Bullying--The Other "B" Word

We used to think of unpleasant folks as boorish. Their behavior was irritating, but most of us either called them on their rudeness or let it roll off our backs. Lately people have started confusing surliness and poor manners with something far more harmful and perceiving themselves, unnecessarily, as victims. Nurses Relations Article

Updated:  

Not long ago if another nurse rolled her eyes when you gave report, cut you off while you were asking a question, or ignored you when said you needed help wasting a narcotic, she would have been called the "b" word that rhymes with "itch," (hereafter referred to as "witch" in deference to the Terms of Service.)

Today she's more likely to be called another "b" word--"bully."

Some propose that a bully is nothing more than a witch writ large, that the roles differ primarily by degree. If that were true, we might expect to see government bodies considering anti-witchiness legislation and mounting campaigns against crabby and crotchety behavior similar to the anti-bullying measures they're crafting now. Nip surliness in the bud so it never goes any further. Or so that line of thinking would suggest.

That line of thinking is wrong.

What makes bullying more than incivility on steroids?

Bullying frequently (though not always) involves an imbalance of power. An instructor over a student. A manager over an employee. A person who is physically stronger or who has greater resources over another who can't fight back without great risk or who can't fight back at all. Bullies frequently single out a vulnerable individual and communicate to bystanders that they, too, can come under fire if they choose to get involved.

Bullies have an agenda. They aren't just gruff or full of guff. They're out to get you. They make threats, implying--or telling you outright--that your grade or your job or your safety is on the line. They make it known that they have it in for you, with or without a precipitating cause. Just the fact that you showed up might be reason enough. Even if they can cite a "valid" motive, their response is out of proportion. They don't just want to tease or embarrass you. They're after pure humiliation and fear.

Bullies are often relentless. There's no negotiating with someone who wants to keep you in their cross-hairs. You can't patch things up with a person who says your presence, or even your existence, is the problem.

By contrast, people who are simply rude and obnoxious aren't trying to extort something from you or get you fired or see that you flunk out of school. They may well outrank you and treat you unfairly at times, but that's because they handle their authority poorly, not because they intend to cause you harm.

The cantankerous can snit and snort and snarl like dogs, but they don't paint a target on your back and hound you till you fear for your personal or professional safety. They might ruin your lunch break but they aren't out to take you down. The grumpy rarely have a grudge against just one person, while the bully's focus is narrowed to an individual or a small group.

Another person's witchiness can hurt. A lot. But discomfort isn't damage. And much as we might like to deny our own feet of clay, most of us will admit to having a few witchy moments (days) ourselves. I don't think we'd say the same about bullying.

Confusing rudeness with bullying creates an atmosphere in which the recipients feel far more victimized than the situation deserves. They think, "Oh, no! I'm being bullied!" rather than, "Who peed on her cornflakes?" This mindset can generate fear when irritation is more appropriate and can actually invite further bad behavior.

Loutish classmates or co-workers are just asking for others to stand up to them, refuse to be cowed by their snarkiness, and set some limits (not always wise with a bully). The whole group can benefit when the ill-tempered are called on their bad behavior. But if you convince yourself that you're dealing with a bully when you're not, you'll probably back away and start feeling oppressed.

Some of this misunderstanding can be traced to a lack of security and confidence in people who are more used to dealing with praise than with correction. Grouchy responses can feel like outright hostility if you are accustomed to a high level of affirmation and reassurance. Even simple, non-malicious disagreement can be perceived as bullying when the delivery is blunt.

Wouldn't we all be better off if everyone was kinder and gentler?

We might, but with political correctness already running amok, imagine the morass of legislation and litigation it would take to enforce a "niceness" mandate.

Genuine bullying is, unfortunately, a horrible reality in this world, and its solutions are fodder for many more articles. But, surely, the first step is to strip away distraction, oversimplification, and inaccurate claims. Referring to merely disagreeable behavior as bullying muddies the waters when the real thing comes along. If superiors get handed enough unwarranted complaints, if students and staff members have cried "Bully!" when what they really meant was, "She's such a witch!"--the powers that be may not investigate fully or take true aggression seriously.

Adults need to learn the difference between someone who makes them feel bad and someone who poses a real threat to their well being.

Witchiness and bullying aren't the same thing. And the distinction is worth preserving.

READ

How To Spot a Workplace Bully, Part One

How To Spot a Workplace Bully, Part Two

Absolutely on target! Fantastic article and well put.

As it was once said,"Nobody can make you feel inferior without your permission." The fact is we have to own our choices on how we feel. Victimization has never helped anyone. Even a true Victim gets counseling to learn to cope and move past the pain and hurt.

Specializes in IMCU.

Nicely done.

I would like to see people at work learn to look after their own needs better. When someone is extremely witchy I tend to ask them about it (usually later and in private). It is not OK to be obnoxious to me at work or anywhere where else. What i do not do, is make it personal. I simply state "xxxxxx is really not OK with me". I don't make them wrong by using incendiary language (calling them rude) nor do I globalize the problem (e.g.tell them other people on the unit think a,b or c about them). This helps prevent the situation from escalating. If they react badly, and some do, I can go home knowing I have looked after myself. The next time I see that person I greet them properly and look them in the eye (i.e. I don't hold a grudge). Hopefully this sends a message that it was their behavior and not them that was the issue.

In the general course of my day people can be tense and terse, as can I. When I take this personally I am the person with the problem. This direct approach is hard -- because it is direct.

Oh yes, and when I am a jerk and someone points it out, I am grateful because I know it took courage to approach me. I don't want to be the team witch.

BTW don't think I am having private words with everyone who is rude (or whatever).

I don't think that holding people to a higher standard of civility is necessarily a bad thing. Instead of telling the sensitive people to "get a thicker skin", I'd tell the rude people that they need to work on their character.

duckyluck111 said:
I don't think that holding people to a higher standard of civility is necessarily a bad thing. Instead of telling the sensitive people to "get a thicker skin", I'd tell the rude people that they need to work on their character.

I wasn't telling sensitive people to get a thicker skin. I wanted to help them distinguish between rudeness and something more threatening. People who automatically see bullying in witchy behavior are far less likely to "tell rude people that they need to work on their character," which, I agree, can be just what the nurse practitioner ordered.

Quote
Loutish classmates or co-workers are just asking for others to stand up to them, refuse to be cowed by their snarkiness, and set some limits (not always wise with a bully). LThe whole group can benefit when the ill-tempered are called on their bad behavior. But if you convince yourself that you're dealing with a bully when you're not, you'll probably back away and start feeling oppressed.

Thanks for the input.

Specializes in CVICU, Obs/Gyn, Derm, NICU.

Great post - thankyou.

Just a point though - I feel witch can easily blur into bully in some situations. In these situations nurses bully with cattiness - their practice of exclusion and minimisation, for example - is how they do it. Nothing more complex or worldly is required - not much more evolved than high school bully girl behaviour.

A sense of powerlessness results when the workplace culture doesn't allow confrontation ( the NM handles the issues - resulting in most people limiting their visits into the NM's office to report an infraction), when huge evidence is required from the bullied to substantiate a case and when the whistleblower becomes victimised.

This is great culture for the nurse bully and being very witchy is how these individuals bully in nursing

This sense of powerlessness is perhaps more pronounced in those who have invested more into their education. Those newbies with a prior degree plus their nursing degree seem to feel this 'powerlessness' very acutely - 'I went to university for how many years and now I have to put up with this high school garbage'. Our second career newbies; particularly those who have had professional corporate roles, take a good hard look at the bully girls and tend to make a swift exit. This exit is often right out of nursing.

The culture of powerlessness enables these witches to become bullies when people lose part of themselves (confidence? selfesteem?) or; as is common - their jobs when they walk away, or their careers when their chain of progression is broken.

So they do achieve their purpose here simply by some very catty behaviour - competition leaves. Those they target? New nurses with intelligence, sensitivity, potential to develop strong clinical skills and who happen to have obvious professional skill (the whole package).

Note they rarely are catty to everyone. They leave most of the others alone - bar some rude behaviour.

They do have a goal - but it handily becomes muddied in this scenario.

What i am trying to say here ..... the nurse bully MO is often a calculated cattiness.

It's effective... they learnt it in high school and it still works in many nursing environments

DolceVita said:
Nicely done.

I would like to see people at work learn to look after their own needs better. When someone is extremely witchy I tend to ask them about it (usually later and in private). It is not OK to be obnoxious to me at work or anywhere where else. What i do not do, is make it personal. I simply state "xxxxxx is really not OK with me". I don't make them wrong by using incendiary language (calling them rude) nor do I globalize the problem (e.g.tell them other people on the unit think a,b or c about them). This helps prevent the situation from escalating. If they react badly, and some do, I can go home knowing I have looked after myself. The next time I see that person I greet them properly and look them in the eye (i.e. I don't hold a grudge). Hopefully this sends a message that it was their behavior and not them that was the issue.

In the general course of my day people can be tense and terse, as can I. When I take this personally I am the person with the problem. This direct approach is hard -- because it is direct.

Oh yes, and when I am a jerk and someone points it out, I am grateful because I know it took courage to approach me. I don't want to be the team witch.

BTW don't think I am having private words with everyone who is rude (or whatever).

The bolded part above is an excellent example of assertive behavior. You stand your ground, focus on the behavior, set some limits, and walk away knowing that you took care of yourself without attacking the other person. And then you let it go.

Bravo!

Quote
Sorry but I have to disagree with you. The definition of a bully is NOT that a person must be actively out to cause significant harm to you, i.e. losing your job.

I don't think we disagree at all.

The examples in your quote (post #10) are not just witchy behavior, and they would cause significant harm to a person's sanity and sense of well-being. Bullies do have agendas, even if they're nothing more than torturing the victim.

The point of the article was to help people distinguish between the calculated, relentless targeting of a bully and the snitting and sniping of a rude person. Not every crabby co-worker is a bully. But if every ill-mannered act is perceived as bullying, people may be too freaked out to practice the assertiveness and limit-setting that can let a witchy person know they need to back off.

rn/writer said:
Thanks, guys, for the input

I wrote this because I have seen so many "bully" complaints that were really reactions to someone's rudeness. We're all so Kumbyah and Kool-Aid these days that people have either forgotten, or were never taught in the first place, how to take care of themselves and their tender feelings, so a brusque exchange now rubs against them like sandpaper.

As soon as the new "B" word enters the picture, you have folks who freak. Most of the time a few lessons in snappy comebacks or zen calmness would take care of things. But without that, and without the ability to distinguish between a witchy co-worker and a bully, things can get ugly fast.

Let me just add that this article is directed toward adults. Kids have a whole different dynamic that I don't even want to approach. But grown-ups need to learn how to take care of themselves in the school and work worlds without feeling persecuted when some curmudgeon gives them a hard time.

How is bullying different in kids, can a peer be a bully? is the definition different? are the kids who are "bullied" now the adults who will be "bullied" as adults ?

Document, document, document. I have a whole notebook of information on specific episodes which holds incriminating evidence of hostile nurses and managers, including sexual harassment. I also included names of witnesses to the bullying. Your memory may fade or the bullying episodes become foggy or blend together, or are indeterminable... and if u need to recall events for disciplinary reasons, it will be helpful to review your notes.

anotherone said:
How is bullying different in kids, can a peer be a bully? is the definition different? are the kids who are "bullied" now the adults who will be "bullied" as adults ?

Being bullied as a child may well predispose a person to being bullied as an adult. But it can also have the reverse effect of causing that child to decide that no one is ever going to push her around again and becoming a bully herself. Many bullies were traumatized by someone earlier in life and they chose the path of mounting an offensive defense.

With kids, the wrongness of bullying is exactly the same. The targeting, the relentlessness, the gut-wrenching reaction of the victim and the bully's intimidation of peers, etc. also parallel adult experience. But because of the variations in their developmental stages and processing abilities and the tendency of teachers and other leaders to dismiss complaints as normal playground squabbling, bullying in kids is harder to identify and stop.

I am so glad that schools are finally taking this seriously and teachers are being taught how to spot the subtle signs of bullying. Many schools are bringing the topic out in the open and putting practices in place that make bullying socially unacceptable and harder to pull off.

But I don't want to get into the topic of kid bullying any further because it's so complex and requires specialized instruction to deal with effectively.

Thanks for your questions.

Specializes in Geriatrics, Home Health.

I don't know. it sound like you're saying "witchiness" is okay. In my experience, people who pride themselves on being blunt and to-the-point take extreme offense when other people do the same to them.

Specializes in neuro/ortho med surge 4.
duckyluck111 said:
I don't think that holding people to a higher standard of civility is necessarily a bad thing. Instead of telling the sensitive people to "get a thicker skin", I'd tell the rude people that they need to work on their character.

A million times yes!!!!!! I have heard this saying many times- People treat you how you let them. This puts the blame on the person who is not the aggressor. This saying implies it is OK to treat another poorly because they may be timid or quiet. What kind of ***-backward thinking is that?