Evidence-Based Practice by Nurses for Nurses: Encouraging Waiting Spontaneous Labor

This article describes an evidence-based patient-centered campaign and clinical resources that were developed by nurses, for nurses. Evidence includes an older AHRQ systematic review combined with current and emerging evidence. The topic (early induction of labor) is a high priority across many disciplines and is a strong example of how evidence can stimulate and inform changes in practice that are entrenched routines (you know the refrain -- "because we've always done it that way."). We hope you enjoy this new posting and explore the embedded links to the evidence-based materials.

Sponsored Content

Keeping women healthy during pregnancy and childbirth is critical not only to the health of the baby but also for the woman's lifelong health. Complications sustained during childbirth, including complications of cesarean birth, can negatively impact a woman's mental and physical health in the immediate postpartum period and in the long-term. Her newborn can be affected as complications can negatively affect breastfeeding, a woman's energy and her adjustment to parenting. A focus area of heightened attention in maternity care has been elective, or non-medically indicated, induction of labor because evidence shows this practice results in higher rates of cesarean for women who have induction of labor with their first pregnancy and/or with an unripe cervix.

NOTE: Since this article references materials not developed by AHRQ, we must note that the findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Evaluating evidence for obstetric practices is complicated because practices, such as induction of labor without medical indications, began when there was less of an emphasis on an evidence basis for practice therefore the risks were not fully known or understood. The practice of elective inductions became culturally-accepted and widely used in obstetrical care. The practice paradigm is shifting away from elective inductions however many women are still expecting to have a non-medically indicated induction for convenience of family and work life. Women need to know the risks of elective inductions for themselves and their baby so they can make an informed decision about their birth choices.

Explaining the evidence behind culturally-accepted practices can be hard. Nurses are ideally suited to discuss the safety and harms of non-medically indicated induction of labor with their patients and also friends, family and their communities. No other group of professionals has such an intimate knowledge of the effects of induction on mothers and babies because nurses are responsible for the bedside monitoring of the high-alert medication oxytocin, which is used for most inductions. That's why the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN) developed their public health campaign, Don't Rush Me--Go the Full 40, which gives women and nurses 40 reasons to wait for labor to start on its own when pregnancy is healthy. The reasons address what emerging evidence demonstrates regarding healthy labor and birth practices, such as:

  • Reason #3: Let nature take over--there are fewer complications and risks for both you and baby through natural birth
  • Reason #15: Give baby's development the benefit of time since you may not know exactly when you got pregnant
  • Reason #21: Ignore people who say an induction is more convenient. Nothing is convenient about a longer labor and increasing your risk of cesarean

The benefits of waiting for spontaneous labor and normal birth are well documented and result in giving mom and her baby the best possible start toward bonding, breastfeeding and recovery from labor and birth. Nurses can use the 40 Reasons article of the campaign (English & Spanish) to lead evidence-based, patient-centric discussions with women about the risks of elective induction of labor. Nurses can download a Go The Full 40 toolkit to share with their colleagues and patients, and engage with the Go The Full 40 Champions group, which advocates waiting for spontaneous labor when all is well in pregnancy.

Evidence has identified the risks and complications of administering exogenous hormones such as synthetic oxytocin to a woman and her baby to induce labor. An equally importance evidence question yet to be answered is what short and long term benefits do women and babies receive from the powerful natural hormones of spontaneous labor and birth?

Lynn Erdman, MN, RN, FAAN

AWHONN, Chief Executive Officer

I saw the whole clip this morning. While I appreciate all that Boomer does for CF, I've totally lost respect for him over his statements.

Specializes in Nurse Educator; Family Nursing.

Oh, my, such neanderthals. The risk of severe respiratory complications after C/S are 5 times higher for the newborn, and elective primary C/S is known to increase the risk of placenta acreta necessitating a C/S-hysterectomy (rate is 1:1000). These two men should limit their comments to something they know something about (sports) not choices. Their values are upside down putting job over family.

Specializes in Nurse Educator; Family Nursing.

What does this have to do with our discussion about C/S???

Specializes in Pediatrics, Emergency, Trauma.
What does this have to do with our discussion about C/S???

It's spam....

Specializes in Nurse Educator; Family Nursing.

Thanks. . .appreciate the response. . .

These are people who think sports is the most important thing in life. What can you say? Typical self-absorbed old men. Smart young women in this day and age do not put up with garbage like women of my age and older. SVD is better for mom and baby in most cases, unless there is a legitimate medical reason. So sad that these idiots even get an audience when they say this stupid stuff.

Great Article!!! Thanks!

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

BOOMER ESIASON? We are supposed to take our cue from people like him? Don't think so. I hate when misinformed celebs make medical statements, anyhow. They have the right to spew their silliness, but sadly, some people out there really do take their cue from their example and words. And if taking time off from work (whatever work it is) is considered inconvenient, what the HECK is parenting gonna do? It's time people learn that right from the start. That is, babies come when it is best for them in the majority of cases, and the time after birth is much more enduring as well as challenging. Childbirth is just the beginning.

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

PS I truly admire Daniel Murphy's decision to step up to the plate from the get-go by insisting on time with his wife/child during such an important occasion (that would be birth). GOOD FOR HIM. HE is a great example, one I hope many more partners follow suit doing. What a man.