Let's stop counting on charity to pay medical bills

Nurses Activism

Published

http://www.contracostatimes.com/search/ci_11356013?IADID=Search-www.contracostatimes.com-www.contracostatimes.com

Readers Forum: Let's stop counting on charity to pay medical bills

By Rose Ann DeMoro

Guest Commentary

Updated: 01/02/2009 05:05:10 PM PST

THE MOST heartbreaking e-mail alert that crossed my computer screen this holiday season came from a union which has set up a fund for medical benefits for widows and orphans of their former members.

Reliance on charity rather than a public safety net symbolizes what has become a perversely unique American solution to social problems, especially in the Bush administration era.

In "Critical Condition," a searing 2006 indictment of the collapse of our medical system, Donald Barlett and James Steele described how pervasive this dependence has become.

Garage sales, spaghetti feeds, livestock auctions, pancake breakfasts, walkathons, bingo tournaments, pie socials, car washes, church suppers, raffles, barbecues, basketball shootouts, even hot-air balloon rides, all to help families drowning with unpayable medical bills.

Rather than a coordinated national system, as every other industrialized country has established, our go-it-alone, you're-on-your-own society has hit rock bottom in the most basic area of all, the care of our communities.

No wonder the U.S. ranks last among comparable nations in preventable deaths and first in out-of-pocket costs, despite spending twice as much as anyone else on per-capita health care.

Much has been said about Franklin Roosevelt's first 100 days, a period that inaugurated a new standard of social action and set the stage for some of the most important reforms in American history.

It's also worth remembering FDR's 1944 call for a second Bill of Rights, which included the right for all Americans to quality health care and other basics in jobs, education, housing and food that he said "spell security."

Counting on personal check writers or online donors certainly relieves others of their responsibility, most notably the insurance companies who loathe to jeopardize their wealth by starting to actually pay for medical care.

It circumvents the vision of those who think our government should guarantee health care for all of us, much as government already assumes a duty for our police, fire, armed services, schools, libraries, mail service, parks, environmental protections, airport security, national museums and prisons.

Indeed, the government is already in the game of financing or providing medical care for seniors, veterans, the disabled and low-income families, and does it with less administrative waste, less bureaucracy and without rejecting people based on pre-existing conditions or dumping them when they get sick.

But, somehow, a whole lineup of liberal advocacy groups, policy wonks, media pundits and politicians have concluded there is a national "consensus" to fix this broken and dysfunctional health care system by expanding the private insurance system that created the disaster.

That approach, however, would not curtail skyrocketing premiums, deductibles, co-pays, or bills for care denied by the insurance companies.

Perhaps those "consensus" builders are counting on the pancake breakfasts' and orphans' funds to make up for their policy failure.

Or instead, they could channel that giving spirit into the growing campaign for real reform.

Registered nurses will be in the forefront of this movement and nurses know what it would take to guarantee high-quality care for everyone-a streamlined, more effective system than our current nightmare, based on care not insurance, by expanding and extending Medicare to cover everyone.

In an era when our government has already intervened on behalf of Citigroup and AIG and Freddy and Fannie and all those other financial wizards on Wall Street, maybe we can bailout the tens of millions of Americans without having to count on livestock auctions or widows' funds to pay for medical care.

DeMoro is executive director of the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee and a vice president of the AFL-CIO and a resident of Contra Costa County.

The U.S. is not "incapable" of implementing government mandated, taxpayer funded health care. Its people are unwilling to do so, as evidenced by the lack of support for such initiatives by the majority of our voters and our elected officials.

There was also a lack of initiative by many voters initially for things such as civil and gay rights. This proves nothing, and the tide is turning in vast favor of UHC.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/01/opinion/polls/main2528357.shtml

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/washington/01cnd-poll.html

I have no interest in continuing a discussion in which other posters claim opinions as facts
Please provide evidence of this occuring.

express disinterest in reading information I have offered to support my viewpoint.
.. no thank you.

All i am asking of you (or any opponent of UHC) is to simply provide evidence of your claims. This is not difficult. You are the ones saying UHC would not work. The burden of proof is on you.

Specializes in Community, OB, Nursery.

Please remember in the course of this debate to not attack other members personally. I am seeing a bit of it here and wish it were not so. I happen to have strong opinions about this topic as much as anyone, so I understand the passions. But please, no attacking one another.

Specializes in Telemetry & Obs.
Please remember in the course of this debate to not attack other members personally. I am seeing a bit of it here and wish it were not so. I happen to have strong opinions about this topic as much as anyone, so I understand the passions. But please, no attacking one another.

Whew!! Thank you! As much as I love a good "debate" this was hardly one. :(

Specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner.

Your right, forget about charity, it is a bad idea. Lets have the government take care of everything.

Your right, forget about charity, it is a bad idea. Lets have the government take care of everything.

Who said anything about that?

Specializes in Med Surg, Tele, PH, CM.

[

It's immoral to continue to subsidize insurers. Mandates to purchase insurance are wrong because they've failed to control costs and expand coverage every time they've been tried. How much longer will we allow the pain and suffering and death from preventable illness continue when we know there is a solution?

Who do you think is going to be doing all the work for Universal Healthcare? The Federal Government is not going to get into the business of being healthcare provider. They don't do it now, CMMS is primarily a policy-making agency for Medicare/Medicaid. The actual hands-on administration is done through outsourcing, like with BCBS. They will do the same for universal healthcare, and will turn to the organizations who are doing the work now. The profits won't be as high, but no one at these insurance companies will starve.

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.
[

It's immoral to continue to subsidize insurers. Mandates to purchase insurance are wrong because they've failed to control costs and expand coverage every time they've been tried. How much longer will we allow the pain and suffering and death from preventable illness continue when we know there is a solution?

Who do you think is going to be doing all the work for Universal Healthcare? The Federal Government is not going to get into the business of being healthcare provider. They don't do it now, CMMS is primarily a policy-making agency for Medicare/Medicaid. The actual hands-on administration is done through outsourcing, like with BCBS. They will do the same for universal healthcare, and will turn to the organizations who are doing the work now. The profits won't be as high, but no one at these insurance companies will starve.

Maybe some of them will retrain in health professions. Some may become nurses.

+ Add a Comment