Five Ways to Convince Patients they Need Flu Shots

Nurses should never force patients to take any treatment, but sometimes we have to be a bit more persuasive in our approach to a particular procedure. One such treatment is the flu shot, and there are several myths and fears surrounding this vaccine. Helping your patient understand the importance of the flu shot can go a long way to making them healthier. Nurses Announcements Archive Article

Patients, especially chronically ill patients, need flu shots, but many in the general public have an open distrust for this vital vaccine. In fact, some people reject all vaccines, and that's a different issue entirely. Flu shots are still important, and some members of the public take a little convincing to get them to accept the shot. There are a great deal of myths and misconceptions about this shot, and some patients believe the hype.

As nurses, we have to try to do what's best for the patient, and sometimes that means educating about those myths. Of course, we could never force someone to take a shot that they are dead set against, but the persuasion of education may be enough to allow them to see that the need for the shot. If you come up against a patient who is chronically ill that refuses a shot, here are a few strategies to combat the myths they may believe.

Explain How Flu Shots are Created

Some patients do not understand exactly what the flu shot is, and this can lead to distrust and refusal. It helps to explain to them that it is an amalgamation of the various flu strains thought to be active for the coming season. You can also use this information to help explain why the shot needs to be performed every year. The flu strains change, and the new vaccine differs every year.

It helps to explain the flu and get patients to understand that it can knock them out for weeks. Emphasizing that the people in charge of creating the vaccine make it as safe as possible, but it isn't a guarantee against getting the flu. Some strains pop up every year that can infect even patients who have gotten the shot. Once this is explained, some patients are more open to the idea of getting a flu shot.

Emphasize Safety of Flu Shots

Flu shots are generally considered safe. You can use this information to educate the patient that they are better off with it than without it. Of course, there is often local irritation where the shot is administered, but most people don't tend to have reactions to the shot itself. The vaccine is rigorously tested for safety, and the possibility of a reaction is minimal.

You may also find patients who are afraid of getting a shot. It helps to explain that the shot only hurts for a minute, though they may have soreness later. The shot goes into the deltoid, an IM shot, and these are usually more painful than others. Explain that they will feel some discomfort at first, but it quickly goes away. Usually, the benefits of the flu shot are far more important than the momentary pain that some patients experience.

Assure Them They Won't Get the Flu from the Shot

One of the most prevalent myths about the flu shot is that it gives you the flu. This keeps more patients away from the shot than any other excuse. It is your job to explain to them that the preparation is a dead one. This means that the virus isn't active and helps the immune system recognize and destroy the virus when it comes around to infect.

Some patients do get the flu after a flu shot, but this is usually because they were already infected when they got the shot. In this case, it is difficult to convince the patient that the shot didn't lead to their symptoms. If you were the patient, you would have a hard time believing it, too. Tell the patient that getting the shot as early in the season as possible will prevent this phenomenon, but it is still possible.

Educate about Symptoms of Flu

Those who refuse the flu shot should be told the symptoms for several reasons. First, it is more likely that they can get the flu without the shot, and they should know what to look for in case they do become infected. Second, they may decide to have the shot once they realize how miserable it is to actually have the flu. The public is not usually educated about the signs and symptoms of the flu, and they may change their mind once they know.

You should tell them to watch for high fever, over 101 degrees F. The symptoms of the flu often are confused with that of the common cold. Stuffy head, congested chest, and muscle aches are all common symptoms. The difference is that the flu is generally more severe and lasts for a longer time. While the cold can last for a few days, the flu can linger for weeks, and this can cause inconvenience and health problems for the patient.

Explain the Complications of Flu

Healthy people do not usually suffer complications of the flu. Yes, they are miserable, can't go to work, and generally inconvenienced, but it doesn't descend into a medical crisis. This isn't true for those who are very young, very old or have a chronic disease. The immune system in these patients is not generally as robust, and this means that the flu can take hold and lead to further problems.

The most common problem that arises from the flu is the manifestation of pneumonia. In those with a compromised respiratory system, pneumonia can lead to a stay in the hospital and possibly a trip to the ICU. Even those with diabetes are at risk for the condition developing into pneumonia because of the general decrease in immune function due to high blood sugars. For the very young and the very old, pneumonia can be devastating and particularly hard to treat. Explaining these complications can help to convince even the most recalcitrant patient to accept the vaccination.

Specializes in ER.

Some random thoughts . . . .

Earlier this year there was a flu outbreak on a Navy ship, USS Ardent, even though it was 100% vaccinated crew on board. The outbreak was sufficient to disable the ship for several days, fortunately it was in safe waters at the time.

The NVAC, National Vaccine Advisory Board that advise the CDC is made up primarily of representatives of the major pharmaceutical companies that market the flu shot. There are no nurses on this board.

Healthcare staff forced to get the shot are still expected to sign a "consent". Most I know delete the word 'consent' and write "coercion".

There is absolutely no evidence that the shot is effective. In Europe its mostly the over 75s that have it, and there are no problems there.

Those that wish to put viral DNA's into them, by all means let them do it! There are enough idiots on this planet that will blindly trust “statistics” and go ahead anyway.

Just curious -- are you old enough to remember polio? If not, have you read about it? Do you think that there should have been no polio vaccines?

I'm not a health professional, but as a child I wanted to be a nurse, so I remember photos of the "iron lung" and kids using crutches and braces to walk. I remember the sheer terror of my mother -- of course she tried to conceal it, but everyone was so frightened. You couldn't miss the moms discussing polio in hushed tones.

As an adult, I have read the history and I know there have been serious problems associated with polio vaccine at times. I had just gotten vaccinated when the Cutter Incident was announced (didn't affect me).

Nonetheless, even with problems and a few very bad outcomes, I think we are better off now than we were before polio was eradicated in most of the world.

I always raise this issue with anti-vax people and have never gotten much of a response.

Specializes in Med/Surg, Academics.

This year's flu shot strains were not the "right" ones for the flu that is currently circulating (flu A H3N2, mutated from vaccine strain). We all know how the flu shot strains are decided and that it is a best guess. Yes, it will make educating our patients a little more difficult in coming flu seasons, but we also know that the flu is a killer for many patients with health problems, and it can knock a healthy person out for weeks.

For or those who are vehemently against the flu shot, what are your reasons. Any medical claims need to be backed up with statistics. It would also help me to know if you've taken care of people with the flu in your workplace. (This time of year, we have a LOT of patients with the flu, with SOB, activity intolerance, general malaise, and, in some cases, sepsis.) I'm still trying to understand why healthcare workers are against it.

Specializes in Long Term Acute Care, TCU.

The argument is simple:

The polio vaccine developed in 1952 by Jonas Salk (who also helped to develop the flu vaccine) has virtually eradicated polio.

The flu vaccine, developed in 1938, has done nothing to eradicate influenza. If it worked, then everyone would get the shot.

Specializes in Long Term Acute Care, TCU.

Let me clarify: Afghanistan, India, Nigeria, and Pakistan still have polio outbreaks.

The USA does not.

The argument is simple:

The polio vaccine developed in 1952 by Jonas Salk (who also helped to develop the flu vaccine) has virtually eradicated polio.

The flu vaccine, developed in 1938, has done nothing to eradicate influenza. If it worked, then everyone would get the shot.

Wait, what? So vaccines are useless if they don't totally (or largely) eliminate the disease globally?

My definition of flu vaccine "working" is this: it reduces the likelihood of my being infected by the strains of flu the vaccine covers.

As I understand it, the flu virus mutates so it is impossible to predict precisely what strains I might encounter. So when I get the vaccine, I am improving the odds of my having a healthy winter. I am not getting (or expecting) a guarantee.

Isn't "improving the odds" what a lot of health measures do?

Specializes in ER.

Where i work, the highest rate of sickness leave is due to reactions to the flu shot. Staffing is decimated right now and quite a few have been hospitalized due to severe reactions.

I never saw this when working in Europe. I have no problem with proven vaccines, for polio, hep, etc, but this seems to me to be a pointless exercise.

Lynda for what it is worth. I enjoyed your article and your post. You are a very smart women. There is nothing wrong with educating patients about both the risks and benefits of any vaccine. The flu vaccine does more good than harm. It is a shame others do not see that.

Specializes in Long Term Acute Care, TCU.

"Current evidence supporting the effectiveness of influenza vaccine in preventing hospitalizations in older adults is insufficient": Effectiveness of seasonal vaccine in preventing confirmed influenza... - PubMed - NCBI

90% of deaths are in people greater than 65 years of age: Seasonal Flu Vaccine

"Influenza vaccines can provide moderate protection against virologically confirmed influenza, but such protection is greatly reduced or absent in some seasons. Evidence for protection in adults aged 65 years or older is lacking. LAIVs consistently show highest efficacy in young children (aged 6 months to 7 years). New vaccines with improved clinical efficacy and effectiveness are needed to further reduce influenza-related morbidity and mortality":Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic revi... - PubMed - NCBI

The problem with this stance is that you are putting your patients at risk. You can carry and pass on the flu virus for days without having symptoms yet.

if you are exposed to the flu virus, with or without the vaccine, you can spread it.

Unfortunately, statistics and studies are all we have. Are we supposed to disbelieve that saturated fats lead to heart attacks because those conducting the studies stood to gain by the sale of low fat foods and heart surgery?

No.

I have yet to see a study or statistic sited that proves all of these horrible things about the flu shot. That is reprehensible for a site that will influence whether a nurse educates a patient correctly about something that could be helpful.

You don't like the CDC? Cool. Cite studies that back up your opinions from another source. Europe has all the answers? What answers do they have? Your being vague to make your point and not citing specifics.

If you don't trust the CDC, that's fine, but many people do. Not telling your patients the facts from an objective point of view is dangerous. Many lives HAVE been saved by this vaccine. Do I think they go overboard? Yeah. I don't agree with the CDC guidelines.

However, I'm not going to let my opinion of spurious "facts" influence what I tell a patient. They have the right to make that decision themselves, and until you can point to studies enumerating the so called evils of flu shots, your point is essentially weakened.

the latest study says that carbs and not saturated fats are the bad guy.... and so it goes.

the latest study says that carbs and not saturated fats are the bad guy.... and so it goes.

Just to side track more and add another monkey wrench, neither are really a problem unless your body is in an inflamed state. So it's not so much either. Rather it's eating a pro-inflammatory diet.

KO