Published Apr 8, 2009
tina_the_nurse
8 Posts
I am an RN in a 37 bed Emergency Room in the second largest city in Illinois. We have recently been told by management that we are going from a 3:1 patient ratio to a 4:1 plus a hallway patient next month due to the "bad economy". Let me first begin by saying we see from 80,000 to 100,000 patients a year and are currently being staffed with 13 nurses per shift on an ideal day, to a low of 10 nurses on the weekend. We all work 12 hour shifts, 3 days per week. Needless to say, there is poor moral and discontent circulating the floor. We have hired 14 new nurses in the past year to rectify the nursing shortage we previously had and finally have shown a significant decrease in "left without being seen" percentages and an increase in our patient satisfaction scores to an alltime high.
My question is are there any regulations that determine how many patients can be assigned to an emergency room RN and what can be done to change the current mandate by upper management? I have strongly voiced my opinion to management and the changes are non-negotiable. Realistically we cannot refuse the assignment and under current situations most of us will be burned out in the near future. Wondering if anyone else has been through a similar situation and how was it handled?
xos4eva
107 Posts
I currently work in a nonprofit facility in NYC. We currently see approximately the same amount of patients that you see at your facility. Our staffing is usually 8 nurses on a good day. Our facility is broken into zones, there are 3 zones, 3 beds in each zone. there is one nurse assigned to each zone. On a busy day the beds are sometimes doubled so at any given time a nurse can have from 7-14 pts. We also work 3 days a week 12 hour shifts. As far as low morale or being burned out. Please thank God that you only have 5 pts max. I wish we could say the same.
PAERRN20
660 Posts
1:4 or 1:5 is pretty much the standard I have seen. I can't imagine having 7-14 patients like the previous poster mentioned. Wow! Talk about unsafe!
Thanks for the insight and may I never have to work in an ER that I personally am taking care of 7-14 critical patients at one time...
mmutk, BSN, RN, EMT-I
482 Posts
1:4 is pretty much standard these days and the recommended staffing from the ENA. In california 1:4 is law I believe.
I have seen it as a 1:7 or 1:10 in a fast track (minor setting). I still think that is too high though.
You guys will be able to handle 1:4 + hall in what you are describing, but I'm sure moral will be low.
mwboswell
561 Posts
We're discussing this on another thread also, you may want to check it under:
Specialty/Nursing Specialties/Emergency Nursing/Nurse-to-patient-ratio
Hope this helps.
MikeyBSN
439 Posts
Aside from CA, I don't think there are any states that have a limit on nurse to patient ratios. When I started I would have eight, nine, sometimes even ten patients. I might have a regular section with 8 pts and then one or two more pysch patients or drunks in the hall. New management has done of good job of reducing our ratios. I now typically have 6 non-fast track patients.
loricatus
1,446 Posts
Yep. Have had those ratios in NYC and LI ERs-seems pretty standard for there. Best I had was 1:6; but, that was right after orientation and quickly went to 1:8. Got burnt out, moved away and had to switch specialties a while because of the burn out. 1:4 plus a hall bed would seem like a vacation.
dmarciniak
3 Posts
I work in an inner-city hosptial in Buffalo, 35,000 patients a year, average about 100 a day. We have a ratio of 1:5. Hall beds are the responsibility of the CN. Our hall use in total minutes went from 16% to 0.6% in two years once the CN's took them. We also opened a PRN express section staffed by a PA and nurse when warrented. In our busy season (jan-feb-mar) we often feel completely overwhelmed.
gonzo1, ASN, RN
1,739 Posts
Have worked in ERs where I had up to 14 pts at a time. The ENA recommends 4.
Unfortunately I am afraid that more is going to be the norm in the future. Things are just going from bad to worse anymore.