Published
Everybody underestimates blood loss. Multiple studies have been done on this and it seems every time the practitioner is way off on the actual loss. Here is one study on midwives and physicians.
Glover P. Blood loss at delivery: how accurate is your estimation? Aust J Midwifery. 2003;2;21-24.
EBL = estimated blood loss
PPH = post partum hemorrhage
our docs do that all the time......
I was in a c section where they soaked about 45 laps and called the EBL 300mL.....the suction canister had about 800 mL in it! (i know that some of the fluid in the canister was irrigation fluid and amniotic fluid but patient was being sectioned for fetal intolerance to labor due to oligo)..... Hmmmmmm......
I had PPH after delivering my DD last year....read the 'birth report' and EBL was 1100cc - I didn't receive a blood transfusion- I'm not sure what my H&H was, but all I know is I passed out, don't remember much of the hours following the birth. But I've always been curious - in OB RN opinion, how severe of PPH is that considered? Dr. didn't act like it was that big of deal....
p.s. disclaimer...not asking medical advice just nursing opinion!
Elvish, BSN, DNP, RN, NP
4 Articles; 5,259 Posts
I think some of ours do, although I can't prove it.
The other night when I had a PPH r/t retained frags, they came in & did a manual removal (mentioned in another thread -- no pain meds :angryfire ). After all was said and done (and blood was everywhere), the EBL (of the PPH) was 300ml. Uh, I don't think so.
Not when a wad of clots almost the size of a volleyball comes out -- not including what we'd already expressed before they got there.
I should've weighed the chux to see how much blood there was. 300ml my big toe.