RaDonda Vaught is seeking reinstatement of her Tennessee (TN) nursing license after a fatal medication error in 2017.
Updated:
TN state nursing board's 2021 decision to revoke her nursing license will be appealed in court on Tuesday, March 28. If the appeal is successful, she will face a retrial before the Tennessee Board of Nursing.
Nursing boards generally make decisions regarding the reinstatement of nursing licenses based on various factors, including the nature and severity of an offense, the rehabilitation efforts of the individual, and their ability to practice nursing safely and competently.
If RaDonda Vaught has completed the requirements (if any) and demonstrated that she could meet the standards of safe and competent nursing practice, then it may be possible for her to have her RN license reinstated. However, this decision ultimately rests with the state nursing board.
Most of us recall the RaDonda Vaught case in 2017 because it involved a fatal medication error, and she was charged with reckless homicide for the mistake. The decision to prosecute her made history because it set a precedent for criminalizing medical errors.
On December 26, 2017, RaDonda Vaught, a 35-year-old RN, worked as a "help-all" nurse at the Nashville, Tennessee-based Vanderbilt University Medical Center. She was sent to Radiology Services to administer VERSED (midazolam) to Charlene Murphey, a 75-year-old woman recovering from a brain injury and scheduled for a PET scan.
Charlene Murphey was experiencing anxiety, and her provider ordered Versed, a sedative, to help her through the procedure. RaDonda entered the letters "ve" for Versed (the brand name) in the automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) search field.
No matches populated the screen under the patient's profile, so RaDonda used the ADC override function and again entered "ve," this time mistakenly selecting vecuronium.
Vecuronium is a neuromuscular blocking agent, and patients must be mechanically ventilated when administered vecuronium. RaDonda reconstituted the drug and administered what she thought was one mg of Versed.
Unaware of her mistake, RaDonda left the patient unmonitored and went on to her next help-all assignment in the ED to conduct a swallow test.
Charlene Murphey was discovered about 30 minutes later by a transporter who noticed she wasn't breathing. She had sustained an unwitnessed respiratory arrest and was pulseless. She was coded, intubated, and taken back to ICU but was brain-dead and died within twelve hours.
Legal System
On February 4th, 2019, RaDonda was indicted and arrested on charges of reckless criminal homicide and impaired adult abuse.
On May 13, 2022, she was found guilty of criminally negligent homicide and gross neglect of an impaired adult, and sentenced to 3 years of supervised probation.
Board of Nursing
On September 27, 2019, the TN Department of Health (Nursing Board) reversed its previous decision not to pursue discipline against the nurse and charged RaDonda Vaught with:
On July 23, 2021, at the BON disciplinary trial, the Tennessee (TN) Board of Nursing revoked RaDonda Vaught's professional nursing license indefinitely, fined her $3,000, and stipulated that she pay up to $60,000 in prosecution costs.
Many opposed RaDonda Vaught being charged with a crime, including the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN), the Institute of Safe Medicine Practice (ISMP), and the American Nurses Association (ANA).
If nurses fear reporting their errors for fear of criminal charges, it discourages ethical principles of honesty.
But should RaDonda be allowed to practice nursing again?
The (ISMP) felt strongly that revoking her license was a travesty and that the severity of the outcome wrongly influenced the decision. Contributing system errors were minimized, and RaDonda Vaught became the scapegoat, while Vanderbilt escaped full notoriety.
The ISMP said RaDonda displayed human error and at-risk behaviors but not reckless behavior. She did not act with evil intent and is a second victim of a fatal error. In a Just Culture, discipline is not meted out for human error.
Do you think RaDonda Vaught should be allowed to practice nursing again, and why or why not?
Thank you for your thoughts!
Wuzzie said:Many of us started in the ICU (I started in NICU) and managed to not kill anyone. It depends on the individual. Also, she wasn't "floating" she was a resource person working in her own unit. I have more than twice your experience and have worked at the highest level of my license for many of those years. My opinion is not wrong.
Nope, your opinions aren't wrong either. And somewhere between your 30 + years and my 15 something to the very core of our profession has gone terribly, terribly wrong. We didn't even track medical errors before like 1999. To Err is Human report estimated between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths a year. Now the estimates are 251,000 to 440,000 a year. We have more technology to prevent error than we ever have and error has increased?
I have experienced medical error. I had a whole MRI discuss my hip replacement and the MD call in meds r/t that result. I have never had a hip replacement and my MRI was off my back. And all the other crap I have seen and experienced as a nurse. I trust that most healthcare providers are good people trying to do a decent job. I don't trust ANY of us with my care. We are, even on a good day, to distracted, over worked, and poorly educated to achieve good results. I have worked at top 10 hospitals and the little hospital down the road. I have seen how much culture affects the outcome and I feel that standards are dropping because we are not addressing the core of these issues. We are eating our own and allowing profit to dictate our outcomes more than ethics.
Do I want RV as a nurse, no. Do I want a nurse in recovery from drug addiction, no. However the amount of trust I have in a nurse who is neither of these is really not much greater....because the system is bad and a "good" nurse can't even do a "good" job now. Sure they are trying but they can't.
Defending RV....we already let people who commit grave medical errors just like hers back into the field. I just do see why her case is different. I'm not over here rooting for her and thinking she is a martyr. I'm just saying that her case is not different from many who already have gotten their license back and if we aren't going to punish the organizations making hands over fists money regardless of the killings they contribute to how is she more deserving of having her revenue resources cut off than those millionaires? I don't see her and Vanderbilt as two different problems....I see them as one in the same.
KalipsoRed21 said:Nope, your opinions aren't wrong either. And somewhere between your 30 + years and my 15 something to the very core of our profession has gone terribly, terribly wrong. We didn't even track medical errors before like 1999. To Err is Human report estimated between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths a year. Now the estimates are 251,000 to 440,000 a year. We have more technology to prevent error than we ever have and error has increased?
I have experienced medical error. I had a whole MRI discuss my hip replacement and the MD call in meds r/t that result. I have never had a hip replacement and my MRI was off my back. And all the other crap I have seen and experienced as a nurse. I trust that most healthcare providers are good people trying to do a decent job. I don't trust ANY of us with my care. We are, even on a good day, to distracted, over worked, and poorly educated to achieve good results. I have worked at top 10 hospitals and the little hospital down the road. I have seen how much culture affects the outcome and I feel that standards are dropping because we are not addressing the core of these issues. We are eating our own and allowing profit to dictate our outcomes more than ethics.Do I want RV as a nurse, no. Do I want a nurse in recovery from drug addiction, no. However the amount of trust I have in a nurse who is neither of these is really not much greater....because the system is bad and a "good" nurse can't even do a "good" job now. Sure they are trying but they can't.
Defending RV....we already let people who commit grave medical errors just like hers back into the field. I just do see why her case is different. I'm not over here rooting for her and thinking she is a martyr. I'm just saying that her case is not different from many who already have gotten their license back and if we aren't going to punish the organizations making hands over fists money regardless of the killings they contribute to how is she more deserving of having her revenue resources cut off than those millionaires? I don't see her and Vanderbilt as two different problems....I see them as one in the same.
Give me an example of someone convicted of killing a patient with criminal professional negligence and then allowed to practice again. Show me the cases that aren't different... the many who returned to a professional Healthcare practice after killing someone. I'll wait.
Next we can talk about how returning killer's to the professional ranks is not a good idea... even if other's aren't held to account that appears equitable.
toomuchbaloney said:I'm appalled/ shocked that a member claimed that nurses graduate as BSNs and apparently don't know how to safely function as a Basic Skilled Nurse. Safe medication administration is a basic nursing skill learned in the foundational class work and labs. If the degree mills are skipping that to make money then the profession is in big trouble... and so are the patients who depend upon them in high risk case environments where short staffing is a business model.
True, I feel we are in scary big trouble. That picking out the poor outcomes and holding those nurses for their fault in the problem alone just placates a system to feel that "Justice has been preformed", when no Justice has.
I'm not sorry that I just don't entirely agree with everyone...but I certainly am not the idiot others claim I am because I don't agree.
toomuchbaloney said:Give me an example of someone convicted of killing a patient with criminal professional negligence and then allowed to practice again. Show me the cases that aren't different... the many who returned to a professional Healthcare practice after killing someone. I'll wait.
Next we can talk about how returning killer's to the professional ranks is not a good idea... even if other's aren't held to account that appears equitable.
Whoa! There is a huge difference between recovering addicts returning to nursing and the situation we have here. Addiction is a treatable medical and emotional disease. Recovered nurses can make great employees. Sometimes they can work in jobs with access to drugs and sometimes they can't. In a minimum of a 2 year program during which your license is restricted (or removed), a person can reinvent their life into something healthy. RV has a character flaw which can't be treated which differentiates her from the other group you just slandered.
subee said:Whoa! There is a huge difference between recovering addicts returning to nursing and the situation we have here. Addiction is a treatable medical and emotional disease. Recovered nurses can make great employees. Sometimes they can work in jobs with access to drugs and sometimes they can't. In a minimum of a 2 year program during which your license is restricted (or removed), a person can reinvent their life into something healthy. RV has a character flaw which can't be treated which differentiates her from the other group you just slandered.
Oh dear. I replied to two incorrect posters at once. This was obviously for KR who was polite enough to say thanks for the conversation:)
subee said:Whoa! There is a huge difference between recovering addicts returning to nursing and the situation we have here. Addiction is a treatable medical and emotional disease. Recovered nurses can make great employees. Sometimes they can work in jobs with access to drugs and sometimes they can't. In a minimum of a 2 year program during which your license is restricted (or removed), a person can reinvent their life into something healthy. RV has a character flaw which can't be treated which differentiates her from the other group you just slandered.
I didn't compare the killer to addicts or nurse diverters.
KalipsoRed21 said:True, I feel we are in scary big trouble. That picking out the poor outcomes and holding those nurses for their fault in the problem alone just placates a system to feel that "Justice has been preformed", when no Justice has.
I'm not sorry that I just don't entirely agree with everyone...but I certainly am not the idiot others claim I am because I don't agree.
Someone called you an idiot? I missed that. Certainly the idea that the unrepentant and wildly unsafe RN should return to nursing practice is idiotic, IMV.
KalipsoRed21 said:True, I feel we are in scary big trouble. That picking out the poor outcomes and holding those nurses for their fault in the problem alone just placates a system to feel that "Justice has been preformed", when no Justice has.
I'm not sorry that I just don't entirely agree with everyone...but I certainly am not the idiot others claim I am because I don't agree.
I want to see the quote where someone claims you are an idiot. Many of us just shaking our heads because you seem to refuse to see the big picture: accountability and the consequences that go with it. Some of your replies show that you didn't thoroughly read her testimony or statements, or view her testimony. It was eye opening once you review in depth
Hoosier_RN said:I want to see the quote where someone claims you are an idiot. Many of us just shaking our heads because you seem to refuse to see the big picture: accountability and the consequences that go with it. Some of your replies show that you didn't thoroughly read her testimony or statements, or view her testimony. It was eye opening once you review in depth
Shaking our heads and wondering about the sheer number of nurses who seem unclear about what it means to be a health professional and have trouble understanding what seems to be clear evidence of criminal professional conduct. What are new nurses taught about the responsibility and accountability that accompanies a professional license to practice as a registered nurse?
toomuchbaloney said:What are new nurses taught about the responsibility and accountability that accompanies a professional license to practice as a registered nurse?
Apparently not what we were taught. But they are taught the 5 (now 7 or 8 or more) rights of med admin. But I've taught in the last 15 years. A few others on here have as well, so for that one poster that acts like patient safety isn't taught anymore, I say bull-loney! We all know better. Regardless of company culture, personal accountability still overrides all of that when patient safety is at stake, be it patient care, med admin, or patient teaching. We are the final stop on the patient journey to health
toomuchbaloney
16,056 Posts
I'm appalled/ shocked that a member claimed that nurses graduate as BSNs and apparently don't know how to safely function as a Basic Skilled Nurse. Safe medication administration is a basic nursing skill learned in the foundational class work and labs. If the degree mills are skipping that to make money then the profession is in big trouble... and so are the patients who depend upon them in high risk case environments where short staffing is a business model.