Published
Anyone else think the powers that be wasted a great opportunity with the DNP recommended curriculum? I seems to be mainly research focused, with little (if any) advanced clinical knowledge. What's the point? It would have been a wonderful way to increase the anemic clinical hours in NP programs (from 600ish to a more respectable 1500+). Thoughts?
That is a MAJOR issue. They all need to be created equal. Should be an accreditation
requirement.
Well it's fine it they meet requirements to take boards. I had twice as many cases as needed to sit for boards. What I am saying is that a DNP program does not necessarily make you more ready to work in your chosen field.
That is a MAJOR issue. They all need to be created equal. Should be an accreditationrequirement.
They all meet accreditation requirements, but just like the MSN each program can either do the minimum or alter whatever they like as long as it meets the minimum accreditation requirements.
I don't think it is good for all programs to be exactly the same. Complete homogeneity of programs would lead to a small amount of diversity in the graduates, and IMO overall substandard care.
I would like to see some dnp programs that emphasize the skills needed to be a better *clinician*. A year+ out from starting my first NP job, I would love to take courses in advanced diagostic reasoning, advanced patho and pharm that focus on even more specific disease states, etc. At this point, I know where the gaps in my knowledge are and would love to do some advanced coursework, without having to apply to medical school!
will garner some kind of respect?! There is no scheme involved. Pharmacists/PT/OT noted that they had increased their credit hours to a point that the hours did not match the degree. Now these healthcare professionals are getting a degree that correlates better to the amount of work they do in school. I don't know about where you work, but with the occasional exception of some chiropractors none of our non-physician/dentist/podiatry staff are using the title doctor when introducing themselves.By the way nurses are the most respected profession.http://www.angus-reid.com/wp-content...rofessions.pdf
I think anyone who has earned a doctoral degree of any sort deserves the title of Doctor. It's not exclusively MDs, though they seem to think it is...
I honestly see it as the difference between an ADN and a BSN. There is probably more opportunity. Also if someone else with an identical resume applies for the same job, one has an MSN, one has a DNP- the DNP will likely be given preference because of the higher education. That alone makes it not a waste.
I honestly see it as the difference between an ADN and a BSN. There is probably more opportunity. Also if someone else with an identical resume applies for the same job, one has an MSN, one has a DNP- the DNP will likely be given preference because of the higher education. That alone makes it not a waste.
I think a lot of depends on who is doing the hiring, if you are being hired by physician and there isn't a lot of DNPs/DNAPs in the area then they may see you as some kind of threat and not hire just based on the degree alone.
And some of those DNPs are extremely pricey. (Can you say, NYU???) I wonder how lengthy the payback time would be, even assuming a DNP would be given hiring preference. wtbcrna, I just happen to know someone who had the exact problem you mentioned. She got her DNP and the doc she worked for started making snide comments about how she must feel superior now, etc. This was a place she had worked for quite a while. He made her so miserable, she quit. I know that's just an anecdote and there is no way to predict how any one doc is going to react to a DNP. His loss, in my opinion. Why would you want to alienate a long-time NP?
I think it just shows the true opinion of that physician towards nurses/NPs. I think as the DNP/DNAP becomes more common it will be less of an issue.And some of those DNPs are extremely pricey. (Can you say, NYU???) I wonder how lengthy the payback time would be, even assuming a DNP would be given hiring preference. wtbcrna, I just happen to know someone who had the exact problem you mentioned. She got her DNP and the doc she worked for started making snide comments about how she must feel superior now, etc. This was a place she had worked for quite a while. He made her so miserable, she quit. I know that's just an anecdote and there is no way to predict how any one doc is going to react to a DNP. His loss, in my opinion. Why would you want to alienate a long-time NP?
I took a proactive approach when I started my DNAP. I had a meeting with our medical director and told him I was accepted to school for my DNAP, and that I was getting my clinical doctorate with a focus in education so I could teach and that in no way did it have any effect on my scope of practice. I think that stopped any problems in my department before they even started.
cruisin_woodward
329 Posts
That is a MAJOR issue. They all need to be created equal. Should be an accreditation
requirement.