Are We Letting Our Patients Suffer?

The title says it all - has the pendulum swung the opposite way? Are we providing adequate pain relief for our patients or holding back for fear of addiction? Nurses Announcements Archive

Published

Recently I had a patient who fractured her femur, mid-shaft. She was unable to have it repaired due to multiple co-morbids. So, she was given a brace and told it would have to heal in time. She developed some wounds from the brace and it had to be removed. She goes to the wound clinic once per week, dialysis three times per week and each time she is transferred by a Hoyer lift into her wheelchair, transferred to the nursing home van and then, at least at dialysis is then transferred again via Hoyer to the dialysis chair. XRays done recently showed nonunion of this fracture which can be attributed to several factors: malnutrition, hyperphosphatemia, osteoporosis.

For pain, she has been Rx'd with: fentanyl 62.5mcg patch changed every 72 hours, percocet 10/325 one orally every 8 hours as needed and tylenol 650mg every 8 hours as needed. Prior to her femur fracture, she had been on a fentanyl 50mcg patch changed every 72 hours as well as Percocet 5/325 every 8 hours as needed due to severe osteoarthritis - made worse by end stage renal disease.

She comes to the dialysis unit crying in pain due to the 10 mile ride from the nursing home to the dialysis unit. There is no medication to give her at the dialysis unit except tylenol. Her pain is not controlled well - she continually rates her pain 8-10/10. She is physically addicted to opioids due to several years of chronic pain meds for her multiple disease processes. When I spoke to the nursing home staff, I was told "we can't continue to contribute to her addiction."

Another incident - a friend (fellow APRN) underwent major abdominal surgery recently. She was opioid naive and prior to her surgery, took no medication. She was healthy and had NKDA. Post-operatively she was given Norco 5/325 one every 8 hours as needed as well as ibuprofen 600mg every 8 hours. However, she rated her pain in the first 24 hours consistently 8/10. One nurse made the comment that she (the nurse) was sorry but the doctor "didn't want her to become addicted."

Two recent incidents, different patients, different reasons for pain yet both were denied adequate pain relief.

Have we gone too far in the opposite direction?

Are we letting our patients suffer in the name of patient safety?

"The National Institutes of Health (NIH) estimate that in the United States, 25.3 million adults have chronic pain." What are we supposed to do? As providers we want to provide adequate pain control for both our chronic pain patients as well as for those with acute pain. "A team of researchers at Wake Forest University and the University of Bath in the U.K. is exploring a new kind of opioid that could relieve pain without affecting breathing or raising the chance for abuse. The new drug, only called by its chemical compound name BU08028, relieved pain in rhesus macaque monkeys. When they had the opportunity to take as much of the drug as they wanted, they didn't abuse it. When taken off the drug, they didn't show signs of painful withdrawal." Perhaps this will be a new medication for both chronic and acute pain.

Some other suggestions:

  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication such as ibuprofen - can be used either alone or as an adjunct
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy has been used successfully for acute worker's compensation injuries
  • Ketamine is now being used for acute pain. Recently the journal AACN Advanced Critical Care included a Drug Update about the use of ketamine in the ICU.

So, what to do? Are we helping to prevent opioid addiction or are we letting our patients suffer needlessly? What are your thoughts?

Yes, we are making some pts suffer. My state limits narcotics to a 7-day supply ONLY, regardless of the qty on the actual script. I'm in ENT, so we're talking some very painful surgeries (tonsillectomy, UPPP, sinus/septoplasty/turbinate reduction; head and neck cancers) and our adults who are 7-days postop tonsilletomy can't get any more norco when they're in the worst pain of their life. It's horrible.

Specializes in Critical Care; Cardiac; Professional Development.
I understand your conflicted thoughts. If we look at addiction as a disease process that can be treated, does that help to differentiate between opioid use and opioid abuse?

I definitely believe that addiction is a disease process. Where I get hung up is that, like any disease process, we can only treat a person who wants treatment and that denial of there actually BEING a disease is common, both in the patient and often in their families as well. I have a great deal of ethical stress about it. I want to treat pain. I have had pain myself. I have had undertreated pain. It was horrific. But I don't want to be a supplier to someone who is addicted or so tolerant that they no longer work but are resistant to trying to do other things. The madness has to stop somewhere but having it stop on the backs of people in genuine need is madness as well.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
Yes, we are making some pts suffer. My state limits narcotics to a 7-day supply ONLY, regardless of the qty on the actual script. I'm in ENT, so we're talking some very painful surgeries (tonsillectomy, UPPP, sinus/septoplasty/turbinate reduction; head and neck cancers) and our adults who are 7-days postop tonsilletomy can't get any more norco when they're in the worst pain of their life. It's horrible.

Why can they not get more? Are you saying that in your state patients can not get another script after the initial 7 days?

Our surgery teams here are disgruntled by the change because they get more phone calls for script refills and/or need to see patients in clinic 7-days post-op to refill their initial script, but they are not prevented from giving additional medication.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
The madness has to stop somewhere. Having it stop on the backs of people in genuine need is madness.

I think we are placing too much emphasis on curtailing existing opioid prescriptions when the solution to the problem is to restrain new opioid prescriptions. The way I see it there are four types of patients:

1. Stable/appropriate chronic users: My approach is that there is little to be done to this population, they are not the problem. The only things we can/should do is inform patients about risks and screen for them, make attempts to taper to a lowest tolerated dose, and prevent drug interactions that increase risk.

2. Unstable/inappropriate chronic users: My approach here is that these users need to be transitioned to either appropriate users or be safely discontinued. If they are showing negative for prescribed drugs or they fit a clear pattern of abuse then I abruptly (in the case of the former) or rapidly discontinue them. If they are over the MME then I slowly work with the patient to transition them to a stable chronic user.

3. Appropriate acute users: My approach here is similar to the first case: screen for risks and discuss then treat their acute pain appropriately with the lowest tolerated dose for shortest time. There is nothing wrong with these scripts, and I don't see any reason to need more than 7 days at a time.

4. Inappropriate acute users: These patients need non-opioid options or extremely close monitoring or specialist referral. They are not safe candidates for opioids.

**Caveat: I am talking only about prescription drug use/abuse.

I definitely believe that addiction is a disease process. Where I get hung up is that, like any disease process, we can only treat a person who wants treatment and that denial of there actually BEING a disease is common, both in the patient and often in their families as well. I have a great deal of ethical stress about it. I want to treat pain. I have had pain myself. I have had undertreated pain. It was horrific. But I don't want to be a supplier to someone who is addicted or so tolerant that they no longer work but are resistant to trying to do other things. The madness has to stop somewhere. Having it stop on the backs of people in genuine need is madness.

The denial is part of the disease, and family members are affected also. People who are addicted to opiods (or other drugs/alcohol), for whatever reason, whether they are rich or poor, employed, unemployed, or homeless, all deserve to receive medical care in order to help manage the effects of these strong medications. People cannot manage chronic/acute pain and/or opiate withdrawal/opiate dependence by themselves safely without medical supervision. It really is a matter of patient safety and treating people humanely.

I think we have to realize that we don't know the details of peoples lives, or the reasons that led to a person's addiction, and do our best to withhold our judgement about the few details we do know about the person, i.e. they aren't employed and don't seem to want to do anything to fix their problem, if we want to be of help. Much more could be done at a primary care level to help these patients, and this would decrease their need to use the ED for this purpose.

Yep, welcome to the 'war on drugs' part two. Part one we tossed inner city folks in jail forever while well-heeled white folks snorted cocaine off the tables at discotheques. Now that lil white Susie and Bobby OD we need to have a new law for each one and blame meds for which they never had a legit Rx.

And what happened to meth? It is still out there in abundance but the government isn't going to declare a crisis with a drug people can whip up at home when doctors make such nice targets; don't shoot back and have assets to seize. I saw this coming the moment the DEA decided Norco should be a schedule two; only thing this did was cause docs to fear treating pain at all. I hope this unfortunate patient is not anuric lest her RX is Dc'd for inability to pee in a cup.

Specializes in Nephrology, Cardiology, ER, ICU.
Yes, we are making some pts suffer. My state limits narcotics to a 7-day supply ONLY, regardless of the qty on the actual script. I'm in ENT, so we're talking some very painful surgeries (tonsillectomy, UPPP, sinus/septoplasty/turbinate reduction; head and neck cancers) and our adults who are 7-days postop tonsilletomy can't get any more norco when they're in the worst pain of their life. It's horrible.

Is there no way around this? In IL, I can only Rx opioids for 7 days at Walmarts but there are ways around this: increase the frequency of meds, discuss this with the phamacist personally, encourage the pt to utilize a different pharmacy.

This is horrible

Specializes in Nephrology, Cardiology, ER, ICU.
Why can they not get more? Are you saying that in your state patients can not get another script after the initial 7 days?

Our surgery teams here are disgruntled by the change because they get more phone calls for script refills and/or need to see patients in clinic 7-days post-op to refill their initial script, but they are not prevented from giving additional medication.

I live in a very rural area and travel 100-200 miles per day to see pts. I'm not always at their location when they need pain meds. I've on occasion driven extra to either drop a script off at a pharmacy. However, when you are talking rural America, there are more barriers to obtaining scripts of any kind: distance, limited pharmacies, limited pharmacy hours, inability to travel to the pharmacy to pick up a script.

So, yes, while I CAN write another script after the 7 day script is gone, its not always an easy task to accomplish.

Is there no way around this? In IL, I can only Rx opioids for 7 days at Walmarts but there are ways around this: increase the frequency of meds, discuss this with the phamacist personally, encourage the pt to utilize a different pharmacy.

This is horrible

The pharmacy reads the sig and dispenses quantity for 7 days worth only, regardless of the quantity written. If it's 1 tab q 4-6 PRN pain, #60, the pharmacy will give 42 (1 6 times a day x 7 days). When postop pts call to get additional narcotics, I'll call the pharmacy and verify if their insurance will allow it or not. There's some database that prescribers have to check before giving any additional narcotics, and if another provider has given a script then they can't give more, if there's no other script in a certain timeframe they can give more. It's fairly new so I'm still trying to figure out the methodology. I do check with the pharmacy every time, though. One told me it was acceptable because it was a continuation of an acute fill. It's crazy.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
I live in a very rural area and travel 100-200 miles per day to see pts. I'm not always at their location when they need pain meds. I've on occasion driven extra to either drop a script off at a pharmacy. However, when you are talking rural America, there are more barriers to obtaining scripts of any kind: distance, limited pharmacies, limited pharmacy hours, inability to travel to the pharmacy to pick up a script.

So, yes, while I CAN write another script after the 7 day script is gone, its not always an easy task to accomplish.

That's an understandable concern. It's sad that having the ability to transmit scheduled substances electronically is something that EMR systems charge extra for. It would eliminate a number of logistical problems.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
The pharmacy reads the sig and dispenses quantity for 7 days worth only, regardless of the quantity written. If it's 1 tab q 4-6 PRN pain, #60, the pharmacy will give 42 (1 6 times a day x 7 days). When postop pts call to get additional narcotics, I'll call the pharmacy and verify if their insurance will allow it or not. There's some database that prescribers have to check before giving any additional narcotics, and if another provider has given a script then they can't give more, if there's no other script in a certain timeframe they can give more. It's fairly new so I'm still trying to figure out the methodology. I do check with the pharmacy every time, though. One told me it was acceptable because it was a continuation of an acute fill. It's crazy.

Are you a prescriber?

How it works for me: Prior to writing any script for a schedule II, chronic or acute, I need to login to the Prescription Monitoring Program (which interconnects with 33 other states) and assess the prior CS history and document my assessment. I can then write a 7-day (acute initial) or 28-day script (acute additional or chronic) which needs to be on hard copy and hand-signed. That script can either be handed to the patient or mailed to the pharmacy. Patients can not fill another script until 2 days prior to the end of the previous script. If the pharmacist has concerns they will call. If the insurance company requires a prior authorization, then that needs to be done or the patient has to pay cash.

Specializes in Critical Care; Cardiac; Professional Development.
I live in a very rural area and travel 100-200 miles per day to see pts. I'm not always at their location when they need pain meds. I've on occasion driven extra to either drop a script off at a pharmacy. However, when you are talking rural America, there are more barriers to obtaining scripts of any kind: distance, limited pharmacies, limited pharmacy hours, inability to travel to the pharmacy to pick up a script.

So, yes, while I CAN write another script after the 7 day script is gone, its not always an easy task to accomplish.

This is such incredibly valuable info to have and info that so many either do not realize or willfully overlook. There are vast areas of the country now without adequate resources for healthcare, from providers to pharmacies. I had not considered how these restrictions impact those areas.

I want to be very plain. I am PRO pain control. I just find myself in moral distress at times, particularly on a personal level due to said family member, because of the issue of abuse. I love BostonFNP's categorizations above. It makes something that can feel really murky far more distinguishable.

+ Add a Comment