Just curious as to how others are handling this scenario....
I work on a very busy tele unit in a large teaching hospital. My guess is it's a typical tele unit, high turnover rates b/c of higher levels of acuity with higher patient ratios than ICU. Many of our patients end up having to transferred to the unit b/c of change in status, or they were moved out of the unit before they were ready in order to free up beds and have to be sent back. We often work short staffed due to these issues.
Anyway, long story short, last night I had a patient experiencing respiratory distress and I worked with him for about an hour pushing lasix, getting resp tx's, stat xray, ABG, getting MD to come up and eval, twice. I ended up transferring him to the unit and b/c he was one on one for so long, I was way behind with my other patients. Of course this happened right after shift change, so i was left scrambling to pass meds, assess and chart. Everyone was busy b/c we were working short with no tech, but a short time later, the charge nurse gave me a new admission b/c I now had one less patient than everyone else so my number was up. This happens all the time on my floor. I saw that other nurses were sitting down to chart, basically caught up and I, who had been slammed since shift change and was now playing catch up, had to take a new admission just to make the numbers on the assignment board "fair" b/c I was down by one patient after my transfer. Is is better to assign a new admission to another nurse who is not struggling but will end up having an extra patient , or is is better to assign to a nurse who is slammed, but the ratio will be even? It is sometimes obvious to me that the workload is the same or even more for nurses with less patients but my floor doesn't really take this into consideration. Has anyone come up with a system for assigning that works better without slamming a nurse who's down and not making the other nurses feel dumped on by having to take on a higher number patients?