who is a conservative or a Republican. There are conservatives who aren’t magaphiles.
Libtard on the other hand is 100% pejorative. It’s clearly intended to be insulting.
If I were to use for example the terms ”maggotphile” or ”rumptard”, then I would be aiming to offend . Do you see the difference between words that are intended to be offensive and those that simply aim to describe something?
Do you like children? By your logic, you then wouldn't be offended if I called you a pedophile, I guess.
You said you coined the phrase. Just a coincidence you used "- phile" when by far the most commonly used word with that suffix is pedophile. But, you coined it in a effort to not be pejoritive.
Sure.
I find your post rather revealing. I absolutely love reading books. I wouldn’t mind being called a ”bibliophile”. The shoe kind of fits ? I definitely do not want to have sex with children and find the idea revolting, so it’s logical that I’d be extremely angry and offended if someone called me a ”pedophile”.
The suffix -phile has no inherent powers to offend. I t s connotation is completely neutral. It’s the prefix that matters, and noteveryperson’smind jumps instantly to ”pedophile”.
The only question is.. What does admiration of all things MAGA and Trump mean to you? Is it like loving to read books and increasing your knowledge and understanding of the world, or is it like committing disgusting crimes against children? I’m trying to understand why you appear to be offended by a suffix? You seem quite sensitive for someone who uses a word like ”libtard” to describe people whom you do not agree with.
In my opinion ”magaphile” is a neutral word. It describes someone who is a lover of MAGA. It’s a useful word if you specifically want to describe a person who is a supporter of Donald Trump while at the same time being clear that you don’t mean every single person who is a conservative or a Republican. There are conservatives who aren’t magaphiles.
Libtard on the other hand is 100% pejorative. It’s clearly intended to be insulting.
If I were to use for example the terms ”maggotphile” or ”rumptard”, then I would be aiming to offend . Do you see the difference between words that are intended to be offensive and those that simply aim to describe something?
I find your post rather revealing. I absolutely love reading books. I wouldn’t mind being called a ”bibliophile”. The shoe kind of fits ? I definitely do not want to have sex with children and find the idea revolting, so it’s logical that I’d be extremely angry and offended if someone called me a ”pedophile”.
The suffix -phile has no inherent powers to offend. I t s connotation is completely neutral. It’s the prefix that matters, and noteveryperson’smind jumps instantly to ”pedophile”.
The only question is.. What does admiration of all things MAGA and Trump mean to you? Is it like loving to read books and increasing your knowledge and understanding of the world, or is it like committing disgusting crimes against children? I’m trying to understand why you appear to be offended by a suffix? You seem quite sensitive for someone who uses a word like ”libtard” to describe people whom you do not agree with.
Yes that's terrible! I would never call a person with mental disabilities a liberal. That's hate speech.
Hi there new member. Funny that you should pick my rather insignificant posts to start replying to… I swear, there are times when new posters feel like old posters…
Anyhoo…
I didn’t realize that ”libo” is a word, but no, I surely wouldn’t be offended by it. An English teacher might be though..
If you want, you could also call me a fascistophobe. It’s kind of the same thing as a ”libophile”, so that works as well.
1 hour ago, Tisutina said:
Yes that's terrible! I would never call a person with mental disabilities a library. That's hate speech.
Hi there new member. Funny that you should pick my rather insignificant posts to start replying to… I swear, there are times when new posters feel like old posters…
Anyhoo…
I didn’t realize that ”libo” is a word, but no, I surely wouldn’t be offended by it. An English teacher might be though..
If you want, you could also call me a fascistophobe. It’s kind of the same thing as a ”libophile”, so that works as well.
Yeah, now you’re trying a bit too hard.
All post have significance. Hence the person taking time to post them.Are you saying yours are not? Should I consider your posts insignificant and not reply to them?
Old posters you say? Has there been several who challenge your ideas in these threads? Thus far I see one.
Do you have a phobia of fascist or a phobia of opinions that are different than yours? Personally I am not afraid of fascist. I think those who do not accept diverse opinions are irrelevant and foolish and ofen hypocritical.
Beerman, BSN
4,427 Posts
There is plenty of evidence here of my positions on different issues. But you and others keep wanting to ignore certain things and emphasize, exaggerate, and lie about others.
It's much easier to defend or feel comfortable about your own views if you can villify those with other perspectives.