Published
There are many threads on this so there are tons of answers out there! In my reading it seems that it usually doesn't matter. A job may say ANCC certification but it may just be that whoever wrote the job description didn't realize there was another certifying body.
I have seen only a couple of posts that say their employer prefers one over the other....and I've stalked this forum for a while now.
I'm going with AANP as they are an organization that represents NPs and pushes for better conditions for them. (Plus their exam is straight clinical questions basically)
I recently graduated in December and am planning to take AANPCP. I decided AANPCP because it is strictly clinical based questions and has an association with the actual AANP organization. I have classmates taking both, but from the live review I attended, the majority of recent graduates tend to be leaning toward AANPCP.
What is the advantage of taking both exams and maintaining both? Thx
Initially? You get a little insurance in having a fallback exam should you be unsuccessful the first time around. The drawback is this is expensive. I've known 3 people that did this and when it was time to renew their license ended up only holding onto one cert.
Long term? Not much. Both exams are recognized in every state and you would be hard pressed to hear anyone tell you they were discriminated against because of which certification you have. Maintaining both costs twice as much, and both have slightly different requirements for renewal, although AANP is bringing theres to be more similar to ANCC's in a couple of years.
The main benefit of keeping both long term likely boils down to a point of personal pride as there is no real practical reason for doing so. Although I toyed with applying for both when was freaking out about taking my boards, I ended up going with the AANP because it was purely clinical, and I wanted to support the largest full service organization dedicated specifically to NP's of all disciplines.
For family I can't imagine the credential getting retired anytime soon from either body since it still remains the most common certification for NPs in the nation. The only realistic change I could see is one day everyone realizing two different certifying bodies is silly, confusing, and unnecessary, causing them to merge. In that situation regardless of organization you'd be grandfathered in.
Either way, keeping a second certification on board on the off chance that it gets retired AND you get lazy and forget to renew hardly seems worthy to justify keeping both certs.
You're right about costs being covered by many employers, so long as they don't realize they're paying for an extra certification that literally adds nothing to your ability to legally practice.
34years
6 Posts
I'm trying to decide which certification to take. I would like to know if one certification is better than the other. I have heard pro's and con's about both, any feedback would be appreciated