Bedside Nurses: Undervalued, Poorly Retained and What Experts Say

Healthcare is experiencing a shrinking pool of bedside nurses. Poor work conditions, high patient ratios and inadequate pay are just a few reasons why nurses are turning away from the bedside. This article will take a look at what nurse leaders say and have implemented to retain skilled and experienced nurses. Nurses General Nursing Article

Updated:  

In hospitals across the country, experienced nurses provide orientation to an ever-revolving door of new hires. The need to retain beside nurses is well known and solutions widely researched. Yet, work conditions in acute care settings are slow to improve and many nurses turn away (or run) from bedside nursing.

According to NSI Nursing Solutions, Inc., hospitals saw the highest turnover rates in 2018 when compared to the last 10 years. From 2014-2018, hospitals turned over a staggering average of 87.7% of staff. While most hospitals identify nurse retention in key strategic planning, it is not followed through in operational practice and planning. According to the report, only 43.2% of hospitals have put their strategic plan into formal retention strategies.

Do Graduate Programs Play a Role?

I recently read an editorial, authored by Maureen Kennedy, MA RN FAAN in the American Journal of Nursing, questioning if the push by colleges for students to attend graduate or doctorate nurse practitioner programs is contributing to the devaluing of bedside nurses. Research has clearly shown hospital working conditions to be the primary reason nurses are leaving the bedside. Most of us have experienced long hours, lack of flexibility and poor leadership while working in acute care at some point in our careers. And, the large need for advanced practice nurses in today’s healthcare environment, as well as the need for qualified nurse faculty, is undisputed.

Hospitals typically don’t have work environments that offer nurse autonomy or promote professional practices. Nurses may see an advanced degree as offering job opportunities that are more supportive, with greater autonomy and less stress. The editorial’s author summarized the issue by quoting a colleague:

Quote

“The narrative must be shifted to embrace the full range of roles and contributions of all nurses. Our healthcare system depends upon a well-trained, experienced workforce. The trend toward our hospitals being primarily populated with nurses with less than two years’ experience is worrisome”. If hospitals want to retain nurses long-term, workplace environments need to change and demonstrate the value of bedside nurses."

Keeping Nurses at the Bedside

Healthleaders magazine recently published an article sharing what three nurse executives did to retain RNs with the right skills and experience needed to deliver high quality care. Here are a few of the ways the executives improved their facility’s retention rates for the long haul.

Improve the Organizations Reputation

Rush Oak Park Hospital in Illinois was plagued with a negative reputation because of consistently poor quality outcomes. The hospital’s reputation bled into the work environment resulting in nurse dissatisfaction. In addition, there was a “revolving door” of chief nursing officers leading to inconsistent leadership and vision. Karen Mayer, chief nursing officer, knew the work environment needed to change and hospital leadership was up to the challenge. Over a period of years, leadership worked to improve quality indicators to improve patient care and nursing job satisfaction. After many years, turnover rates decreased from 22% to just 8.3%.

Entice Nurses Back to the Bedside

Press Ganey’s 2017 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators RN Survey found newly licensed nurses and those who have been in practice 2-4 years at highest risk for attrition. Claire M. Zangerie, chief nursing executive at Allegheny Health Network saw the same trend within her organization. Under her direction, the RetuRN to Practice Program was created to address some of the issues leading to attrition. The program was designed to attract nurses who have stepped away from nursing and want to return to the bedside. As a result, the workload of all nursing staff was successfully lessened.

Attract nurses with flexible scheduling

RetuRN participants offer managers at least 3 hours availability at any time, on any day, day shift or night or any weekend or holiday. The nurses help ease workload in high need areas and perform “rover-type” duties, such as admissions, discharges, patient education, covering other nurses’ patients for breaks or for continuing education. Extensive on-boarding, remediation, training and support is offered to RetuRN participants to ease the transition back to the bedside.

Support Professional Development and Work Environment

Kelly Johnson, vice president, patient care services and chief nursing officer at Stanford Children’s Health understands a healthy work environment and professional development programs are critical to retaining nurses. Therefore, Johnson developed and implemented several programs to support nurses in various stages of their career. Nurses have opportunities to continue growing through personal success plans, a succession planning development program, certificate and advanced degree programs.

The organization has also committed to creating a healthy work environment and culture. This includes initiatives embracing HeartMath concepts that empower employees to “self regulate emotions and behaviors to reduce stress, increase resilience, and unlock their natural intuitive guidance for making more effective choices”. The goal is to create a work environment that is caring and healing, where nurses care for each other and themselves.

What programs or initiatives have you experienced that improved the work environment of bedside nurses?

Additional Resources

NSI Nursing Solutions 2019 National Healthcare Retention Report

Want to Keep Nurses at the Bedside? Here’s How

Nurses at the Bedside - Who Will Be Left To Care?

Specializes in Cardiology.
2 minutes ago, morelostthanfound said:

^^^Agree with this. I don't think anyone is disputing the necessity/importance of senior administrators or the slim profit margins of hospital systems some years. Rather, most nurses take issue with the enormous salaries, benefit packages, and golden parachutes that upper management have rewarded themselves with while the worker bees continue to be unappreciated, overworked, and dangerously overextended.

Bingo.

12 minutes ago, OUxPhys said:

That’s all well and good but its not justification to reward yourself and then stiff the people doing the actual physical work.

Do you work as an administrator?

No it hasnt. It was once focused on caring for the patient. That’s not the case anymore.

No, I am not an administrator is any sense. Just someone who wishes to improve healthcare. I have tried very hard to look at hospitals as a holistic system and understand how that system actually works. I have worked hard to make changes in my specialty and in that process have come to gain a better understanding of the system I guess.

It has always been and always will be a business. Even Nightingale and her staff in the Crimea were paid.

I understand what you mean though, things were not so fiscally focused as they are now. Things changed in the 1980's with the adoption of the PPS MS-DRG system. I personally believe, and I believe there is very strong supporting evidence, that the cost containment strategies used by CMS are the primary cause of the current staffing and funding shortage.

Specializes in Cardiology.
3 minutes ago, Asystole RN said:

No, I am not an administrator is any sense. Just someone who wishes to improve healthcare. I have tried very hard to look at hospitals as a holistic system and understand how that system actually works. I have worked hard to make changes in my specialty and in that process have come to gain a better understanding of the system I guess.

It has always been and always will be a business. Even Nightingale and her staff in the Crimea were paid.

I understand what you mean though, things were not so fiscally focused as they are now. Things changed in the 1980's with the adoption of the PPS MS-DRG system. I personally believe, and I believe there is very strong supporting evidence, that the cost containment strategies used by CMS are the primary cause of the current staffing and funding shortage.

When I say its a business I mean they care about profits. Its not about the patient now despite how many times they may say “its all about the patient”. Its not. It wasnt always like this.

I do believe CMS and insurance plays a role in that they both under-reimburse and is one of the reasons why we are in the situation we are in.

6 minutes ago, Secretperson said:

As a hospital nursing administrator, I would never recommend going to a nursing leadership convention or meeting to discuss operations within healthcare. If You truly want to know how it all works meet with your ELT, and operations leadership, you will find that nursing leadership does play part of the operations, but just a small piece, and outside of nursing itself they have very little influence.

Uh oh, you are the overpaid devil who does nothing.

Most floor nurses generally do not have the personal connections or political ability to meet and ask the hard questions to their own operations leadership. Kind of off-putting when the first questions will likely center around staffing.

I was thinking an outside nursing leadership organization would be better to network with since they can ask the hard questions without personally offending the person being questioned and nursing leadership, while not operations, does have a better understanding of operations and they would have a common background.

In my experience, it is generally not easy for nurses to discuss business operations with non-nurses. There just is not enough of a common base.

Specializes in Cardiology.
5 minutes ago, Asystole RN said:

Uh oh, you are the overpaid devil who does nothing.

Most floor nurses generally do not have the personal connections or political ability to meet and ask the hard questions to their own operations leadership. Kind of off-putting when the first questions will likely center around staffing.

I was thinking an outside nursing leadership organization would be better to network with since they can ask the hard questions without personally offending the person being questioned and nursing leadership, while not operations, does have a better understanding of operations and they would have a common background.

In my experience, it is generally not easy for nurses to discuss business operations with non-nurses. There just is not enough of a common base.

Well since I am just a floor nurse, yeah, safe staffing is my biggest concern because Im not losing my license because a hospital decided to be cheap and dangerously understaffed.

You nailed it on the head though. We dont have the politically savy...nor should we. Politics has no business in healthcare but unfortunately its a primary factor.

1 minute ago, OUxPhys said:

When I say its a business I mean they care about profits. Its not about the patient now despite how many times they may say “its all about the patient”. Its not. It wasnt always like this.

I do believe CMS and insurance plays a role in that they both under-reimburse and is one of the reasons why we are in the situation we are in.

I get what you mean, the emphasis on the bottom line is greater today than it ever has been. Ever wonder why that is? Ever wonder why even non-profits are very focused on the bottom line?

I do not know how old you are but if you do not remember how things were in the early 80s I would recommend you ask someone who does, things changed in the mid to late 80's. Things especially changed after 2010.

3 minutes ago, Asystole RN said:

Uh oh, you are the overpaid devil who does nothing.

Ouch! I do ok;) seriously though, ANA and AONL are academic think tanks they say a lot but have very little influence on the actual operations and improvements in nursing (education push for example). Things could improve for all of us, but as you can see in this thread it would seriously compromise many people at the top when it comes to their paychecks.

1 minute ago, OUxPhys said:

Well since I am just a floor nurse, yeah, safe staffing is my biggest concern because Im not losing my license because a hospital decided to be cheap and dangerously understaffed.

You nailed it on the head though. We dont have the politically savy...nor should we. Politics has no business in healthcare but unfortunately its a primary factor.

Politics is everything.

Gone of the days when you could focus on a single system for your patient. When you asses a post CABG are you only assessing his cardiac status? Today we know we have to be holistic and assess the entire patient. Not only that, we have to educate and assess for their ability to sustain their care at home as well to improve total outcomes.

If you care about staffing, you need to care about those who influence your staffing. You have to understand their motivations and the reasons why they do what they do.

Just complaining about staffing doesn't do anything. If you want to change staffing go after the root cause...and the admin is not the root cause.

8 minutes ago, Asystole RN said:

Uh oh, you are the overpaid devil who does nothing.

Most floor nurses generally do not have the personal connections or political ability to meet and ask the hard questions to their own operations leadership. Kind of off-putting when the first questions will likely center around staffing.

I was thinking an outside nursing leadership organization would be better to network with since they can ask the hard questions without personally offending the person being questioned and nursing leadership, while not operations, does have a better understanding of operations and they would have a common background.

In my experience, it is generally not easy for nurses to discuss business operations with non-nurses. There just is not enough of a common base.

I'm not sure it's necessary for staff nurses to even possess a rudimentary knowledge of operational leadership or corporate finance. What my nursing colleagues working in the trenches do know, is that their wages have been stagnant for years, their benefits are subpar, and their nurse/patient ratios are dangerous by anyone's standard. Most nurses are well aware that these hospital executives and stuffed shirts are making exorbitant salaries, perks, bennies....

Specializes in Cardiology.
5 minutes ago, Asystole RN said:

Politics is everything.

Gone of the days when you could focus on a single system for your patient. When you asses a post CABG are you only assessing his cardiac status? Today we know we have to be holistic and assess the entire patient. Not only that, we have to educate and assess for their ability to sustain their care at home as well to improve total outcomes.

If you care about staffing, you need to care about those who influence your staffing. You have to understand their motivations and the reasons why they do what they do.

Just complaining about staffing doesn't do anything. If you want to change staffing go after the root cause...and the admin is not the root cause.

Im going to just say we agree to disagree. To blame it all on CMS and not administration is silly. So do hospitals get more money for having more administrator s? No, thats silly, just like saying CMS reimburses lower for having safe staffing.

I understand they have budgets like every other corporation, but the issue I and most nurses have is they reward and help themselves (I.e. hiring more administrators) but then say they dont have the money to hire additional staff. That is the issue.

Specializes in Geriatrics, Dialysis.
On 10/25/2019 at 10:44 AM, OUxPhys said:

Im going to just say we agree to disagree. To blame it all on CMS and not administration is silly. So do hospitals get more money for having more administrator s? No, thats silly, just like saying CMS reimburses lower for having safe staffing.

I understand they have budgets like every other corporation, but the issue I and most nurses have is they reward and help themselves (I.e. hiring more administrators) but then say they dont have the money to hire additional staff. That is the issue.

That's my biggest problem with where I work so this is not just a hospital problem. I work in a SNF. When we are fully staffed we have 4 nurses on the day shift. We also have a DON, ADON, 2 MDS coordinators and 3 unit managers so we actually have more management nurses than floor nurses, almost double the amount. Why is that necessary for day to day operations? I don't think it is!

Specializes in ICU.
2 hours ago, kbrn2002 said:

That's my biggest problem with where I work so this is not just a hospital problem. I work in a SNF. When we are fully staffed we have 4 nurses on the day shift. We also have a DON, ADON, 2 MDS coordinators and 3 unit managers so we actually have more management nurses than floor nurses, almost double the amount. Why is that necessary for day to day operations? I don't think it is!

This☝️ At one hospital, they promoted people to run a department of 3 people. They hired a consulting firm to come in and tell them where they were losing money. The consulting firm told them they had too much management. Rumor has it they fired the consulting firm. When I worked in non-nursing jobs, it was the same thing.