Nurses Activism
Published Mar 20, 2003
NRSKarenRN, BSN, RN
10 Articles; 18,367 Posts
new york times, march 19, 2003
tenet healthcare corp. says it will sell, close or shrink 14 of its 114 hospitals and cut jobs and expenses to help cope with an expected decline in payments received from medicare.
...in california, where tenet has 40 hospitals, it will close only one, santa ana hospital in orange county, because the landlord wants to sell the property. but it plans to sell all four of its hospitals in arkansas and its one hospital in nevada. other hospitals to be sold are in florida, missouri, pennsylvania, tennessee and texas....
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/19/business/19care.html
phila. pa: tenet to sell or consolidate 2 local hospitals
by josh goldstein
inquirer staff writer
posted on tue, mar. 18, 2003
tenet healthcare corp. of santa barbara, calif., announced yesterday that it would sell or otherwise divest two struggling area hospitals - elkins park hospital and parkview hospital - as part of a companywide cost-cutting effort....
...implement a new consolidated nurse agency contracting program aimed at leveraging tenet's size to lower labor costs....
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/business/5424374.htm
tenn: tenet puts 14 hospitals on the market
http://www.tennessean.com/business/archives/03/03/30387225.shtml?element_id=30387225
oramar
5,758 Posts
These crooks outa be in jail also.
-jt
2,709 Posts
Implement a new consolidated nurse agency contracting program aimed at leveraging Tenet's size to lower labor costs....>Its not too hard to read between those lines. Not too long ago, whole hospital corporations in entire areas blindsided the nursing agencies by standing united in lowering the amounts they would pay RN agencies and some even formed their own in-house "agencies". Kill the competition & try to reduce the nurses employment options so she is forced to come back on staff, rather than the hospital making the workplace improvements that would attract RNs back to staff jobs. Hospitals stood united and made a deal with each other not to pay above a certain rate for outside agency. Since they locked up entire areas, if the agency wanted work at any of their facilities, it would just have to put up with being held hostage like this. Agency RN pay was cut by as much as $13/hr in some cities. The agency still got close to what it was getting - the cut was passed onto the RN and taken from her salary. The hospitals strategy was called a new "consolidated nurse agency contracting program" and all it does is lower RNs wages in an entire area - and not just for agency RN wages either. The hospitals doing this seem to be thinking that if they can make it so the RN who is working for higher wages but no benefits now with an agency suddenly cant get those higher wages either, they will come back to staff for the same low wages WITH benefits, regardless of the working conditions. The agencies will be out of business or not being used very much, and the hospitals short staffing problem will be solved the cheap way. Supposedly. But what makes the hospitals think that we only have a choice of either agency or staff in the first place? If the staff job is unacceptable and nurses cant get what they need from working agency, theyll just quit bedside altogether and go find another way to make a living.
Implement a new consolidated nurse agency contracting program aimed at leveraging Tenet's size to lower labor costs....>
Its not too hard to read between those lines. Not too long ago, whole hospital corporations in entire areas blindsided the nursing agencies by standing united in lowering the amounts they would pay RN agencies and some even formed their own in-house "agencies". Kill the competition & try to reduce the nurses employment options so she is forced to come back on staff, rather than the hospital making the workplace improvements that would attract RNs back to staff jobs.
Hospitals stood united and made a deal with each other not to pay above a certain rate for outside agency. Since they locked up entire areas, if the agency wanted work at any of their facilities, it would just have to put up with being held hostage like this. Agency RN pay was cut by as much as $13/hr in some cities. The agency still got close to what it was getting - the cut was passed onto the RN and taken from her salary.
The hospitals strategy was called a new "consolidated nurse agency contracting program" and all it does is lower RNs wages in an entire area - and not just for agency RN wages either. The hospitals doing this seem to be thinking that if they can make it so the RN who is working for higher wages but no benefits now with an agency suddenly cant get those higher wages either, they will come back to staff for the same low wages WITH benefits, regardless of the working conditions. The agencies will be out of business or not being used very much, and the hospitals short staffing problem will be solved the cheap way. Supposedly.
But what makes the hospitals think that we only have a choice of either agency or staff in the first place? If the staff job is unacceptable and nurses cant get what they need from working agency, theyll just quit bedside altogether and go find another way to make a living.
and from being caught in massive medicare insurance fraud - bilking millions of $$$ that they now have to pay back.
NICURNtobe
184 Posts
I work in one of the hospitals to be sold - No one is happy. We have fantastic benefits, are treated extremely fairly and have low turnover.
sjoe
2,099 Posts
"Hospitals stood united and made a deal with each other not to pay above a certain rate for outside agency."
This and other examples are simply criminal restraints of trade and unlawful business practices. Where are the state attorney's general? (Guess who helped them get elected?)
In some of those states, the nursing agencies were pursuing anti-trust lawsuits. Havent heard anything more about that.
pickledpepperRN
4,491 Posts
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=2670210
Tenet nurses seek union election at 7 hospitals
Thu May 1, 2003 06:45 PM ET
NEW YORK, May 1 (Reuters) - Registered nurses at seven Tenet Healthcare Corp. THC.N hospitals in the Los Angeles area will petition the federal labor board for an election for union representation,
the California Nurses Association (CNA) said on Thursday.
The National Labor Relations Board would conduct the secret ballot for 1,500 registered nurses within six weeks, said the union, which rpreseents nurses at five other Tenet hospitals and 50,000
statewide.
Tenet, the second largest U.S. hospital operator, declined to comment about the matter.
Tenet and the CNA have had a public relations battle in recent months over staffing levels and working conditions. CNA and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the largest hospital
employee union, have also been competing against one another for support of nurses.
Brotman Medical Center in Culver City, Centinela Hospital Medical Center in Inglewood, Daniel Freeman-Marina Hospital in Marina del Rey, Los Alamitos Medical Center, Mission Hospital and
Community Hospital of Huntington Park, and Suburban Medical Center in Paramount are the hospitals covered by the petitions for the elections, CNA said.
In addition to the seven hospitals CNA filed, registered nurses at more than a dozen other Tenet facilities have also been in discussions with the CNA, the union said.
http://www.calnurse.org/cna/press/5203.html
Calif. Nurses Assn. to Challenge 'Illegal' Tenet-SEIU Deal as Attempt to
Deny Employees Choice that Could Harm Patients
The California Nurses Association (CNA) today said it will challenge the "illegal, fraudulent" deal
announced today by Tenet Healthcare and the Service Employees Intl. Union (SEIU) as an attempt
to bribe Tenet employees, deny them a choice on who should represent them, and a potential harm
to patients.
On Thursday, Registered Nurses at seven Tenet hospitals in Los Angeles and Orange County
petitioned the federal labor board for a secret ballot, federally supervised representation election to
join CNA. That process, which provides RNs at those hospitals with a genuine democratic choice
and allows other unions to participate, supersedes the Tenet-SEIU pact and will proceed.
"Free elections should be a model for Tenet RNs and all Tenet employees. In the United States
employees still get to choose their union and should not have the company choose it for them," said
CNA Executive Director Rose Ann DeMoro today.
Under the Tenet and SEIU pact, Tenet employees would be handed to SEIU throughout California,
except in Orange and San Diego counties where they would be given to the American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Tenet employees will then receive pay
increases and other contract benefits - but only if they join SEIU or AFSCME.
"It's outrageous that non-union Tenet RNs and other employees, who are far behind the economic
standards of other hospital workers, especially RNs represented by CNA in 150 facilities across
California, would be compelled to join a union anointed by Tenet to qualify for pay increases,"
DeMoro said.
"Tenet should immediately provide the pay increases and any other improvements promised in this
back room deal to its deserving employees - without conditions, and without denying their
democratic rights to freely select a union of their choice," DeMoro added.
Instead, Tenet employees would be locked into a long term agreement with the main terms decided
in advance in closed door meetings with top managements of Tenet and SEIU.
Further there are no indications that Tenet RNs, in particular, will be permitted to continue to
exercise their patient advocacy obligations and be able to freely protect their patients. In the Kaiser
Permanente deal with SEIU and AFSCME, which SEIU cites as a model in its press release, those
unions agreed to silence on hospital closures or any business decisions that compromise patient
care, and SEIU co-wrote harmful programs such as bonuses for telephone advice clerks who limit
patient referrals to physicians.
Ralph Nader today joined CNA in questioning the impact of the agreement on patients.
"Tenet is notorious for its commitment to profits regardless of the consequences for the public's well
being," said Nader. "As has already occurred with other arrangements, SEIU's back room deal
degrades the independent professional responsibility of nurses for patient care protection."
CNA said today that it will file charges with the National Labor Relations Board and is considering
other legal actions against the pact. Several provisions of the deal are illegal including:
Forcing employees to join SEIU/AFSCME as a condition for receiving pay and benefit
increases.
Bribing employees with the promise of increased pay solely based on joining SEIU/AFSCME.
Selecting for employees what union they have to join, and granting exclusive favors to that
union.
For Tenet, said DeMoro, "this appears to be a short term public relations strategy designed to drive
up their stock prices with the supposed promise of 'labor peace'. Perhaps they are guided by
illusions of hefty profit taking for top executives who have seen their stock portfolios plummet in
recent months due to numerous federal and state investigations into Tenet's billing practices and
patient care conditions."
"But it will be a failed strategy," DeMoro continued. "If Tenet is doing this for investor security,
investors should feel anything but secure."
"By signing this agreement with SEIU, Tenet is presumably hoping to buy SEIU's influence with
state and national lawmakers, just as SEIU routinely lobbies for Kaiser Permanente. They hope to
silence the voice of those legislators and investigators at the very moment that billions of dollars in
claims actions are pending.
"We are confident," said DeMoro, "that the legislators will join with us in saying that patients, the
public interest, and Tenet RNs and other employees are not for sale."
CNA is the largest, independent RN organization in the U.S. representing 50,000 RNs, including
more than 1,500 Tenet RNs at five hospitals.
In its petitions Thursday, CNA is seeking to represent another 1,500 RNs at Brotman Medical Center
in Culver City, Centinela Hospital Medical Center in Inglewood, Daniel Freeman-Marina Hospital in
Marina del Rey, Los Alamitos Medical Center, Mission Hospital and Community Hospital of
Huntington Park, and Suburban Medical Center in Paramount.
More information about CNA, Tenet, and SEIU is available on the CNA website http://www.calnurse.org
Tenet, nurses' union reach agreement
Friday, May 2
Palm Beach Post Staff Report
WEST PALM BEACH - After years of bitter squabbling, Tenet Healthcare
Corp. has reached a national labor agreement with its major nurses' unions
that includes pay raises of up to 29 percent over the next four years.
About 609 registered nurses and 670 other employees at St. Mary's Medical
Center in West Palm Beach are covered by the deal. St. Mary's is the only
unionized hospital in Palm Beach County and the Treasure Coast.
The nurses' union at St. Mary's had filed an unfair labor practice charge
against the hospital a year ago, after the hospital imposed new wage and
benefits without its consent. The agreement settles that dispute, a Tenet
spokeswoman said.
The agreement covers workers represented by the Service Employees
International Union, which represents workers at St. Mary's, and the
American Federaton of Federal, State, County and Municipal Employees.
Tenet has been under constant attack from the nurses' unions which have
claimed the company's hospitals have too few nurses and require employees
to operate in difficult working conditions. Tenet struck the deal while under
investigation for overbilling Medicare; its stock has plunged 70 percent in the
past year.
If you read back a couple years ago you will find posts praising my hospital/ Now it is owened by Tenet, I work registry. These articles tell part of why:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/901999.asp?0cv=BB10&cp1=1
http://www.kpmginsiders.com/display_reuters.asp?cs_id=62668
Tenet Suit Takes Aim at Dissident Shareholder
NEW YORK, April 11 (Reuters) - Tenet Healthcare
Corp. said on Friday it was suing a dissident
shareholder, alleging he made false statements that hurt the company's share
price.
Tenet, whose Medicare billing practices are under federal investigation, filed suit
late Thursday in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles against Dr. Lee Pearce and a
dissident group called the "Tenet Shareholder Committee."
-----------------------
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/cctimes/news/local/states/california/counties/contra_costa_county/5538964.htm
Posted on Wed, Apr. 02, 2003
County severs ties with Tenet
By Peter Felsenfeld
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
Alleging unfair billing practices, Contra Costa supervisors Tuesday terminated the county's contract with
beleaguered Tenet Healthcare in a move they expect will save $1 million a year.
The national hospital chain provides services to members of the county-run health plan at Doctors Medical Center
San Pablo, formerly Brookside Hospital.
County health officials told supervisors that plan participants will still be able to use the hospital and receive the
same level of care. Tenet officials contend that fewer West County members will be seen at the facility.
Contra Costa had become victim of Tenet's widely publicized billing excesses, said county health director Dr.
William Walker. He called Tenet's rates exorbitant compared to the other six hospitals that Contra Costa contracts
with.
"We will not tolerate this type of gouging," said Supervisor Federal Glover of Pittsburg. "That's exactly what this
is."
Santa Barbara-based Tenet is the subject of federal investigations nationwide over a variety of issues, including
accusations of Medicare billing abuses, unnecessary heart procedures and illegal incentives given to doctors for
referring patients to Tenet hospitals.
Gary Sloan, CEO of Doctors Medical Center, said Contra Costa officials were taking advantage of Tenet's
problems to besmirch the hospital for financial gain.
He predicted health plan officials would send some West County patients to other areas, sometimes outside the
county, for treatment, Sloan said. "I'm concerned about where our patients, many of whom are poor and cannot
afford transportation, will get their treatment."
Not so, said health plan CEO Milt Camhi. About two-thirds of the 60,000 participants in the Contra Costa Health
Plan are on Medi-Cal, he said. The county can send those patients to the center at a rate determined by the
state's Medical Assistance Commission. That amount is lower than what Tenet has been charging, Camhi said.
The county can also send non-Medi-Cal patients to the center, but the plan will be charged the full cost for
services. Continuation of the contract would have allowed the county to receive a discounted rate for those
patients.
"So we pay a little less for the Medi-Cal and a little more for the commercial clients," Camhi said. "At the end of
the day, the county comes out ahead."
The contract negotiations stalled over a Tenet policy that forces providers to pay the full price for services above
a certain dollar amount, Walker said. The controversial provision is called "stop loss."
"Stop loss is supposed to be for catastrophic cases," Walker said. "But we see a majority of our cases meeting the
threshold. That's what happens when Tenet increases their rates so dramatically."
Sloan said the hospital offered to compromise on the provision, but the county would not listen.
"It's disturbing that the county is taking this opportunity to fix its budget problems on the backs of our hospital and
our patients," he said.
Peter Felsenfeld covers Contra Costa County. Reach him at 925-977-8506 or [email protected].
More about Tenet
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20021226-9999_1b26outliers.html