Published
Yes, its still DKA, and the AG you calculated in not accurate, its 20 and not 14. The Pt has overcompensated by blowing off CO2. The bicarb is normally lower. Sounds like a Pt on day 2 or day three whose kideneys have responded and recovering bicarb gain. I like what the other nurse said about nausea and vomiting. Its a different metabolic process which is as simple as alkalosis due to H+ loss. When combined with a primary metabolic acidosis i can see how such a gas would cause confusion.
Thanks for posting.
Think about it this way: when your body compensates, the OTHER system kicks in. So, if the patient originally has metabolic acidosis, when the body starts compensating, you're going to see the respiratory system kick in to compensate. Yes, the pH is high, but BOTH PaCO2 & HCO3 are low. This tells you that it's partially compensated.
You have to look at ALL the S&Sx the pt is presenting, not just the ABGs. It's definitely confusing, when you're used to seeing DKA solely as metabolic acidosis. However, many patients don't come in until they're in really bad shape and they're already compensating. I had a DKA pt in clinicals who had similar labs. When I look at this person's ABGs, I did not expect it to look that way. My clinical instructor told me to think about it and figure out why the ABG would appear that way. Makes sense once you think through the compensation process :)
Alisonisayoshi, LVN
547 Posts
So I'm having a major confusion point on a case study. Here are the labs that are confusing me: pH 7.53, pco2 24.0, bicarb 19.8. BG of 628. Urine ketone +2, glucose +3. NA 146 Cl 106. I get an Anion gap of 14. Pts dx is DKA. This confuses me as this is an alkalosis. I understand that the anion gap is an indicator of DKA, but the labs say alkalosis. What am I missing?