Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

allnurses

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Discussion

What is the common practice for oxygen use for diaper rash?

When a neonate has a bad diaper rash, we try to leave the buttocks open to air as much as possible, as well as using blow-by oxygen directly to the diaper area. Some nurses use 21%, while others use 100% oxygen. What is the common practice on your unit? Has anyone seen any research done on this topic?

Featured Replies

We use blow-by on diaper rashes but I never change the O2 level, I don't think it matters if you use 21% or 100%!

Oxygen for diaper rash. Really? Never heard of that one

We do that also, it is 100% as that is what our bags are, but it does help dry the area out! Makes sense, the only thing we are lacking is a mini hyperbaric chamber lol

We don't do it because I didn't think there was any evidence supporting the practice. We just leave their open bums in the air. Anyone have a reference or resource supporting this?

I've never heard of this one, but I started a diaper rash thread a few weeks ago. We use hair blow dryers on low heat to dry the diaper area.

It's pretty much just the airflow dries it out. Kind of just common sense I guess lol

Never heard of this but it does make sense. We try to air dry, use a soft cloth with just water instead of the wipes, and get an order for diaper rash cream when it is severe. My only concern about this would be the cost of the tubing. Our boss is very focused on the budget.

Old practice used to be to use O2 flow on skin to aide in drying site, with the theory to have oxygen act as a healing agent in terms of vasoconstriction. The problem with high level O2 (100%) is that it can potentially effect the eyes worsening or inducing retinopathy of prematurity. Oxygen is a great medication, but the more we learn about the effects we become more cautious on how liberal we are using it. I personally have found great luck in using prescribed ointment, however the key is to apply a layer of vaseline to the actual diaper so it is unable to wipe off all that precious ointment.

Would this work on an adult coccyx wound? Like when the skin is just starting to break down? I've used this method in NICU and Peds but have never thought to try it on an adult?

It could be blow by air for the same effect... that must feel great!

Agree with post above about oxygen and it's detrimental effect. Pumping 100% FiO2 into a preemie's closed incubator can contribute to ROP (think Stevie Wonder). Also oxygen is a drug and I would think it is out of an RN's scope of practice to administer it for this purpose without an order. Just because it has always been done does not mean it is good practice. I would also be interested to see the evidence.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a Comment

Currently Reading 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.