Illinois is poised to adopt safe staffing ratios even as a hospital CEO publicly puts profits before patients. Mark Gridley, CEO of FHN Memorial, thinks fewer nurses are better and claims that Illinois already has optimal staffing levels of registered nurses.
Updated:
The fight for safe patient staffing is being waged right now in Illinois. The Safe Patient Limits Act, HB 2604, which calls for safe nurse-patient ratios, will be voted on this week in Springfield, Illinois in the House of Representatives.
The bill requires:
If it passes, Illinois will be on its way to joining California as the only state with mandated safe staffing (nurse-patient ratios).
It won’t pass if the American Hospital Association (AHA), hospital CEOs, and even the American Nurses Association (ANA) have their way. Doris Carroll, Vice President of the Illinois Nurses Association, flatly states that “Not one CEO (in Illinois) is in favor of the safe staffing legislation”.
It has a good chance of passing if Illinois nurses call their legislators (see below) today.
Mark Gridley, CEO of FHN Memorial Hospital, raised the ire of Illinois nurses in a public statement opposing the bill. He used predictable arguments and unsubstantiated claims that are intended to mislead nurses and the public.
The CEO, who says that he worked as an LPN prior to becoming a CEO, declared that “increasing the number of nurses won’t improve care”.
Does Mr. Gridley really believe that fewer nurses result in improved care? At what ratio does he determine that "more nurses won't improve care"? One nurse to six patients? One nurse to eight patients?
It has been proven over and over in the literature that lower ratios are associated with significantly lower mortality.
It is concerning that evidence can be ignored in lieu of sweeping statements. Especially when rhetoric is valued over evidence by a hospital CEO.
According to the Illinois Center for Nursing Workforce Survey, there were 176,974 registered nurses in Illinois in 2016.
According to the federal Health Services and Resources Administration (HRSA), an agency of the US Department of Health and Human Services, 139, 400 registered nurses will be needed in Illinois by 2030.
HRSA projects an overage of registered nurses in Illinois, yet the CEO of Fairhaven hospital claims that Illinois has an “anticipated shortage of 21,000 nurses in 2020”.
While different numbers and predictive models can be used to support different arguments, mandated safe staffing ratios in California not only improved staffing, it alleviated the severe nursing shortage at the time (Aiken,2010).
Mark Gridley then states that staff would have to be cut in other areas. This is intended to frighten nurses, and perhaps to serve as a veiled warning, but it is unfounded. HB 2604 specifically prohibits cutting staff.
Dall and colleagues (2009) determined that ” hospitals with greater nurse staffing levels resulted in cost savings due to reductions in hospital-acquired infections, shorter lengths of stay and improved productivity”.
Hospitals with a higher nurse-patient ratio that focus on retaining nurses have a competitive edge. Nurses report less burnout and job dissatisfaction when the quality of care is higher, as in hospitals with safe staffing ratios (Everhart, et al., 2013).
“Illinois already has laws...to ensure safe, optimum nurse staffing levels”, Mark Gridley.
Illinois nurses strongly disagree. Seven states, including Illinois, have legislation in place that requires hospitals to have staffing committees. Staffing committees are to include bedside nurses as well as management to create staffing plans specific to each unit. Staffing plans are to take into consideration:
It sounds good in theory, and theory is where it remains. According to the ANA-Illinois, over 70% of nurses say the staffing plans are not being used. Nurses say that staffing committee meetings lack accountability, are hijacked by management, are not taken seriously, and serve as lip service only.
Hospitals with staffing committees are free to staff 1 RN for every 6-7 Med Surg patients, or 8, or however many they see fit.
Ratios are not inflexible. On the contrary, nothing in the Safe Patient Limits Act precludes the use of patient acuity systems and nothing precludes a facility from assigning fewer patients that the Act requires.
As an example of how flexible ratios are, a Med Surg nurse in a mid-sized CA hospital who is assigned a patient with continuous bladder irrigation will only have 3 patients, even though ratios call for 5 patients. Ratios are not inflexible unless hospital administrators want them to be.
It would be interesting to know the staffing assignments at FHN Memorial, and for Mark Gridley to give examples of the staffing flexibility in his facility.
Critics say hospitals will close or reduce services.
Acquisitions, takeovers, mergers and closures are taking place in all of the 49 states that do not have mandated nurse-patient ratios. Hospitals all over the country have merged or closed due to decreased reimbursement and low patient volume, for example, a 25-bed hospital in Celine, TN, that recently closed on March 1, 2019.
According to Linda Aiken “There is no evidence that hospitals closed as a result of the legislation (in California). Indeed, there is very good scientific evidence that staffing improved even in safety-net hospitals that long had poor staffing.”
Consider this- if the surgery department had surgeries scheduled but didn’t have adequate nursing staff, should they cancel cases? The answer is yes. Only safe services should be provided.
Illinois nurses, the time to speak up is today. If you are reading this, call your legislator now. Leave a voicemail. You are a constituent, and your opinion matters.
The Illinois Who is your State Rep? Follow this link and enter your address information into this link: https://bit.ly/2FtE2A3.
Here is a script (thanks to Doris Carroll):
Hello Representative _________,
My name is ___________,
I have been a constituent in your district for ___ years. I’ve been a nurse for ___ years.
I am calling today to ask that you please vote Yes on the Safe Patient Limits act, House Bill 2604, which ensures that there is a maximum number of patients any one nurse can be assigned depending on her unit. Unsafe staffing costs patients their lives. Please put patients over profits. Please Vote Yes on HB 2604!
References
Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Cimiotti, J. P., Clarke, S. P., Flynn, L., Seago, J. A., ... & Smith, H. L. (2010). Implications of the California nurse staffing mandate for other states. Health services research, 45(4), 904-921.
Dall T, Chen Y, Seifert R, Maddox P, Hagan P. The economic value of professional nursing. Medical Care. 2009;47(1):97–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Everhart, D., Neff, D., Al-Amin, M., Nogle, J., & Weech-Maldonado, R. (2013). The effects of nurse staffing on hospital financial performance: Competitive versus less competitive markets. Health care management review, 38(2), 146.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (201) Supply and Demand Projections of the Nursing Workforce:2014-2030.
On 4/10/2019 at 4:31 PM, MacNinni123 said:Acuity should be the greatest determiner of staffing ratios. Experience is also extremely important. Therefore, the ratios can be different every day, every shift, and for every nurse. The nurse/patient ratio is a good start, but it sure takes more than that to keep patients...and nurses...safe. The CEO's opinion is useless. He simply is trying to keep his salary, benefits and bonuses way, way up there, while nurses and ancillary staff (of whom are becoming fewer and fewer) do the drudge work. The correct number of nurses per patients does save lives. Specialized care always does. And, that is what we should be giving. Nursing breaks (whenever one is fortunate enough to get one) are worrisome. The covering nurse and the combined patients are in danger during those times. We who have staffed the floors KNOW what truly happens. Is is frightening. Once, I was on Tele with 13 patients to care for. When I called the supervisor for help, she asked what I wanted her to do. I responded that I wanted her to help me. She turned her back on me and walked away. That was the straw for me. I quit, and went to work for an agency, doing pediatric home care. One little patient at a time.
Wow? What if you have numerous patients with acute cardiac issues at the same time? Never heard of such mess. Wow i literally gasped out loud reading that. When i have 6 tele patients im stressed much less 13.
2 hours ago, Snatchedwig said:Wow? What if you have numerous patients with acute cardiac issues at the same time? Never heard of such mess. Wow i literally gasped out loud reading that. When i have 6 tele patients im stressed much less 13.
In Illinois’ we DO have an Acuity Staffing law. For 10 yrs. We’d expect Acuity and Ratios to be the our perfect world.
7 hours ago, Lil Nel said:Okay. I get what you are saying.
However, I would be hard pressed to find 20 at my facility, who would be willing to step out and take action.
They are similar to triciaj's coworkers.
Willing to allow YOU to step out, but they themselves will cower in the corner.
It would be far easier, I think to organize nurses from around the state, to back legislation.
I was afraid you’d say that. It isn’t easy. 20 would be ideal. 10 would be doable. Just saying. ?
Well, well.
Tonight, we were handed a time study sheet to complete.
Management expects us to write down, how long it takes us to complete tasks for ALL of our patients.
The explanation actually said that they want to know what we do, during a shift.
Day shift was asked to do this too.
I wrote, that I felt the exercise was a waste of time, as it is nothing more than a small snapshot, of one night, and one shift.
I also included the 30 minutes I work off the clock, organizing my shift.
I also wrote: How do you not know, what nurses do at your facility, during a shift.
Told you all, I have a big mouth!
IS THIS GUY NUTS??? Wonder what kind of work he did as an LPN and
for how long! No disrespect for LPN's...but their responsibilities are not
as stringent as an RN who is responsible for everything in the unit. I taught
LPN's. I know what they can and cannot do. Many LPN's know as much or
more, sometimes, from being on the job for many years. But, legally, they
do not have the responsibilities of an RN.
And the DON who says it won't pass ILL, is just sitting on her paycheck!
Make it happen, lady!
On 4/10/2019 at 4:24 PM, traumaRUs said:Just to address this. Here is the site for the IL Nurses Association/ANA
https://www.ana-illinois.org/about-ana-illinois/
"ANA-Illinois, together with our national partner, the American Nurses Association (ANA), will continue to build a community of nurses dedicated to advancing their profession and providing safe, affordable healthcare."
They are actually one organization. And yes, I too got the text messages
The Illinois Nurses Association (INA) is a Nurses Union. Not affiliated with the ANA. We were, but we separated in 2012-and now there is the ANA-IL and the INA.
On 4/10/2019 at 6:54 PM, klone said:I really think that the best solution is, instead of treating patients like widgets with a one-size approach to ratios, the hospital committee approach where the FLOOR NURSES decide what safe staffing looks like, with an acuity-based staffing matrix that looks at the individual patients, rather than simply counting heads. And the law should require this, and provide the enforcement teeth (such as what Oregon has done, sorry to sound like a broken record).
I’m sorry. Our state already has Acuity Based staffing law in place x10 yrs. Hospitals either ignore it or refuse to implement the staffing committees recommendations. The IHA only just now, faced with a ratios bill, wants to “strengthen” it. Again their proposals are weak. No reporting mechanism and only a financial penalty as a last resort. What does that mean? Give the hospital a chance to comply despite noncompliance for 10yrs? Again more rhetoric.
A national survey was completed in October 2018. This article presents the data that was collected from the State of Illinois. The purpose of this article is to show the experiences that bedside nurses are having in Illinois in their hospital staffing practices, as their state has legislation that has been enacted since 2008 called the Nurse Staffing by Patient Acuity Act.
#NursesTakeDC #NursesUnite
https://allnurses.com/illinois-nurse-staffing-survey-t699288/
Absolutely! I have a nurse friend who works at a large city hospital.....it has more than 10 CEOs. EACH receives a million dollars a year in bonuses. Nurses with seniority ....and therefore larger paychecks....are being forced out. Inexperienced nurses are being hired...therefore with smaller paychecks. Never are enough nurses being hired, and as the older nurses leave, the newer nurses lose any mentors they may have had. Dangerous for both patients and nurses. Oh...and, yes, they do have a union.....which does nothing for the nurses and ancillary personnel. The union heads are enjoying nice, big checks, too. The hospital administrators and the union bosses are in bed together.
herring_RN, ASN, BSN
3,651 Posts
In California even the hospitals with greedy dishonest management staff the maximum number allowed by law to every nurse most days.
At one hospital where I went as a registry nurse I witnessed a nurse fill out an ADO. She had others who agreed sign it. Then she called the physician who had ordered Q 30 minuted vital signs, hourly I&O and such to tell him that she was assigned four patients and was to receive his other patient post op from the OR. That doctor told the supervisor, who had been handed the ADO, to get another nurse because his two patients could not safely share their nurse with three other patients. Within 20 minutes another registry nurse arrived.
The link below is from the Michigan Nurses Association. It states " As a patient advocate and in accordance with the Michigan Public Health Code, this is to confirm that I/we have notified you that, in my/our professional judgment, today's assignment is/was potentially unsafe and may place my/our license(s) and patients at risk. As a result, the facility/employer is responsible for any adverse effect on assigned staff and/or patient care. I/We will, under protest, provide care to the best of my/our ability in accordance with professional standards.
http://www.umpnc.org/uploads/2/7/3/0/2730318/ado_forminpt.pdf
Several nurses at that hospital told me that hospital used to use the same idea of staffing by numbers, but since the ratios went into effect that number in med-surg is five patients per nurse. Previously it was seven on days and ten on nights.
Seems even that facility meets the bare numeric number and usually ignores acuity.