Published
I agree that it is a good article and can be useful information to have when trying to understand people. However, it is also important to remember that not everyone fit's into their generation as cleanly as the article defines them. I have seen a "traditionalist" with poor work ethic and a "millennial" who cannot figure out a smart phone to save her life. You can put people at a real disadvantage if you label them with the traits of their "generation" without getting to know them as an individual.
I agree that it is a good article and can be useful information to have when trying to understand people. However it is also important to remember that not everyone fit's into their generation as cleanly as the article defines them. I have seen a "traditionalist" with poor work ethic and a "millennial" who cannot figure out a smart phone to save her life. You can put people at a real disadvantage if you label them with the traits of their "generation" without getting to know them as an individual.[/quote']I think there is a consensus that I have said in many posts that overlap certain birth years and generations; as well as there are many people raised by certain generations that mimic the generations they were raised from; I'm sure we are well aware that people are individuals; however, in the context of the positives of each generation when working on a committee; there are people generation-wise that approach things very differently; this article-as a results of many studies-have given the rationale to the WHY for guidance purposes only.
My staff ranges from 19 to 79. Since we're Central Intake for home care referrals, standardized processes are extremely important. They all communicate differently and want to receive work updates in different ways.
Example: Having a disaster call tree no longer works as younger staff only have cell phones and calls go straight to voicemail--so no way I can leave a message to call 2 other staff re delayed work start time...have to move to generating text message to everyone....except for our over 65 staff who don't have a text plan as part of their cell phone package.
I love Medscape too! Overall I don't think the categories are bad intrinsically; it is just how nurse managers use them. What I take away from the article is how certain events - specifically in medicine and health - can affect generations in a given work environment (in this case, nursing). To me, that's pretty interesting. I think we are in some part a product of our environment but not entirely. For example I am a millenial and I dislike social networking but if I needed to I can find out how to put up a FB page, get a blog going, and know how to connect with people pretty quickly. I think there are underlying qualities of each generation that tend to be more specific but end up being generalized in the article. These types of categorizations help from a larger perspective; but to really understand the motivations of any individual nurse means you have to sit down and talk with them.
Might I add that nursing is an awesome career because you have so many generations working with one another.
NRSKarenRN, BSN, RN
10 Articles; 19,190 Posts
The 4-Generation Gap in Nursing
Medscape Nurses
Laura A. Stokowski, RN, MS
April 2013
Free Medscape registration required