Published
What is more disgusting is that on March 2, 2014, she took a video of a nurse cleaning an incapcitated patient's GI blood clot. She then sent the video to the other nurse's phone. The video showed the patient's rectum.
She took a picture of an incapacitated male patient's genitals on August 4.
She continued to work for 5 months after at least 1 other nurse knew she had videoed a patient's rectum.
Either the other nurse didn't report it, or the facility did nothing. Either one is abhorrent.
What is more disgusting is that on March 2, 2014, she took a video of a nurse cleaning an incapcitated patient's GI blood clot. She then sent the video to the other nurse's phone. The video showed the patient's rectum.She took a picture of an incapacitated male patient's genitals on August 4.
She continued to work for 5 months after at least 1 other nurse knew she had videoed a patient's rectum.
Either the other nurse didn't report it, or the facility did nothing. Either one is abhorrent.
What she did was absolutely despicable and she should definitely lose her license. However, why does the article give her address? What's the point of that?
Penelope_Pitstop, BSN, RN
2,369 Posts
Upstate New York nurse convicted of taking picture of patient's member surrenders license | New York's PIX11 / WPIX-TV
"Johnson also used her iPhone to take a video of another nurse cleaning an incapacitated female patient's gastrointestinal blood clot." - does this mean lower GI bleed???
Regardless...