Pro Life?

Published

Just wondering how the pro lifers feel about this?

7 years old and I wonder how much happiness she was able to accumulate? 

I personally think that children until the age of thirteen should only be allowed to be children and play to their hearts content with some structure for education etc. 

I wonder how many opportunities this little girl had to do that and who should bear the responsibility? 

Specializes in Hospice.
19 minutes ago, GordonGekko said:

I didn't realize slavery existed in Texas...This isn't Sudan where Africans are still enslaving each other to this day.

You are in favor of forcing women to bear children they don’t want, against their own beliefs, in service to your beliefs and economic benefit. That is slavery.

4
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in MSN, FNP-C, PMHNP, CEN, CCRN, TCRN, EMT-P.
18 minutes ago, heron said:

You are in favor of forcing women to bear children they don’t want, against their own beliefs, in service to your beliefs and economic benefit. That is slavery.

My economic benefit?  That is some backwards logic you are using to justify infant genocide.  You are in favor of allowing a woman to murder a child because they made irresponsible decisions in life.

Its pretty simple.  If a woman doesn't want to have a baby they can abstinent.  Barring extreme cases where the fetus isn't viable and a threat to the womans life nothing can justify murdering an innocent infant.  People pushing this vile agenda really have no place in healthcare and will eventually face judgment.  

2
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in Hospice.

Sez you … once again, a matter of belief, not objectively verifiable fact. Not your place to dictate others’ beliefs or demand that they live according to yours.

Curious, isn’t it, how an uber-capitalist alpha lizard such as yourself is unaware of the effects of labor costs on a business’ bottom line. Or maybe you’re just being disingenuous and trying to downplay your support of slavery.

You might also have a chat with your scriptwriter - his/her English is starting to crack.

2
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in MSN, FNP-C, PMHNP, CEN, CCRN, TCRN, EMT-P.
14 minutes ago, heron said:

Sez you … once again, a matter of belief, not objectively verifiable fact. Not your place to dictate others’ beliefs or demand that they live according to yours.

Curious, isn’t it, how an uber-capitalist alpha lizard such as yourself is unaware of the effects of labor costs on a business’ bottom line. Or maybe you’re just being disingenuous and trying to downplay your support of slavery.

You might also have a chat with your scriptwriter - his/her English is starting to crack.

What are the point of any laws?  Do you think its okay to go into the store and kill a bunch of people?  Well I guess if you do its your matter of belief and murdering random people in a store being wrong is not an "objectively verifiable fact".

The fact of the matter is there is a life growing inside a woman's body when they are pregnant.  Terminating that life is murder plain and simple.  If you don't agree with the laws in Texas placed to protect those who cannot protect themselves from murderers then don't live there.

"Uber capitalists" like myself do not support slavery.  Capitalism is freedom and equality, it gives everyone the opportunity to start their own Amazon if they want to.  You are simply trying to divert from the topic at hand which is murdering innocent children.

2
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in Hospice.

You can try to reframe the issue all you want, your pejorative labeling applies only to you and those who believe as you do. Using your (I assume) religious beliefs to dictate another person’s life choices is a violation of our constitutional freedom of, and from, religion.

Forcing anyone to continue a pregnancy against her will is slavery, pure and simple.

5
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in MSN, FNP-C, PMHNP, CEN, CCRN, TCRN, EMT-P.
23 minutes ago, heron said:

You can try to reframe the issue all you want, your pejorative labeling applies only to you and those who believe as you do. Using your (I assume) religious beliefs to dictate another person’s life choices is a violation of our constitutional freedom of, and from, religion.

Forcing anyone to continue a pregnancy against her will is slavery, pure and simple.

Murder plain and simple.  Shows the complete degradation of morality in America where woman try to justify murdering a child because they can't be responsible.  Sad world we live in.  

1
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in Hospice.
17 hours ago, GordonGekko said:

Murder plain and simple.  Shows the complete degradation of morality in America where woman try to justify murdering a child because they can't be responsible.  Sad world we live in.  

Yes, lizard tycoons preaching the enslavement of women. Sad, indeed.

1
Up Vote Up Vote ×

Hmm.. I wouldn’t spend too much time arguing with someone who is clearly either a misogynistic religious zealot or a mega-sized troll. It reminds me of the old adage; Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.

As any medical or nursing professional who has done his or her research knows, banning abortions doesn’t really save lives. It just leads to higher morbidity and mortality among women. So that argument is a non-starter. People who advocate outlawing abortions don’t have women’s best interest at heart, and really don’t care if they suffer or die. If they cared about women and genuinely cared about children once they are born, they would be devoting their energy to minimizing the number of unplanned pregnancies that occur and support parents after the child is born if the family needs it.

An embryo or a fetus ≠ an infant. This ranting about murder, murder is rather tiresome. 

Lots of talk about women not behaving responsibly. Not a single word about men’s responsibility. Funny that. One wonders how the dude thinks babies are made. 

The US already has significantly higher infant and maternal mortality rates than most other rich nations. Crazy laws like this one will just increase the divide. 
 

 


Gekko, I think that some Minister posts are still vacant in the newly formed Taliban government in Afghanistan. Consider applying, you’d fit right in. 

 

5
Up Vote Up Vote ×
22 hours ago, heron said:

You are in favor of forcing women to bear children they don’t want, against their own beliefs, in service to your beliefs and economic benefit. That is slavery.

Economic benefit may absolutely be a part of it but I think it’s mostly about control. A certain type of men can’t be happy unless they have women under their thumbs. They feel threatened by independent women. 
 

I have absolutely nothing against a person who doesn’t want an abortion for themselves, whether that is for religious reasons or some other reason. I totally support their right to choose and follow their conscience. But that right extends only to themselves. Not to me or anyone else. 
 

This is a serious topic but I can’t help but feel a bit amused about the utter stupidity and ginormous hypocrisy of posters here who are against vaccine mandates but support people having the right to force a woman carry a pregnancy to term against her wishes. I don’t know how these people can keep a straight face when they look themselves in the mirror.

The health risks of a pregnancy are many times larger than that of an approved vaccine, and after a pregnancy you end up responsible for another human life for at least eighteen years. After getting vaccinated you get a much lower chance of getting severely ill and perhaps dying, and as a bonus you get to help protect the community you are a part of.

The forced pregnancy crowd only seem to value ”my body, my choice” when it comes to their bodies, but women all over the world shouldn’t have that freedom. (According to their warped thinking). 
 

I am much more consistent in how I view personal liberties. I support women’s right to choose what their bodies are used for and I’m against forcefully injecting vaccines into people against their will. 

4
Up Vote Up Vote ×

So I am kinda worried when women begin ruling if you they are going to outlaw wanking for men since we are killing all of these lives according to republicans! 

Do you think that might be the reason that republican men keep wanting to control women, so you guys don't ban the only thing that men have to do, when you take power? 

I mean if they keep saying that women are killing an unborn child, then logically, we are murdering millions every day when we have to take a 'stress break' ????????

1
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in MSN, FNP-C, PMHNP, CEN, CCRN, TCRN, EMT-P.
On 8/30/2021 at 3:39 PM, Curious1997 said:

Just wondering how the pro lifers feel about this?

7 years old and I wonder how much happiness she was able to accumulate? 

I personally think that children until the age of thirteen should only be allowed to be children and play to their hearts content with some structure for education etc. 

I wonder how many opportunities this little girl had to do that and who should bear the responsibility? 

So your solution is to just murder them instead.  Look at Ben Carson he grew up in the hood.  What if he was aborted?  "Pro Choice" people are simply trying to limit the amount of minorities in this nation and are very selfish people as they would rather murder an innocent child than take responsibility for having intercourse.

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in Hospice.
2 hours ago, GordonGekko said:

So your solution is to just murder them instead.  Look at Ben Carson he grew up in the hood.  What if he was aborted?  "Pro Choice" people are simply trying to limit the amount of minorities in this nation and are very selfish people as they would rather murder an innocent child than take responsibility for having intercourse.

Sure beats slavery, especially for the minorities you claim to be defending.

4
Up Vote Up Vote ×
+ Join the Discussion