Question about some labs

Nurses General Nursing

Published

I guess this can be kind of a case study, if you will.

A coworker of mine was taking care of a patient (we'll call her Mrs. X). Mrs. X is day of surgery from some type of joint arthroplasty. Estimated blood loss

Mrs. X has no medical history whatsoever besides severe arthritis. Bone on bone, etc etc.

Mrs. X is lying in bed receiving D5NS0.9 @ 125 CC per hour through a 20ga IV on the dorsal side of her left hand.

The phlebotomist showed up to draw a CBC/Chem7/INR/PT...the standard stuff.

About 15 minutes after the phlebotomist left, the lab called and said Mrs. X had several critical lab values.

WBC 2.3

HGB 5.1

Glucose 821

And some others...I can't remember offhand. Those were the biggies.

Upon assessment, Mrs. X is lying in bed. Cap refill

My coworker is at this point flipping out because the glucose is 821. She pages the physician. Physician went monkey over the phone, but ordered a stat redraw. In the meantime, my coworker is prepping to send this patient to the ICU. Physician is freaking out whereever he is, and is calling for updates every 2 minutes.

Between the time the phlebotomist left and the time the original labs were phoned to us, Mrs. X had gotten up and walked 10' to the bathroom and back with a walker and a stand-by assist.

10 minutes later, All the labs came back normal.

Complete fluke with the labs?

The original lab was drawn in the AC area, in the same arm that the IV was infusing. The second lab draw was taken from the other arm where the IV wasn't infusing. I said, "Well, what probably happened was that the D5NS was simultaneously boosting the sugar and diluting the rest of the blood." None of my coworkers took my theory seriously. Even one of the "seasoned" nurses said, "no that's ridiculous, they probably got the vial mixed up with someone elses somewhere else in the hospital!!"

Now, I'm no chemistry/lab expert, but I don't think my theory is far off. I had an asymptomatic patient with an HGB of 6.5 one time and the physician suggested it was a diluted sample and a redraw (the physician was wrong in that case, but that's besides the point). I was just wondering if anyone has run into this type of thing before. Is it conceivable that dextrose would show up as glucose in a lab test? They're very similar chemically. Maybe someone with more chemistry experience can either back me up or refute my theory?

ps:No one was freaking out except the nurse that had the patient, we were all kind of "meh" after we realized the patient was completely asymptomatic.

I would have ordered a redraw before calling the doc. I know my docs are going to say redraw. We have had redraws come back funky and the techs had the machines checked and it ended up being the machines...

Specializes in neuro, ICU/CCU, tropical medicine.

If the patient had D5NS running, I'll bet the Chem 7 also showed hypernatremia.

I've seen that happen more times than I care to count. The same thing happens drawing from central lines if the line isn't flushed and an adequate waste is drawn or fluids aren't stopped while drawing.

Specializes in neuro, ICU/CCU, tropical medicine.
would dextrose show up as glucose?

Dextrose and glucose are synonyms.

Specializes in Tele, Infectious Disease, OHN.

As an old lab tech I can assure you that you are right. There are several things you can do to mess up labs, from drawing above an IV to putting the blood in the wrong (anticoagulant) tubes. Sounds like you were right on the money.

or...

it sounds like the lab messed up.

i've had to get repeat labs a lot, r/t the initial values being questionable.

they could have erroneously given you another pt's labs.

labs make mistakes, just like everyone else.

it sounds like you had a great handle on it.

good job.

leslie

Specializes in Ortho, Case Management, blabla.
If the patient had D5NS running, I'll bet the Chem 7 also showed hypernatremia.

I'm not sure offhand but pretty much every single lab result was screwed up. I wouldn't be surprised if the NA was off the chart as well.

Dextrose and glucose are synonyms.

Thank you for pointing that out. I have never been good with chemistry, and I suppose I'm completely retarded. My experience with this kind of stuff is limited. A quick check revealed that you are absolutely 100% correct. I suppose nursing school killed quite a few of my brain cells ...obviously including the ones from the A+P lecture and IV practicals that taught me that fact. Thanks for jogging my memory though; I'll never forget.

Specializes in neuro, ICU/CCU, tropical medicine.
I have never been good with chemistry, and I suppose I'm completely retarded.

I had to look it up to be sure.

You are 100% correct with your theory. I am a clinical lab scientist and I see this frequently in the lab. It is a hallmark of D5W contamination for an H&H, WBC, and PLT to drop from this, as well as the MCV to rise (from glucose swelling the RBCs). Also in chemistry, the K, CA, and other parameters are affected (diluted) and the glucose significantly increased.

If I saw this specimen, I would not have bothered to give you those results. To me it was obvious and the lab "tech" who produced those results gives the rest of us a bad name. He/she better learn to recognize IV fluid contamination, not just with D5W, but with TPN, NS, HNS, etc. I can't stand reading stories like this about idiot techs who do bone-headed things. Also, I'm amazed that the nurse or the doctor would actually entertain the thought that those results were correct; I mean, the patient didn't exhibit signs of having a critically low potassium, etc.

Your coworkers are dismissive fools to say that the lab mixed up the tubes. Please. That's just the stock answer for anyone not intelligent enough to actually think through a problem.

I know of a lab scientist who transposed a PT and PTT result once (the PT 18.0 and the PTT >240). The nurse was notified that the PTT was >240 (verbal) but the written report said that the PTT was 18.0. The doctor freaked and gave a big bolus of heparin. I mean, what fool looks at a PT/PTT set of results where it is OBVIOUS the PT is wrong (and if it was correct, would be critically high) and then bolus a patient? Of course the scientist had to take ALL the blame, because God knows a Doctor NEVER makes a mistake! BTW, that was not me, in case any of you are thinking that.

If the patient had D5NS running, I'll bet the Chem 7 also showed hypernatremia.

Perhaps, but most likely the chloride is the biggest giveaway when looking at the NA/CL results (contamination with NS)

Specializes in Trauma Surgery, Nursing Management.

Nice catch, OP! I am having a hard time with the fact that your co-workers poo poohed your theory. Critical thinking skills are so important.

Specializes in Intermediate care.

It is our hospital policy anytime a blood sugar comes back as "critical" (anything above 350), we are to order a re-draw and don't need physicians orders. so if i see a blood sugar sky high, i don't panic. We can do point of care testing at bedside, so we just do that a 2nd time...or if it is above 600 it needs to be done by Lab...so i'll just re-order it and call after i re-order.

Highest blood sugar i've seen??? 2,000!!!!! No joke!. When i called the doctor on this one jokingly said "What the hell did you give him? IV push mountain dew?"

+ Add a Comment