I would like opinions please on what you think about a practice being enacted by a professor of mine. Basically, she is putting other professors'/classes material on her tests.
Example: last test, there was an ABG question on her test in which we had to interpret ABGs and pick the top priority patient. We had never gone over ABGs in her class, but had gotten halfway through learning them in our med surg class at the time of the test. However, we had only learned how to interpret them on a chalk board, and never interpreted them as applied to a patient before. In addition, we had not yet been tested on them in the med surg class in which we learned them. So, 100% of the class failed the ABG question and she ended up giving it back to us as an extra point, but said she believe it was a fair question and will be putting material from other classes on future exams as well.
In class this morning, she asked how far we had gotten in med surg and what we had covered because she was making her next test and wanted to know what to put on it. We told her what we had covered, but that we were mid-lecture on some things and had also not yet been tested out on them. She stated that she did not care and that if it had been lectured on, it was fair game.
Is this true? Can we really be tested on any material from any class in another class, regardless of whether it has ever been covered in that class? I do understand that in clinicals, we have to put information from all classes together and synthesize it cohesively in order to be able to comprehend the full clinical picture of your patient. However, I was under the understanding that in the classroom setting, the reason we take separate classes and learn material bit by bit is so that we can absorb an overwhelming amount of information bit by bit and learn how to put it together gradually... not all at once.
So, what do you all think? Fair or not fair?
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
I would like opinions please on what you think about a practice being enacted by a professor of mine. Basically, she is putting other professors'/classes material on her tests.
Example: last test, there was an ABG question on her test in which we had to interpret ABGs and pick the top priority patient. We had never gone over ABGs in her class, but had gotten halfway through learning them in our med surg class at the time of the test. However, we had only learned how to interpret them on a chalk board, and never interpreted them as applied to a patient before. In addition, we had not yet been tested on them in the med surg class in which we learned them. So, 100% of the class failed the ABG question and she ended up giving it back to us as an extra point, but said she believe it was a fair question and will be putting material from other classes on future exams as well.
In class this morning, she asked how far we had gotten in med surg and what we had covered because she was making her next test and wanted to know what to put on it. We told her what we had covered, but that we were mid-lecture on some things and had also not yet been tested out on them. She stated that she did not care and that if it had been lectured on, it was fair game.
Is this true? Can we really be tested on any material from any class in another class, regardless of whether it has ever been covered in that class? I do understand that in clinicals, we have to put information from all classes together and synthesize it cohesively in order to be able to comprehend the full clinical picture of your patient. However, I was under the understanding that in the classroom setting, the reason we take separate classes and learn material bit by bit is so that we can absorb an overwhelming amount of information bit by bit and learn how to put it together gradually... not all at once.
So, what do you all think? Fair or not fair?