Published
What is your opinion; is alcoholism a disease or a choice? Please provide your rationale or empirical support of your belief.
BTW - The 'courts' regularly try children as young as ten in some places as adults...
Regularly? If you want to make such claims, it might be wise to back them up with some actual sources. Good luck with that, and please dont come back with an isolated incident or cases from another country. Demonstrate the "regularity" of this practice or quit making claims that you cannot substantiate.
Regularly? If you want to make such claims, it might be wise to back them up with some actual sources. Good luck with that, and please dont come back with an isolated incident or cases from another country. Demonstrate the "regularity" of this practice or quit making claims that you cannot substantiate.
stanley's allegation is certainly not a new concept.
the issue isn't IF juveniles are tried, rather, how successful it is.
Does Trying Juveniles as Adults Work?
An Analysis of the Evidence
http://www.aicharleston.com/JuvenileJustice1.htm
Juvenile Justice: Facts, Stats & History
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/juvenile/stats/
Trying Juveniles as Adults in Criminal Court: An Analysis of State Transfer Provisions
http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/172836.pdf
leslie
The 'courts' regularly try children as young as ten in some places as adults...
Two states, Kansas and Vermont, allow 10 year old children to be tried as adults.
A few years ago, The Associated Press released a study performed by Temple University which demonstrated that many children tried as adults lack the competence to even understand the proceedings.
Im sure there are a few rare murder cases where a 10 year old was charged as an adult, but that is far from "regular". Gathering enough numb-skulls in one place to pull that off can only be an anomaly.
A murdering 10 year old is only a symptom of a much larger problem, but in the absence of an understanding of what that is, i guess we should put them all in the electric chair (whether they understand why or not).:)
I have to agree with Stanley about the use of alcohol (and other drugs) used to self medicate mental illness. In my mind that does not make it less of a disease. We don't know enough about the brain and the development to be really black and white about many mental health/illness issues.
It was not that many years ago when we still blamed the mother for schizophrenia.
When a person starts to use chemicals known to fry brain cells before the brain is fully developed it certainly has the possibility of creating a state of disease. The choice to use or not is the individual's choice. That does not mean at the age of 10 (to some upper limit of maybe 17) it is an informed choice. If the brain has not completed its' growth is it competent to make decisions such as this? The law does not think so. Many recovering addicts that I know agree. Many of them started at age 10-13 to drink and then to drink more heavily until the option of not using did not exist without complete abstinance.
Congrats to all of you who have sobriety. For those of you who still are able to drink safely-go for it. Enjoy. If the situation changes and you no longer drink safely get help for your disease. You did not choose it. It chose you.
Alcoholism is a disease.
But one makes a choice as to whether to treat that disease or not.
If you are not compliant with treatment of that disease, and it gets you in trouble, this is a CHOICE.... and you have chosen poorly. And if it harms others, you should be held responsible for making that poor choice.
Much like diabetics that are not compliant, you will pay the price eventially of "poor management".
morte, LPN, LVN
7,015 Posts
i think that's what I said....but you do it so much better!