Published
Coming to it from an ED perspective...all of our assessments are focused--not necessarily every square inch of the body. I cannot see any reason to charts the specifics of a tattoo (in the PMH section of our charting, there is a check box for "tattoos/piercings"--mostly for MRI purposes I believe). I don't see any reason to chart "red rose on right hip and 'mother' inside a heart on left deltoid."
Scars I will chart if pertinent to the pt's CC. For instance, if he/she comes in with knee pain and they have a knee surgery scar I would chart something brief on it, like "healed surgical scar on right knee."
I see other nurses do this, too, and I don't. I will chart that all skin in intact except xyz wounds or rashes that are present (if any). I do make notes on "multiple healed scars present on abdomen" or "mongolian spot present on sacral area," for example. The mongolian spot is especially important as an oncoming nurse who has never seen it might think it's a bruise. The multiple healed scars may be important to indicate that the patient has a complex medical history and the skin in that area is not as flexible and perhaps more prone to breakdown. But it's not entirely necessary to chart on healed scars.
I also get bothered when someone charts on a wound that is covered by a bandage. You can't see the wound under the bandage, so you can't tell if it's well approximated or whatever. All you can chart is "unable to visualize wound, covered by dressing. Small amount of dried drainage present on dressing."
As a wound care nurse, I never chart anything about tattoos. I suppose I would if the person developed cellulitis as a consequence of a tattoo but it's not ordinarily the focus of the skin assessment. I have charted on scars because as was mentioned previously, we often see them r/t surgeries. You will also see scars from healed pressure ulcers. As Anon said it is important to document healed scars and discolorations of the tissue. I will say however unless you've been directed to not remove a dressing you should always do so w/ your assessment. I have had many MANY nurses tell me they didn't look at the wound because there was a dressing in place. I've heard this too w/ the foam dressings used on the sacrum. How else are you going to know what is going on with the wound if you can't see it?
annie.rn
546 Posts
We chart in Meditech at the hospital where I work. For each body system in the physical assessment you place a "Y" (for "yes") or an "N" ( for "no") next to the question that says "WDP?" ("Within Defined Parameters").
My confusion is this: I find people will chart "no" under "integumentary WDP?" and "no" under "skin intact?" if a patient has a tattoo or scar. They will then document each scar and each tattoo in the area where one would document incisions, rashes, wounds, etc.
I can see charting "no" under the more general "integumentary WDP?" because having a scar or tattoo is not something a body is born with and therefore makes a person's skin technically not WDP.
However, charting "N" under "skin intact?" for a tattoo/scar doesn't make sense to me because their skin is not broken down.
So, do you chart tattoos/old scars?
If so, based on what I've described, where would you chart it?
I've asked a few people at work but, as with most things, you get a different answer depending who you ask.
Thanks!