Old Timer's Take on Fixing the Nursing Shortage

The nursing shortage has been exacerbated and accelerated by the Pandemic, no doubt about that. We need to replace those who have left and educate them even more to fill that gap. I am a firm believer in the "old way" of training, with additional post-training academics. Nurses General Nursing Article

Updated:   Published

The nursing shortage is starting to hurt, really bad.  These past few years have worn down some of the strongest and most talented nurses in the US, and they have either quit nursing or moved to greener Nursing pastures.  Sadly, this happened smack in the middle of a horrible pandemic when they were needed the most. 

Reasons for Nurses Leaving 

  1. Exhaustion
  2. Timely or early retirement        
  3. Refusing to get a mandatory COVID vaccine
  4. Going to travel nursing for better pay
  5. Family concerns during COVID
  6. Safer easier assignments elsewhere
  7. Sickness or death
  8. Pursuit of higher education
  9. Violence on the job, or 
  10. They were just plain sick of it. Burned out, PTSD, emotionally drained

Too many of them were all wrung out. They didn't have anything left to give. Nurses are human too.

An article in the Bangor Daily News before the pandemic discussed nurse retainment.  One hospital spokesperson stated that over half of new graduates left their new jobs before their first year was up.  They started replacing nurses with foreign nurses.  I wonder what they discussed in their exit interviews.  Did they ask WHY they left?  If they asked, what were the answers?  That was not covered in the newspaper story.  It made me wonder what they were doing to address the reasons that new nurses left.

Could it be that they were not staffed well enough?  Were they given a long enough training period with a preceptor?  Was the pay good?  Were they treated with respect and taught the ropes with patience?

I don't pretend to have all the answers, but I am an old nurse, and I have learned a thing or two.  Every patient is different, and so is every nurse.

kathy-graduation.jpg.c7ed0572c38b5436f057cec9784af746.jpg.704bce56fc6a7c766a153f732b58db0e.jpg

When I trained in nursing in 1967 (graduated in 1970), we started practicing our book learning in the second half of our first year.  I trained in a School of Nursing.  It was a 3-year program in a Catholic Hospital school, with rules, lots of rules, and very few vacation breaks.  We went to school and trained year-round.  Our fees covered books, room, board, schooling, and uniform laundering. If my memory serves me well the cost of our program for 3 years, all year, was around $1500...  I had a federal loan that was partially forgiven by my work after graduating.  A nursing student couldn't pay for books for that amount these days.  I paid the balance of my loan, around $800 several years after I graduated.  I was never strapped with student debt and exorbitant monthly payments.

Our first semester gave us all the necessary sciences.  The second semester we dove right into actual nursing fundamentals, and beyond that, we learned pharmacology and practiced in all of the specialties.  With the supervision of our instructor, we did all of the work of an RN.  We passed meds, and took full patient assignments.  We work/studied OBS/GYN, Med/Surg, psychiatric nursing, Operating room and recovery, pediatrics, and ICU.  We spent a good slug of time (generally a month or more) in each specialty and did our studies and hands-on practice simultaneously at times.   We also worked shift work with regular staff and in our senior year, we did Charge Nurse duty (all with instructor supervision). 

During our training, no cheating was allowed and we were monitored for it.   If you failed a subject, no matter how hard you worked, you were dismissed and had to repeat that entire year.  I always thought that was harsh, and that perhaps some tutoring might have been fairer.

My program was very tough.  I was never so proud or relieved as the day I graduated from that school. When I left, I felt like I had the world by the tail and I was a fully prepared nurse.  I passed my boards with flying colors on the first attempt. And, that was while I was sick with a horrid sore throat and fever!

I sincerely believe that an attempt to "get back to basics" is the way to go.  I admire and know many college-educated newer nurses.  I also know that they did not start their first jobs with the same confidence that my classmates and I did.  We were very confident in our skills because of hands-on training.

A 4-year program is fine, if you want to be a well academically rounded new nurse who will need a lot of nurse training once you start your first job as an RN.   Since there are barely enough nurses to go around, is that realistic...to have that expectation of your new employer?  Can an already overloaded staff nurse mentor you and still take safe good care of her own patients?

My idea is this:  

Go back to the old training, and know that once a student graduates, they are prepared to do the job of a bedside RN from the get-go.  Offer these programs free, to anyone who qualifies and find a way to do a lot of the coursework remotely, so a student can do much of their training while at home. Set up satellite classrooms remote from the nursing school.  Organize housing for students when they need to be away from home for in-hospital nursing training.  Also, attract them with the promise of an excellent position and salary and potential for advancement when they graduate.  Employers can then offer tuition reimbursement for nurses who want to work for them while they pursue higher education, like a BSN, MS or PhD.  While they continue their nursing education, they can be an already "trained" RN, earning a living in a hospital or LTC. We also need nurse educators, so additional education is necessary for that as well.  I know that some of "my" ideas are not original and that some facilities and schools offer a lot of what I suggest.  But this has to be widespread and the commonly accepted approach to nursing recruitment, education and retainment.  If schools and facilities and other nurses do not make nursing attractive, we will not get new nurses. 

The work of an RN should be based on caring, curing, rehabilitating (when possible), educating and prevention.  Another very important part of nursing is guiding patients and their families through their last days.  None of these things can be done in a hurry, yet every time a nurse goes to work at the bedside, whatever facility they work in, they face a rapid-fire marathon of work.  There is little or no time for actual caring....a little hand-holding, a compassionate conversation with a patient or family member,  an extra touch,  maybe even a little skincare. And, the nurses' basic needs like using the bathroom or having lunch are often not met.  That is just not right.  The job is just that...a job. We want it to be a calling again.

Nothing has highlighted the short fallings more than the care of Covid patients during an overwhelming pandemic.   We can't allow this to continue.  Nursing is not the same as a production line, yet nurses are expected to work that way.  It is evident by the long-standing understaffing of facilities where physical and mental speed is a constant expectation...and slowing down for caring and compassion is not. Profits are the ruling factor in healthcare facilities and that is just counterintuitive to the calling.

We will never attract young people to nursing if we allow the current pace and disrespect of nursing to stand.  There are just too many other attractive professional opportunities that compete with nursing.  But we can change.  We can change how or if we have to pay for nursing education.  We can change nursing education itself....by starting with "training" and continuing with broader advanced education. Perhaps even earlier nurses training prep can start in high school   We can change the work of nurses.  Most importantly, we can change the quality of the work and patient care and safety if all of these steps are taken.

 I don't have a miraculous way to pay for all of this, but we need to find a way. If not, then people like me, a 73-year-old woman, will be hard put to find nursing care for ourselves when we need it.

Specializes in Med-Surg, Trauma, Ortho, Neuro, Cardiac.
37 minutes ago, subee said:

Isn't is silly of hospitals not o offer a choice?  I did work one place where both options are offered.  

The initial idea was that it cut down on incidental overtime.  People that were scheduled to work 40 hours routinely worked over 40 hours just to get things done.  The other thing it was the preference of the majority of the staff.  The problem with offering 8 hours and 12 hours if you have to have someone to match the 8 hour people three times a day and someone to match the 12 hour person.  Otherwise at 3, 7 and 11 you're shuffling assignments around because not enough people want to work 8 hour shifts.  Easier I suppose for administration to have everyone on the same page.  But I can see that in this time of shortage, maybe offering 8 hours would be an incentive.  

 

Specializes in Patient Safety Advocate; HAI Prevention.

#s 4 and 6 could absolutely contribute to local nursing shortages, but as you say, perhaps not to a national nursing shortage.  When people leave YOUR hospital and are not replaced, that leaves you in a shortage, locally.

Specializes in Med-Surg, NICU.
12 hours ago, CathyGubersky said:

Tweety, Your last paragraph says it all, so why not try 8 hour shifts again????

 

Working 5 days, 40 hours per week would make the burn out FAR worse than only working 3 days, 36 hours per week.

If they forced bedside nurses to work two more days and four more hours per week, acute care would collapse.

Specializes in Med-Surg, NICU.
12 hours ago, CathyGubersky said:

Team Nursing "back in the day" was made up of RN Team Lead, LPN, 2 or 3 CNA's. The team assignment was based on acuity of patients on the floor.  Today's patients ARE much higher acuity, so that would be factored in to the assignment and safety ratio. The hospitals need to suck it up and hire more supporting staff. The RN can not do it all! If more hospitals paid off the school debt of the nurse as part of the hiring contract, and a good wage with at least 4 weeks mandatory PTO, and a lot of "support" staff There would be less burnout. I am still a firm believer in 8 hours a day on high alert is enough. 

Thanks for being a nurse, and for the work you do!

Cathy

Or they could hire more RNs and CNAs and pay them what we are worth.

Hiring LPNs in acute care is not helping RNs...it just creates a bigger burden and increase nurse to patient ratios. 

I think you also need to speak to today's nurses before asserting that we need to go back to 8s. I was attracted to the field because I could get four days off per week. If I had to do 5 8s, I would rather work in an office or another field entirely far away from the dumpster fire that is nursing. Much rather work in the library in peace than in chaos at the hospital if I had to be somewhere 5 days per week.

Also, by forcing us to work 5 days a week you are essentially stealing 104 days off of us...that little 4 weeks of PTO would not be enough to offset the loss of 104 free days per year.

Specializes in Geriatrics, Dialysis.

I have worked with a couple of old school diploma nurses and they ran circles around the BSN nurses. That kind of hands on education worked!

While the old diploma programs definitely graduated nurses ready to hit the floor running it went the way of the dodo and I'm sure it's never coming back.

I can't imagine too many modern students would be willing to live on site in a dorm setting and follow those strict rules not only about nursing but about their lifestyle that pretty much equated to living like a nun during their schooling and afterwards as a nurse.  Not to mention the crazy time commitment. Sure, the program was typically three years but there was very little down time in those three years. The nursing student, pretty much a guarantee that student is a woman by the way, lived and breathed nothing but that program the whole time. Maybe they'd get home for a short time for Christmas with their family but that's about it. Nothing but school and learning not only how to be a nurse but how to behave in an acceptable manner? No thanks! 

Specializes in Patient Safety Advocate; HAI Prevention.

What I suggested in my article was to bring the goals and successes of the 3 year diploma program back, not necessarily the route to get there.  You are absolutely right...not many modern students would accept the rigors of being under the strict rule of Catholic nuns and/or instructors and schooling.  We were under the rule...we had to observe dorm rules as well, like we were only allowed so many "privileges" per month...so many 10pm returns to the dorm and so many 12am privileges.  We were allowed unlimited weekend overnights.  These rules were enforced and documented by the dorm mother.  Academic rules were also in place....if you failed a single course, you were dismissed from the program.  We deferred to the doctors...always.  If we needed our seat to do charting, we still had to give it up if a doctor came into our space.  Those rules are obsolete, and new ways have prevailed.  We would have to do this intense but effective program without sexist and archaic rules...and I think a modern team could figure that out.  Some of the program could be done from home virtually, particularly the book studies.  Hands on, which is essential in nursing training must be at a facility.  All I know is that too many of the new nurses coming out of 4 year programs especially (and some ADN programs as well)...are not prepared for the actual work of a bedside nurse.  Plus, they are strapped with awful student debt.  That is just not right.

Specializes in oncology.
53 minutes ago, ThePrincessBride said:

Working 5 days, 40 hours per week would make the burn out FAR worse than only working 3 days, 36 hours per week.

If they forced bedside nurses to work two more days and four more hours per week, acute care would collapse.

I am assuming you never worked 8 hour shifts. How did we ever get along before 12 hour shifts came along??? Acute care did not collapse, rather it thrived. RN's did not say to a patient "I haven't been here for a while". And patients would see the same RN for several days and discharge plans were made..  

I am also assuming you were never a patient in a hospital (or a relation of someone in the hospital).... if not you will find out happens when nursing is so fractured. . Continuity of care is so important. 

Specializes in Med-Surg, NICU.
29 minutes ago, londonflo said:

I am assuming you never worked 8 hour shifts. How did we ever get along before 12 hour shifts came along??? Acute care did not collapse, rather it thrived. RN's did not say to a patient "I haven't been here for a while". And patients would see the same RN for several days and discharge plans were made..  

I am also assuming you were never a patient in a hospital (or a relation of someone in the hospital).... if not you will find out happens when nursing is so fractured. . Continuity of care is so important. 

Most nurses do not want to go back to 5 days a week, not with the conditions of the hospital today.

And yes, I have been a patient in a hospital and I did not care who took care of me, just as long as I received good care. Continuity of care is worse with having three nurses a day versus 2.

Also, the average patient stay is nowhere near as long as it was back then, outside of critical care/step down. 

Specializes in oncology.
53 minutes ago, ThePrincessBride said:

Most nurses do not want to go back to 5 days a week,

 And you are speaking for all of them. We lost a lot of RNs when the hospital went from 8 to 12 hour shifts. Female and male nurses wanted to be home for their children when they got out of school. I have  experienced more 'burn out' with the 3 12 hours. When I have been on  12 hour days, tempers get shorter at about 4 PM. 

 

53 minutes ago, ThePrincessBride said:

Continuity of care is worse with having three nurses a day versus 2.

No, I was referring to discharge planning and patient education. That is continuity of care.  It is called planning ahead. which is not always done when the RN will not be back for a week after the conclusion of their 3 days. .....Teaching about medications, adjustments to the home for promoting mobility, getting the supplies for dressing changes in the home, etc.  You just don't get it, do you?

Specializes in oncology.
On 5/20/2022 at 9:22 PM, ThePrincessBride said:

So instead of being responsible for 5 patients (which I would prefer), the RN will be forced to look after 10 and hope and pray to God they have an LPN that won't kill a patient

The skill needed is "verbal communication". When different levels of care work together, the patient benefits! 

15 hours ago, KathyDay said:

Working 8 hours, five days per week, meant you worked with the same people and got to know their strengths and weaknesses so you could work together.

And camaraderie!

Specializes in Med-Surg, NICU.
On 5/22/2022 at 1:24 PM, londonflo said:

 And you are speaking for all of them. We lost a lot of RNs when the hospital went from 8 to 12 hour shifts. Female and male nurses wanted to be home for their children when they got out of school. I have  experienced more 'burn out' with the 3 12 hours. When I have been on  12 hour days, tempers get shorter at about 4 PM. 

No, I was referring to discharge planning and patient education. That is continuity of care.  It is called planning ahead. which is not always done when the RN will not be back for a week after the conclusion of their 3 days. .....Teaching about medications, adjustments to the home for promoting mobility, getting the supplies for dressing changes in the home, etc.  You just don't get it, do you?

Tone down your condescension. You will win more with honey than vinegar. 

Allnurses and reddit have done numerous polls over the years, and by far, floor nurses prefer 4 days off vs 2 days off per week. We even have some old-timers who would rather retire than go back to 8s.

Many new nurses are looking for work-life balance. Guess which schedule provides more flexibility? The new nurses are the future and the quickest way to lose them would be to force them to work more hours, more days.

Additionally,  it is very apparent you are not working in today's acute care especially if you think a med surg nurse with 7 or 8 patients is spending enough time to do any meaningful education with patients, I think you are delusional. Social workers and case managers perform much of discharge planning and coordination. 

Specializes in Med-Surg, NICU.
23 minutes ago, londonflo said:

The skill needed is "verbal communication". When different levels of care work together, the patient benefits! 

And camaraderie!

Yeah, you don't work acute care if you don't think that RNs won't get screwed over by adding LPNs and doubling their ratios.

Signed,

A MODERN DAY nurse living in the PRESENT