Published Dec 11, 2017
JRichmond03
7 Posts
Does anyone have an idea, process, solution, etc to staffing/coverage of the 1:1 safety sitter for suicidal patients?
hppygr8ful, ASN, RN, EMT-I
4 Articles; 5,186 Posts
I don't know what solution you are asking for. I'm a psych nurse and if the patient is not safe due to active suicidality them we sit with them!
Hppy
elkpark
14,633 Posts
I, too, am unsure what you're asking. Everywhere I've worked over many years, whether in psychiatric settings or med-surg settings, individuals who were actively suicidal (or even considered just to be at significant risk) had a 1:1 sitter. The charge nurse and house supervisor worked together to work out the staffing. It hasn't been a big deal.
SouthpawRN
337 Posts
Our facility has sitters that are paid to do just that. If they are actively violent or agressive they will also get a security officer to watch them, sometimes 2 of officers..
We run into staffing issues and getting people to come in to sit with them 1:1. If I have 15 patients and 3 nurses, a patient becomes a 1:1, we pull the nurse to sit with them. Most times we have a tech but then that role need coverage.
Accolay
339 Posts
You have to give more. What's prompting this question? Where I work, it's just a given that these patients will have a 1:1. We find a body, usually someone pulled temporarily then staffed appropriately for the next shift.
NurseSpeedy, ADN, LPN, RN
1,599 Posts
I rarely see an actual 1:1. Not sure how it's even possible, but I have seen up to a 1:4, basically, however many beds they could squeeze in a space and have one person look at them and call it a 1:1. One facility actually removed a wall and made two doubles a quad, had curtains in between the beds, and the sitter in the middle with a view of them all. They tried to do anything, the sitter called for the aide or nurse. Didn't touch the patients. Personally, I think it was a lousy idea and unsafe if the patient really wanted to hurt themselves, but this is what I saw.
jodispamodi
230 Posts
my unit goes by the census. 1-1's are always 1-1.
This would actually be illegal in some states and the facility as well as assigned nursing staff would be held liable if an adverse event occurred. I have a patient who has been on 1:1 for a month. Every time we take the person off 1:1 he/she hurts themselves so back on 1:1 it is.
What does that do to your staffing and getting/finding coverage for that 1:1 24/7 for a month? And staff burnout?
pixierose, BSN, RN
882 Posts
Well, it's illegal and unsafe for that patient NOT to have the continuous 1:1 (within arms length at all times) supervision.
If staff burnout from the 24/month, we rotate from other floors.
If a patient is hell bent on killing/harming themselves, they will find a way. Our job is to ensure the patients safety is maintained at all times. It's sure better than the alternative.
guest52816
473 Posts
When I worked at a psychiatric facility, a doctor's order was needed to obtain a 1:1. Once the order was in place, it was up to the House Supervisor to secure staffing for the 1:1.
More recently, at the acute care hospital I was employed at, again, a doctor's order was needed and staffing was then arranged.