Pet Peeve: Poor Grammar by Nurses

Published

One thing that is nails on chalkboard to me is when I hear my fellow nurses use double negatives and other blatant grammar mistakes. I'm speaking of English as a first language, domestically born and raised people.

I feel as this detracts from the professional image of nursing. We are supposed to be educated professionals. Poor grammar makes nursing look like a blue collar trade to those who are educated, such as our physicians and many members of the public.

Let me clarify that I don't harshly judge the intelligence or moral character of people with poor grammar. But, I feel strongly that nurses should project an image of being educated professionals in our speech and demeanor. Thanks for reading.

Specializes in ER, ICU, L&D, OR.
I have a friend who does this and it's all I can do to keep from screaming.

And your friend knows this and deliberately does too I bet. Just for the reaction.

I just saw this one on another thread:

"would of" instead of "would have" or "would've"

And your friend knows this and deliberately does too I bet. Just for the reaction.

But I give no reaction, I don't want her to think I'm trying to talk down to her so I just go on as if nothing happened. Inside, though, I'm screaming like Sam Kinison.

Thank you for bringing this issue to the discussion!!!! I get so frustrated when words are mispelled. We all make mistakes, but some people just don't care about spelling and grammar. "Orientated" is not a word!!!:angryfire

Thank you for bringing this issue to the discussion!!!! I get so frustrated when words are mispelled. We all make mistakes, but some people just don't care about spelling and grammar. "Orientated" is not a word!!!:angryfire

misspelled ;)

We certainly do all make mistakes. I probably could fill this whole thread with mine alone! :chuckle

Specializes in pure and simple psych.
How about "I've been impacted by my lack of activity and usage of percocet?" ;)

:lol2::lol2::lol2: Yup, that would be it, all right.

Specializes in pure and simple psych.
How about the wrong usage of its and it's? And try convincing people that there is no such word as its.'

Here's one of my "nails on a chalkboard" peeves. "Would have went." Arrgghhh. I can't help it. The audible reaction is involuntary.

Less vs. fewer.

Unauthorized use of apostrohpes. Welcome to the Smith's. The Smith's what?

Sad, but true. When someone pronounces short lived (long I sound) correctly, my husband knows to brace himself for a hurrah. Again, an involuntary reaction.

As for this principle applied to the written word, look at chaise longue, which has been thoroughly corrupted into chaise lounge. I can't bring myself to use the former (how sad when the correct spelling seems an affectation), but I refuse to use the latter.

"Would have went" gets me too, and who would guess that the correct spelling USED to be "dough nut" as in a nut (as with bolt) made of dough???:idea:

Can I take this thread a step further and bring up the ever peeve-y/somewhat grammar related topic of telephone manners? I think it requires a thread all its own. ;)

*would like fellow posters to note her grammatically correct use of its*

Specializes in pure and simple psych.
Myriad and many are perfect substitutes. Many is also a noun and an adjective.

We're more familiar with the adjective. I have many favorite foods.

But it can also be a noun. Among the many are pizza, chicken and steak.

Myriad--adjective. There are myriad Chinese recipes I would like to try.

Myriad--noun. Scattered throughout the conforming myriads were a few who didn't fit in.

If many cannot be used in place of myriad(s), then myriad(s) is not being used properly. In fact, I suggest that myriad(s) be used sparingly and many be put in its place whenever suitable.

Hope this helps.

I think I love you. Beautiful explanation, rn-writer.... Yes, it does:kiss.

Specializes in pure and simple psych.

Feeling just slightly PARANOID to post anything at all in this thread, let me add my most persistent coldchillsdowntheback experience:

Nauseous vs noxious. As in, "It made me noxious (I caused nausea.)" rather than "It made me nauseous (It made me feel sick to my stomach.)":barf02:

A toxic substance is a noxious one, it causes nausea. Unless one made someone else nauseated, one could not say, "I was noxious."

There. There, now, all better.

Specializes in ICU, PACU.

Don't mean to beat a dead horse but....

I would expect to orient someone to the unit. After a few weeks of orientation, they would have been oriented.;)

If you look in a dictionary, both are acceptable - orient and orientate. They are both synonymous with each other.

If I'm not extremely careful, I use 'mucous' and 'mucus' interchangeably.

I hate homophones. :angryfire

+ Join the Discussion