Tying Patient Satisfaction to Medicare Reimbursement is Problematic

Patient satisfaction surveys are important in helping the healthcare facility to harvest data, discover perceptions of the care being rendered, and gather suggestions on how to improve. Since patient satisfaction surveys consist of subjective data instead of objective metrics, the responses should not be tied to Medicare reimbursement rates. Nurses Safety Article

Patient satisfaction surveys have been receiving an amplified amount of attention at hospitals and other types of healthcare facilities, especially since the results of these reviews now have a significant effect on Medicare reimbursement.

Valuable information can be gleaned from the comments and feedback that patients provide when they fill out and return the surveys to the facilities where they previously received care. In addition, patient feedback is a remarkably important tool that helps the healthcare facility to harvest data, discover perceptions of the care being rendered, and gather suggestions on how to improve.

Still, patient satisfaction surveys are not exactly free from problems. In fact, patient satisfaction surveys are problematic for several reasons.

First of all, the results of these patient satisfaction surveys are entirely subjective and do not always reflect the quality of the care that clinicians are delivering. For instance, many of the most poorly rated facilities have some of the best patient outcomes, including lower than average death rates, low readmission rates, and a minimal number of hospital-acquired infections. Good facilities and skilled healthcare workers are two of the main ingredients that make favorable patient outcomes possible, but a handful of nitpicky patients can destroy one hospital's overall patient satisfaction rating by returning surveys where they've responded to every single question with 'one.' A survey score of 'one' translates to 'very poor' care, even though the patient who returned these dismal responses actually might have had an excellent outcome that was free of complications.

On the other hand, many of the most favorably rated facilities have some of the worst patient outcomes, including higher than average patient death rates. A USA TODAY analysis of more than 4,600 U.S. hospitals has found that 120 of those most highly rated by patients have higher than average death rates for heart attack, heart failure or pneumonia (USA TODAY, 2011). However, a patient's perception is his reality, so he will return a survey with appreciative responses to every single question if the care was perceived as being good, even if the inpatient stay is taking place at a hospital with a high percentage of poor outcomes.

Secondly, the corporations that formulate patient satisfaction surveys are exploiting hospital administrators' hopes of using the ratings to market their facilities. One national chain of cancer treatment hospitals regularly uses expensive airtime to broadcast television commercials. The narrator of their TV commercials never fails to mention that "our facilities have an overall 95 percent patient satisfaction rating!" Countless hospitals across the US have resorted to providing customer service measures that sometimes detract from effective patient care as an attempt to alter perceptions and raise patient satisfaction survey scores. Many overworked nurses are spending increasing amounts of time on activities such as the recital of phony scripted phrases and the constant fetching of snacks, sodas, chairs and cots to keep clients happy.

Finally, patient satisfaction surveys can unfairly generate positive ratings for mediocre doctors and bring about poor ratings for highly competent physicians. The physician who coddles the most demanding patients, submits to their unrealistic requests, gives them everything they desire and never says "no" will receive high ratings. In contrast, the doctor who sets realistic limits with patients and says "no" to improper medical care or unnecessary prescriptions will be rated unfavorably. A growing number of patients will be unhappy if they do not get what they want out of their clinicians, even if they do not need the things they are requesting.

Patient satisfaction surveys have their place in the realm of healthcare because the opinions of the people to whom we provide care are essential. However, the surveys are based on subjective perceptions instead of objective metrics such as infection rates and patient outcomes. In view of the fact that patient satisfaction surveys consist of subjective data, the responses should not be tied to Medicare reimbursement rates.

RESOURCES

USA TODAY Publishes Analysis of Death Rates at More Than 4,600 U.S. Hospitals. (August 2011). usatoday.com. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from About USA TODAY

Specializes in Pediatrics, Emergency, Trauma.

Ok...I thought that the "outcomes" were being based on nursing interventions...not pt satisfaction scores...is there something I'm missing??

Examples when I google:

http://confidenceconnected.com/connect/article/nursing_takes_the_lead_nurses_have_a_big_role_in_preventing_never_even/

http://www.nursingcenter.com/lnc/journalarticle?Article_ID=798117

^there's a link to the new CMS rule...they want to increase funding in regards to outcomes related to nursing care, and whether the care was satisfactory based on the patient not returning immediately. They have found when nursing interventions were counted, there was an increase of better outcomes...it's the CMS-1533-FC, a 2000+ page report...these rules have been established since 2006, updated in 2008, and now most are hearing about "pt outcomes" because they gave hospitals a grace period, and it's almost over.

We have a program were I work where we nurses document whether the pt should be upgraded due to pt care load/skilled hours. It helps with outcomes and how many nurses are needed to help with staffing to provide adequate care for positive nursing outcomes.

I have yet to hear about the reimbursement being tied to pt satisfaction. I have heard otherwise, been told otherwise, gave the examples from where this information can be found and use the program that documents the outcomes. If this is not the case, if anyone has this info please point me to it. :yes: Thanks.

Specializes in Pediatrics, Emergency, Trauma.

http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalHCAHPS.html

Ok...I found some information. First, this has been around since the mid 2000s. CAHs-Critical Access Hospitals, hospitals that serve the under served it is optional to report the surveys. If they are a for profit and they FAIL to report it, then it affects funding...it doesn't say that it directly affects it, it ONLY affects it if certain hospitals fail to report their surveys. Those Press-Ganey etc is not made up...these survey questions came from CMS...they were contracted by Medicare.

It was an experiment, and it has been around for close to 10 years. Even if people are upset about it, it's been around LONG before ACA...and affecting funding before then.

The places need to cough the surveys up, that's all. If hospitals want us to work harder, etc, if it's a crappy hospital, it's going to get not such a great survey, it's best to come clean... And if CMS wants them to improve, I think they are going to force them to, not the other way around...more nurses, better, food, etc. I don't think of this as a bad thing. It will expose the hospitals for not focusing on the patients but the bottom line.

Specializes in Anesthesia.

I have such a strong opinion of these patient satisfaction surveys, but so little space to provide it. What I'll say is...I have yet to find the sign in my hospital that reads "the customer is always right" or "have it your way". I don't coddle people, I don't kiss patients proverbial butts, and I don't waste my precious care-giving time on pillows, lunch boxes, or water. If you need water because you're in DKA, I'll get it for you, and quickly. If you need a warm blanket because you're hypo-thermic or the heat went out in the winter, you got it! If you're boarding in the ER because the house is full, I've got your pillow and lunch box. But if you just got placed in a treatment room, the gown is still folded on the bed, and the doctor hasn't seen you yet, that lunch box you just requested will never become a reality for you. If you want to give me poor scores for that, BY ALL MEANS DO IT WITH A BIG RED SHARPIE. But I will put you in your place when you're demanding a blanket when we're coding the pt on the other side of the curtain.

Specializes in PCCN.

I agree with the above, but unfortunately the surveys don't discriminate- the higher ups aren't going to have specifics as to WHO actually did the survey.

That's where the rest of us are getting spanked for "low scores"

It really sucksssss.

Specializes in PeriOp, ICU, PICU, NICU.

I had a nasty complaint from parents to management because I left the sliding glass door cracked open. The child was a trauma pt, vented, bolt, lines and all. The parents couldn't sleep comfortably with all the noises of course and I even caught her silencing the vent and crs monitor alarms. Unit was full so relocating the pt was not an option. It was explained to the parents that PICU tends to be a noisy environment and to bare with us. The answer was I don't care. I even suggested they take turns sleeping, possibly one going home nearby to sleep well and switch. How dare I. Lesson learned.

Management sided with her of course in the name of customer service. It will be six yrs in a few weeks as a nurse and I am ready to hang my steth. I am rearranging my life to be able to make it on a few PRN shifts a month if need be and take a FT for 1/8 pay in a non-related field.

I am too heart-broken of what nursing has become and how this is not what any of us went to school for. I am putting in my 2 weeks notice tomorrow and really mean it this time.

Specializes in PCCN.

^^^ Im sorry. This is only the tip of the iceberg.

WHO came up with this NRC Picker? Not Obama, but Dr. Picker from Harvard!!

Specializes in Med/Surg, Academics.

Along these lines, I wish that readmissions for quality measures weren't tied to reimbursement. Most hospitals have a CHF RN whose only job it is to educate on CHF. Ours is very thorough and proactive; however we see the same people all the freaking time. They aren't taking their PO lasix because they hate going to the bathroom all the time. They don't weigh themselves daily to know if they need to go to their primary, and they wait until they are SOB, then head AGAIN to the ER. All this money for a dedicated RN, home health visits, social work, just to have them noncompliant and back in the hospital getting the same meds through a different route that they should have taken PO at home.

Specializes in OR, Nursing Professional Development.
Along these lines, I wish that readmissions for quality measures weren't tied to reimbursement. Most hospitals have a CHF RN whose only job it is to educate on CHF. Ours is very thorough and proactive; however we see the same people all the freaking time. They aren't taking their PO lasix because they hate going to the bathroom all the time. They don't weigh themselves daily to know if they need to go to their primary, and they wait until they are SOB, then head AGAIN to the ER. All this money for a dedicated RN, home health visits, social work, just to have them noncompliant and back in the hospital getting the same meds through a different route that they should have taken PO at home.

Whatever happened to personal responsibility? It's not health care's fault people aren't taking their medications or waiting until a crisis occurs to seek medical attention.

Specializes in PCCN.

there is no personal responsibility. Just today I had a pt get angry with me that I wouldnt let her go out and smoke. Then her son brought her in pretzels and cheezewhiz( diabetic)

She has no desire to change anything.just get her abx and go.( might have osteo in foot/leg)

I see this mostly with 40 and 50yr olds, sometimes younger. Funny , going through their chart you usually see "hx of non compliuance". Yet they still come in , expect tx, and some food, etc while here.

These people arent paying for their bills out of pocket.,As long as they keep getting re-admitted , its all good .ugh.

I am so relieved to hear that I am not the only nurse that feels this way! After 20 years in nursing, I'm sad to say I'm thoroughly disgusted with healthcare as a whole. I started my career as a CNA, obtained LPN licensure in 99, RN in '10. After returning to the Hosp setting following an absence of 8 years , I am simply agahast at the changes that have taken place. I understand the need for pt safety, documentation and positive outcomes. However, I feel as these issues have been taken to extremes. What I could once whip out in 5 min on paper/ pen, now takes a good 20 min on the computer! I DETEST THEM! more and more emphasis on documentation to meet core values, benchmarks, and hcaps and less time with actual pt care. I dread going to work on a daily basis, my body is broken down and I'm wondering if its time to go...my question: when do you know its thine to hang it up? We work ourselves to death in the little rural ER to meet "standards" regarding times from presentation to dispo over literally "my fave is broke out"" this is insane! I feel like an overly trained/ educated data entry person. I am the only one who feels this way, or have just had a lousy day? Any suggestions for employment totally unrelated to healthcare??

Specializes in Case mgmt., rehab, (CRRN), LTC & psych.
Any suggestions for employment totally unrelated to healthcare??
One of my coworkers applied to become a TSA screener at the local international airport. It is a federal position with excellent benefits, guaranteed retirement, and best of all you get to kick unruly 'customers' the heck out.