There is a new war raging and it is not Covid. Although the pandemic precipitated our current crisis, the battlefront has now reached our nursing staff.
Updated:
Our lifeblood has been drained and nursing shortages have reached critical levels. We must act now to fight for our survival as nurses before it's too late. We need to come up with swift and creative alternatives to our present broken healthcare system. Read on to find out my solution to combat and win back our precious careers and livelihoods.
For the first time in almost 2 years, I am starting to feel hopeful about the Covid Pandemic. Although we have not beaten the virus and hospitals are overflowing with Covid patients, we are finally getting the tools and treatments necessary to control it.
On Dec. 9, 2021, the news outlets, including CNet informed readers that "The drug, called Evusheld (AstraZeneca) is given via two injections to eligible people age 12 and up who aren't sick with COVID-19 and who haven't been recently exposed to the virus. According to the FDA, it may be effective for six months".
I followed each of these treatments and tests way before they were approved and am cheering when they have become available to the public. Every development helps to turn the tide on the pandemic. I am happy to see the weakening virus trend (so far). With the above points and the Omicron variant resembling a common cold (for those who have been fully vaccinated), I am heartened that the burden on our nurses may start to ease up soon.
However, it is a little too late for our healthcare system as another crisis is upon us. This is one emergency that most staff in the medical world and I saw coming.
This current calamity is our nursing and provider shortage. Our medical (mainly hospital and nursing home) staffing is in critical shape and will likely worsen in the next year. We require "fresh troops,” and we need them fast. The usual remedy of throwing more money at nurses is not working. Although generous pay is beneficial, what we really need is more time off, lower nurse-to-patient ratios, and less overcrowding in our hospitals. In essence, nurses are being worked to death. Currently, nurses leave the profession altogether or trade jobs to non-clinical environments to lower their stress levels.
Hospitals are left without adequate nursing staff. I, for one, would not want to be a patient in a hospital at present. For the most part, it is an unsafe environment. Even though nurses are doing the best they can, most are already burnt-out and exhausted from overwork. The ER, in particular, reminds me of the state of medical care in an underdeveloped country. Long waits in the ER are now up to days to get seen or admitted to a hospital. Patients who are too sick to sit up in chairs in the waiting area, lie on the floors. Covid patients mix with the most medically fragile in close quarters for too long.
Only 2 years ago, we could care for the sick in our community in an organized and efficient manner, and now our medical system has been reduced to inhumane conditions. In essence, the pandemic has dragged on too long and the already fragile camel's back has broken beyond repair.
Our hospital systems are aware that our healthcare staffing is a wreck. Many "acknowledge that there is a problem" but are grappling with solutions. So far, I have not seen a whole lot of viable remedies being introduced. Is our government working on helping out in this nursing shortage war? Truthfully, there appears to be a lack of ideas about how to help our hospitals and nurses get back on their feet.
Just talking about and telling us there is a problem won't help. We have to fight back right now and fast in this battle for our nurses.
There is no time for ponderance when the attack is ongoing and currently waging. We need ACTION now!
This whole healthcare crisis started to make me think about the nurses' training from past generations.
Many of you may not remember the days of "practical nurse training". Much of this LPN and RN education was "on the job". Due to this "immersion" experience, we could churn out practical nurses quickly.
As a BSN student, I remember boarding temporarily at one such "teaching" hospital for my critical care rotation. The practical nurse's school had closed long ago, but the "housing" was still in place. The student nurse accommodations was located on the entire hospital's top floor (attic). This large, mainly abandoned area that now only housed outdated supplies and furniture was one scary place for 3 young nursing students to reside all by themselves. The dorm hall was the length of a football field with endless doors and dark corridors atop the hospital. We BSN candidates huddled together in one room for comfort to sleep each night, hoping to ward off what surely could be many ghosts of the dead in this 200-year-old facility.
Aside from the creepy accommodations, I am sure that there were many, many nursing students who graduated from this practical nurses program of old and became excellent nurses.
As I think back, I am wondering if we currently could revisit this practical nurse education model temporarily to help ease our nursing shortage quickly.
I know that nursing has come a long way from those "old" days and the ideal for higher educated BSN nurses has taken over. But once again, we are in crisis, so we may need to think outside of the lines for now.
I began to ponder about WWI and WWII medical staffing. How did we ramp up our nursing "troops" quickly? A little research showed that we could meet the nursing needs of our army well. How did they rapidly accomplish this daunting task?
I found that the US government hired student nurses to start "nursing" almost right off the bat. After a brief orientation, nurse "cadets" began pitching in as nurses, obtaining nursing skills on the job. This is a similar model to our practical nursing programs, albeit possibly in a more condensed time frame.
This blog that I found on the WWII army cadet nursing program is very interesting. Read here if you want to learn more about the process of nursing education for our war nurses.
I decided to put into words what I was thinking as a possible solution to our war on nursing.
1. The current US administration should pay for "rapid" nursing education programs to get nurses quickly into the field. Their wages should start right from the onset of their education. I'm sure many men and women would love to become nurses but can not afford to give up their current jobs and go without pay as they receive their nursing education.
We have many loan "payback" programs currently but this option would be in effect at the institution of the nursing program.
2. Free child-care for nursing students.
3. Institute ideas and incentives to employ additional nurse educators for these rapid grad nursing programs.
4. Continue paying for nursing education once our ranks are replenished to eventually obtain a BSN degree for those who desire to do so.
5. Encourage our current MAs and CNAs to fast-track into one of these programs
6. Hire more "assistants" for the nurses. This article from MSNBC nicely illustrates how "helpers" for nurses free up RNs to perform adequate assessment and care for their patients.
We will need government buy-in, of course, for the free training. But we nurses, as one inventive and determined entity, can rise up to meet our current battle with a crusade of our own. If we just complain, quit and wait for others to find a solution, we, along with our sick loved ones will be the casualties.
I have seen how quickly telemedicine has developed in the past year. I hope that solutions for the nursing shortage will fall into place just as quickly. If we can come together as a group to tackle our current war on staffing inadequacy, I am confident that we can overcome this crisis on our own terms.
So, nurse educators, nurses with political influence, administrators, nurses on the front lines and those in the background supporting our troops, let's put our heads together and beat our common enemy.
I know that we will have to get past what we are accustomed to regarding our current comprehensive BSN model nursing education. The outcome of my proposition will hopefully produce a similar result eventually. However, the training process is a new (yet old) concept. I hope this idea could entice interested potential nurses to enroll and train quickly to fill the immediate gaps before more of our current "soldiers" fall.
If this concept is feasible, how can we run this idea "up the pole,” so to speak and get a groundswell going? I would love for our current government administration to quickly get on board if this proposal is attainable. As nurses and nurse educators, we have the best insight into this idea. Can it work?
I would love to hear other nurses' opinions on this and their ideas.
15 hours ago, Orca said:I also fear that such an approach might be utilized by the profit mongers to justify even lower salaries. Instead of a way to augment more experienced and better trained nurses, they might instead be viewed as replacements to lower costs.
This was going on before. I've seen experienced nurses walked out over nothing (cutbacks was the most hilarious reason) and replaced by someone at half the cost. When Press Ganeys would come out, admin couldn't understand lower scores. Not because the newer nurse was bad, per se, but because the experienced nurse knew how to handle the horror so much better
There are so many nurses forced out of nursing for minor infractions in their personal life. Even after months and months of action to fix my particular issue, I am forced to work in a restaurant until the board allows me to practice again. I’m a trauma nurse slinging burgers. How about the boards of nursing re-evaluate harsh punishments and let the qualified work?
On 1/7/2022 at 8:47 PM, SmilingBluEyes said:Here's what may help: RETENTION efforts.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but hospital leadership doesn't really want to retain experienced, frontline nurses. They have a kind of "wish list" much like you'd see in an online dating profile and they are absolutely convinced that anything over 5 or so years experience represents overkill for a position at the bedside. (That ideal experience number can go up somewhat for critical care nurses since their initial training cost is so ridiculously high.)
Now this pandemic situation obviously is unique, but in more normal times hospital leadership would be happy as proverbial clams to have 5 years experience or less at the bedside, just so long as they have an adequate supply of replacement fodder in the pipeline.
They certainly don't want people with responsibilities at home which might interfere with the ability to work at least 12+hours shifts, or in some manner interfere with your availability to pick up additional shifts on your scheduled days off as needed. Keep them too long and they might start having more illnesses or injuries, can't have that. They might even start realizing that they may want to retire someday.
5 minutes ago, glasgow3 said:I hate to be the bearer of bad news but hospital leadership doesn't really want to retain experienced, frontline nurses. They have a kind of "wish list" much like you'd see in an online dating profile and they are absolutely convinced that anything over 5 or so years experience represents overkill for a position at the bedside
but in more normal times hospital leadership would be happy as proverbial clams to have 5 years experience or less at the bedside
Actually, they want 5+ years experience at new nurse pay, that will blissfully put up with the nonsense rules
On 1/12/2022 at 2:41 PM, cgw5364 said:I have 30 years nursing experience. I worked with some wonderful LPN's in my career including one that showed me how to be a nurse as a new grad. I have also experienced being the only RN on a floor with LPN's. I was not only responsible for my patient's I was responsible for the LPN's patient's IV meds and assessments and being in charge. This was on a mother baby unit and we had a lot of fresh C/S that required PCA's and IV pushes. The LPN's I worked with were in ADN school and they were wonderful to work with. It was just a lot for me to be responsible for. I am sure there are some older nurses that can relate with this situation.
*****************************************************************
QuoteI relate. I learned so much from those LPNs I worked with, but I was responsible for all IVP meds and PCAs as well had to cosign all assessments. It was a lot. This was also mother-baby. The other 4 hospitals I worked at did not employ LPNs in L/D or Nursery. I missed those helpful and experienced LPNs but did not miss the paperwork and running around doing all the IVP meds. Still I think hospitals that refuse to employ LPNs are making a mistake. They are some of the most knowledgeable and helpful nurses I ever had the pleasure to work with.
Above below asterisks is my text. I don't know how I wound up "quoting" this above poster with my words.
4 hours ago, DannyBoy8 said:More resiliency training please.
Emotional resiliency is not something you easily train for in adulthood when patterns of how we react to our environment, people and situations becomes ingrained in child hood . Emotionally resilient children become emotionally resilient adults. While it is nice to assume that everyone should be nice and fair, and politicians should be honest and you'll never be bullied one has to realize that this is a completely unrealistic expectation.
Hppy
Orca, ADN, ASN, RN
2,066 Posts
I also fear that such an approach might be utilized by the profit mongers to justify even lower salaries. Instead of a way to augment more experienced and better trained nurses, they might instead be viewed as replacements to lower costs.