Published
Hey everyone! I'm new to this forum and I'm on here in hopes that someone can help me out. I believe I have finished all the required pre-reqs for entrance into the DNI ADN program. Note: I am NOT going in as an LVN, I'm hoping to just be admitted directly into the ADN program. So, just a few questions:
-How is the HESI? Which sections of the HESI does DNI require to be completed?
-Is the program very competitive?
-Is it possible that I could be accepted as early as the spring '11 semester?
-How are the classes and teachers?
-How expensive is the program?
I realize these are a lot of questions, but ANY information you can give me would be greatly appreciated :)
Thank you so much!
If you want it badly enough, commute to a nursing program in Oklahoma. The entrance requirements are not as stringent as they are in Texas. I lived in Fort Worth while driving to school in Oklahoma last year. In fact, half of my class was from Texas. It's certainly doable.For example, the nursing program at Murray State College only has one prerequisite (Chemistry). A&P is not even a prerequisite, so they'll happily accept the 'B' grades that you earned in those classes.
http://www.mscok.edu/jojeter/Nursing%20Information-Brochure%2011-08.pdf
Thanks, for all of your information. I am considering applying to Murray State College for their next class. How was the commute to OK?
i also applied for the generic adn program at dallas nursing institute back in june of 2010 for the fall of 2010. I never heard back from them until i went in to speak to one of the advisors the beginning of this week. They kept delaying their final selection and is now delaying the whole program for january of 2011. I thought it was weird that they never told the applicants why the application process was taking so long. I dont even think the school is accredited.....maybe im wrong.As for the hesi tests, they make you take all of the sections (grammar, math, reading comp., vocabulary, and anatomy and physiology. The test must be administered at that school too. They average your score by taking the grade from each section and average it out.
Hope my information helps you! Good luck!
hello i was going to appy t there school for the adn but it just doesnt sound right, but i just have to take the hesi, can anyone give me some insight on the a@p and math portion of the test. I have the study guide but it only goes so far into depth
nurseblaze
https://www.bon.texas.gov/pdfs/board_meetings_pdfs/2013/October/3-2-4-f.pdf
Agenda Item: 3.2.4.f
Prepared by: G.Varnell/V. Ayars
Board Meeting: October 2013
Report of a Survey Visit
Dallas Nursing Institute in Dallas, Texas
Associate Degree Nursing Education Program
Summary of Request
Consider the report of the June 20, 2013 survey visit to the Dallas Nursing Institute in Dallas, Texas
Associate Degree Nursing Education Program authorized by the Texas Board of Nursing at the January
2013 meeting due to the change of program approval status from Initial to Initial with Warning (See
Attachment #1). The survey visit was conducted by Gayle Varnell, PhD, APRN, CPNP-PC, Contracted
Program Evaluator.
Historical Perspective:
ï‚·
Dallas Nursing Institute (DNI) received initial approval from the Texas Board of Nursing (Board) to
establish an Associate Degree Nursing (ADN) education program at the April 2009 Board meeting and
began operation in Summer 2009. The first cohort of forty-seven (47) students was enrolled in January
2010. DNI, a private for-profit career school owned by ATI Enterprises, also operates a Vocational
Nursing (VN) education program that was established in 1991 and a Respiratory Therapy (RT) Program
that is in teach out status. The RT Program will be completed by September 30, 2013.
ï‚·
The educational entity holds approval from the Texas Workforce Commission and is authorized to grant
degrees by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
ï‚·
DNI is nationally accredited by the Accrediting Bureau of Health Education Schools (ABHES) with
ABHES accreditation through December 2016.
ï‚·
Gwendolyn Gaston, MSN, RN has served as the ADN program director since December 2010 and
meets all qualifications set forth by Board Rule 215.6. Administration and Organization.
ï‚·
Subsequent to the 2011 NCLEX-RN® examination pass rates, the nursing program administrators
initiated a comprehensive internal self-study to identify issues related to the 2011 NCLEX-RN®
examination pass rates.
ï‚·
The NCLEX-RN® examination pass rates for the past two (2) years are provided in the following table:
Exam Year NCLEX-RN®
Examination
Pass Rate
Number of
First-Time
Candidates
(Passed/Total)
BON Approval
Status
2012 65.22% 15/23 Initial
2011 62.75% 32/51 Initial
ï‚·
The program currently offers two (2) tracks: a generic ADN track and a Licensed Vocational Nurse
(LVN) to ADN track.
ï‚·
The program implemented a number of corrective measures to improve graduates' success on the
NCLEX-RN® examination, but the 2012 NCLEX-RN® examination pass rate was 65.22%.
ï‚·
The corrective measures included:
• securing an appropriate variety of rich clinical learning experiences necessary to prepare
professional nursing students for safe and competent practice;
• a critical evaluation of the program's admission criteria; and
• providing tutorials for at-risk students.
ï‚·
In December 2012, the ADN Program Director reported an enrollment of thirty-eight (38) students,
including thirty (30) unlicensed students (generic track) and eight (8) LVNs (LVN to ADN track).
ï‚·
At the June 2012 survey visit, the ADN Program Director reported an enrollment of forty-six (46)
students, including thirty-seven (37) unlicensed students (generic track) and nine (9) LVNs (LVN to
ADN track).
ï‚·
Due to Board actions at the October 2011 quarterly Board meeting, student enrollment in the AND
program was limited to no more than fifty (50) students to be admitted twice a year until the program
achieved full approval. The decision was based on concerns related to availability of appropriate clinical
learning experiences for professional nursing students.
ï‚·
According to the 2012 Nursing Education Program Information Survey (NEPIS), the program of study
includes 496 hours of didactic content and is comprised of the following clinical learning experiences:
Computer Lab = 48 hours
Skills Lab = 96 hours
Simulation Lab = 48 hours
Patient Care Clinical Situations = 624 hours
ï‚·
Data submitted on the 2012 NEPIS offer that nine (9) full-time faculty members and five (5) part-time
faculty members are employed, with two (2) full-time vacant faculty positions.
ï‚·
At the June 2012 survey visit, the ADN Program Director reported a total of eight (8) faculty [four (4)
full-time (3 MSN prepared and 1 MHA with more than twelve (12) credits toward an MSN) and two (2)
part-time, and two (2) full-time BSN prepared Teaching Assistants].
ï‚·
DNI has an articulation agreement with Lubbock Christian University to allow students to complete a
Baccalaureate Degree in Nursing.
ï‚·
An authorized survey visit due to change in program status from Initial to Initial with Warning to the
DNI-ADN Program was conducted on June 20, 2013 by Gayle Varnell, PhD, APRN, CPNP-PC,
Contract Program Evaluator (See Attachment #1).
Summary of Survey Findings:
ï‚·
Program Evaluator identified many strengths in the program.
ï‚·
Findings from the survey visit indicated that the program is essentially in compliance with Board Rule
215; however, the
Differentiated Essential Competencies (DECs) (2010) are not consistently applied
throughout the curriculum.
Pros and Cons from Survey Visit:
Pros:
ï‚·
The program has strong administrative and community support.
ï‚·
Michael Johnson, MBA, MEd, Director of Education was hired in May 2012 and has provided numerous
workshops and opportunities for the faculty to enhance their course delivery.
ï‚·
Faculty members appear to be a cohesive, dedicated group who has embraced technology to promote
success of students.
ï‚·
The curriculum is developed according to Board rules and the Differentiated Essential Competencies
(DECs) (2010
) objectives.
ï‚·
The program of study incorporates creative methods of using hybrid design for course delivery,
including online format, face-to-face instruction, and utilization of simulation.
ï‚·
The program has active contracts with multiple clinical affiliating agencies to ensure provision of a rich
variety of clinical learning experiences.
ï‚·
Students interviewed expressed satisfaction with the program.
ï‚·
The program meets a need in the community for a nursing education program and receives strong
support from clinical affiliates.
ï‚·
The program has adequate contracts with clinical affiliating agencies in order for students to meet all
clinical objectives in the program.
ï‚·
All clinical learning experiences occur in faculty supervised, direct-patient care, hands-on, clinical
settings. The program utilizes simulation to prepare students for hands-on patient care and for
remediation purposes.
ï‚·
The Self Study Report has been fully implemented.
ï‚·
Ten (10) of the currently enrolled forty-six (46) students will graduate in September 2013. Due to the
September 30, 2013 deadline to be counted in the 2013 NCLEX pass rate report, these students may
not make deadline.
Cons:
ï‚·
The program learning outcomes and course syllabi objectives do not fully reflect the Differentiated
Essential Competencies (DECs) (2010)
objectives.
Rationale for Staff Recommendations:
Rule 215.9(a) states, in part, that the program of study shall include both didactic and clinical learning
experiences and shall be designed and implemented to prepare students to demonstrate the
Differentiated
Essential Competencies (DECs)(2010).
Since an inconsistency of application of the DECs was evidenced by document review during the survey
visit, Board Staff recommend issuing a requirement that the program director and faculty review and revise
all curriculum documents to ensure consistency of the application of the DECs throughout.
Staff Recommendation:
Move to accept the report of findings of the authorized survey visit to the Dallas Nursing Institute in Dallas,
Texas Associate Degree Nursing Education Program and issue the following requirement, also noted in the
attached letter (See Attachment #2).
Requirement:
The program director and faculty shall review all curriculum documents to ensure consistency in the
application of the DECs throughout. The program director shall submit revised documents to Board Staff no
later than December 31, 2013.
https://www.bon.texas.gov/pdfs/board_meetings_pdfs/2013/October/3-2-4-f.pdf
Agenda Item: 3.2.4.f
Prepared by: G.Varnell/V. Ayars
Board Meeting: October 2013
Report of a Survey Visit
Dallas Nursing Institute in Dallas, Texas
Associate Degree Nursing Education Program
Summary of Request
Consider the report of the June 20, 2013 survey visit to the Dallas Nursing Institute in Dallas, Texas
Associate Degree Nursing Education Program authorized by the Texas Board of Nursing at the January
2013 meeting due to the change of program approval status from Initial to Initial with Warning (See
Attachment #1). The survey visit was conducted by Gayle Varnell, PhD, APRN, CPNP-PC, Contracted
Program Evaluator.
Historical Perspective:
ï‚·
Dallas Nursing Institute (DNI) received initial approval from the Texas Board of Nursing (Board) to
establish an Associate Degree Nursing (ADN) education program at the April 2009 Board meeting and
began operation in Summer 2009. The first cohort of forty-seven (47) students was enrolled in January
2010. DNI, a private for-profit career school owned by ATI Enterprises, also operates a Vocational
Nursing (VN) education program that was established in 1991 and a Respiratory Therapy (RT) Program
that is in teach out status. The RT Program will be completed by September 30, 2013.
ï‚·
The educational entity holds approval from the Texas Workforce Commission and is authorized to grant
degrees by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
ï‚·
DNI is nationally accredited by the Accrediting Bureau of Health Education Schools (ABHES) with
ABHES accreditation through December 2016.
ï‚·
Gwendolyn Gaston, MSN, RN has served as the ADN program director since December 2010 and
meets all qualifications set forth by Board Rule 215.6. Administration and Organization.
ï‚·
Subsequent to the 2011 NCLEX-RN® examination pass rates, the nursing program administrators
initiated a comprehensive internal self-study to identify issues related to the 2011 NCLEX-RN®
examination pass rates.
ï‚·
The NCLEX-RN® examination pass rates for the past two (2) years are provided in the following table:
Exam Year NCLEX-RN®
Examination
Pass Rate
Number of
First-Time
Candidates
(Passed/Total)
BON Approval
Status
2012 65.22% 15/23 Initial
2011 62.75% 32/51 Initial
ï‚·
The program currently offers two (2) tracks: a generic ADN track and a Licensed Vocational Nurse
(LVN) to ADN track.
ï‚·
The program implemented a number of corrective measures to improve graduates' success on the
NCLEX-RN® examination, but the 2012 NCLEX-RN® examination pass rate was 65.22%.
ï‚·
The corrective measures included:
• securing an appropriate variety of rich clinical learning experiences necessary to prepare
professional nursing students for safe and competent practice;
• a critical evaluation of the program's admission criteria; and
• providing tutorials for at-risk students.
ï‚·
In December 2012, the ADN Program Director reported an enrollment of thirty-eight (38) students,
including thirty (30) unlicensed students (generic track) and eight (8) LVNs (LVN to ADN track).
ï‚·
At the June 2012 survey visit, the ADN Program Director reported an enrollment of forty-six (46)
students, including thirty-seven (37) unlicensed students (generic track) and nine (9) LVNs (LVN to
ADN track).
ï‚·
Due to Board actions at the October 2011 quarterly Board meeting, student enrollment in the AND
program was limited to no more than fifty (50) students to be admitted twice a year until the program
achieved full approval. The decision was based on concerns related to availability of appropriate clinical
learning experiences for professional nursing students.
ï‚·
According to the 2012 Nursing Education Program Information Survey (NEPIS), the program of study
includes 496 hours of didactic content and is comprised of the following clinical learning experiences:
Computer Lab = 48 hours
Skills Lab = 96 hours
Simulation Lab = 48 hours
Patient Care Clinical Situations = 624 hours
ï‚·
Data submitted on the 2012 NEPIS offer that nine (9) full-time faculty members and five (5) part-time
faculty members are employed, with two (2) full-time vacant faculty positions.
ï‚·
At the June 2012 survey visit, the ADN Program Director reported a total of eight (8) faculty [four (4)
full-time (3 MSN prepared and 1 MHA with more than twelve (12) credits toward an MSN) and two (2)
part-time, and two (2) full-time BSN prepared Teaching Assistants].
ï‚·
DNI has an articulation agreement with Lubbock Christian University to allow students to complete a
Baccalaureate Degree in Nursing.
ï‚·
An authorized survey visit due to change in program status from Initial to Initial with Warning to the
DNI-ADN Program was conducted on June 20, 2013 by Gayle Varnell, PhD, APRN, CPNP-PC,
Contract Program Evaluator (See Attachment #1).
Summary of Survey Findings:
ï‚·
Program Evaluator identified many strengths in the program.
ï‚·
Findings from the survey visit indicated that the program is essentially in compliance with Board Rule
215; however, the
Differentiated Essential Competencies (DECs) (2010) are not consistently applied
throughout the curriculum.
Pros and Cons from Survey Visit:
Pros:
ï‚·
The program has strong administrative and community support.
ï‚·
Michael Johnson, MBA, MEd, Director of Education was hired in May 2012 and has provided numerous
workshops and opportunities for the faculty to enhance their course delivery.
ï‚·
Faculty members appear to be a cohesive, dedicated group who has embraced technology to promote
success of students.
ï‚·
The curriculum is developed according to Board rules and the Differentiated Essential Competencies
(DECs) (2010
) objectives.
ï‚·
The program of study incorporates creative methods of using hybrid design for course delivery,
including online format, face-to-face instruction, and utilization of simulation.
ï‚·
The program has active contracts with multiple clinical affiliating agencies to ensure provision of a rich
variety of clinical learning experiences.
ï‚·
Students interviewed expressed satisfaction with the program.
ï‚·
The program meets a need in the community for a nursing education program and receives strong
support from clinical affiliates.
ï‚·
The program has adequate contracts with clinical affiliating agencies in order for students to meet all
clinical objectives in the program.
ï‚·
All clinical learning experiences occur in faculty supervised, direct-patient care, hands-on, clinical
settings. The program utilizes simulation to prepare students for hands-on patient care and for
remediation purposes.
ï‚·
The Self Study Report has been fully implemented.
ï‚·
Ten (10) of the currently enrolled forty-six (46) students will graduate in September 2013. Due to the
September 30, 2013 deadline to be counted in the 2013 NCLEX pass rate report, these students may
not make deadline.
Cons:
ï‚·
The program learning outcomes and course syllabi objectives do not fully reflect the Differentiated
Essential Competencies (DECs) (2010)
objectives.
Rationale for Staff Recommendations:
Rule 215.9(a) states, in part, that the program of study shall include both didactic and clinical learning
experiences and shall be designed and implemented to prepare students to demonstrate the
Differentiated
Essential Competencies (DECs)(2010).
Since an inconsistency of application of the DECs was evidenced by document review during the survey
visit, Board Staff recommend issuing a requirement that the program director and faculty review and revise
all curriculum documents to ensure consistency of the application of the DECs throughout.
Staff Recommendation:
Move to accept the report of findings of the authorized survey visit to the Dallas Nursing Institute in Dallas,
Texas Associate Degree Nursing Education Program and issue the following requirement, also noted in the
attached letter (See Attachment #2).
Requirement:
The program director and faculty shall review all curriculum documents to ensure consistency in the
application of the DECs throughout. The program director shall submit revised documents to Board Staff no
later than December 31, 2013.
Is anyone supposed to be able to decipher all of this?
cchapman2
20 Posts
Thank you! You've been so helpful :) Looks like I might not be hopelessly lost after all!