The beginning of shift, I receive a report on a cancer patient, a&ox1, with prostate ca with mets to brain and bone
Last week the patient was a&ox3-4, yelling for pain medication. He has been on a ketamine gtt and morphine IV. They had dc'd the morphine IV and switched it to po. Beginning of my shift the pt was asking for his po morphine ( which was scheduled for 2100, which I provided). A couple hours later the cp assessed his vs, she states highest was sbp. I do my assessment and find systolic 75 with a map of 45. I immediately tell my charge and call the md who orders a 250ml bolus, I hold the ketamine infusion and call supportive care who states it's OK to cont ketamine. I reassess his vitals, map 63 and sbp 93. Pt is still a&ox1, vss at this time.
Around 6 am, which is 4.5 hrs later than my last vitals assessment the cp takes the bp again and it's sbp 75 with a low map but this time the patient isn't responsive. At 4am upon rounding on the patient he was responsive to me.
We call a rapid response. The room was a mess and the pt had a bm which I didn't have time to clean yet and we had drew labs, started a new line, bolus and mitten restraints. We also narcanned him and stopped the ketamine. Throughout my shift I held his scheduled po morphine rt his 1x episode of hypotension.
Dayshift charge comes in aggressively towards me stating the vitals are every 4 hrs and 6am vitals are too late. She also states we should've called a rapid at 0000, but from my perspective is that I received the order for the fluids and it works- also his orientation had not changed and he was asymptomatic.
At 0700, change of shift I was trying to give report and clean the room up as well as document
Dayshift called another rapid on the patient before I left, the charge RN was making snarky comments on what had happened on my shift and how "We don't leave patients with a blood pressure of 75". The patient was non responsive again.
What could (as a nurse) could I have been done differently to prevent such an instance or is this a case of workplace violence?
The beginning of shift, I receive a report on a cancer patient, a&ox1, with prostate ca with mets to brain and bone
Last week the patient was a&ox3-4, yelling for pain medication. He has been on a ketamine gtt and morphine IV. They had dc'd the morphine IV and switched it to po. Beginning of my shift the pt was asking for his po morphine ( which was scheduled for 2100, which I provided). A couple hours later the cp assessed his vs, she states highest was sbp. I do my assessment and find systolic 75 with a map of 45. I immediately tell my charge and call the md who orders a 250ml bolus, I hold the ketamine infusion and call supportive care who states it's OK to cont ketamine. I reassess his vitals, map 63 and sbp 93. Pt is still a&ox1, vss at this time.
Around 6 am, which is 4.5 hrs later than my last vitals assessment the cp takes the bp again and it's sbp 75 with a low map but this time the patient isn't responsive. At 4am upon rounding on the patient he was responsive to me.
We call a rapid response. The room was a mess and the pt had a bm which I didn't have time to clean yet and we had drew labs, started a new line, bolus and mitten restraints. We also narcanned him and stopped the ketamine. Throughout my shift I held his scheduled po morphine rt his 1x episode of hypotension.
Dayshift charge comes in aggressively towards me stating the vitals are every 4 hrs and 6am vitals are too late. She also states we should've called a rapid at 0000, but from my perspective is that I received the order for the fluids and it works- also his orientation had not changed and he was asymptomatic.
At 0700, change of shift I was trying to give report and clean the room up as well as document
Dayshift called another rapid on the patient before I left, the charge RN was making snarky comments on what had happened on my shift and how "We don't leave patients with a blood pressure of 75". The patient was non responsive again.
What could (as a nurse) could I have been done differently to prevent such an instance or is this a case of workplace violence?