Conscious Sedation by "qualified" persons...
- 0Jun 19, '06 by mommyof2grlsAs an RN, I am having a hard time with this. I came from a hospital that was very by the book, no ambiguous policy's etc. Things were very clear. If you were not atleast an RN, and have ACLS, and a CS class you did not push any form of sedation, narcotic, or any other IV drug for that matter. I have techs giving Benadry, fentanyl, versed, and the list goes on. The unit has recently decided they need to be ACLS certified, but I can think of plenty of nurses who may be ACLS but still have no business pushing sedation.
I have contacted the state boards of nursing, and JCAHO. No one is giving me anything but "qualified persons=ACLS and yearly competency", per each hospitals policy.
Can I get some feed back. I work in IR, and they are very anti RN, i get the feeling the techs think they can do my job! I just feel there is more to giving drugs and monitoring the patient. It goes to the whole system and understanding it as a whole.
Any input either way is greatly appreciated.
- 9,938 Visits
- 0Jun 19, '06 by dianah Senior ModeratorWhat are the area hospitals doing?
What does your Risk Mgmt say?
Check JCAHO's requirements (I think you can access them online).
Check your state's requirements; interpretation of tech and RN scope of practice varies from state to state.
However it is set up, be sure your practice is supported by your P & P, and JCAHO recommendations. And document, document, document.
- 0Jul 8, '06 by ZASHAGALKAQuote from mommyof2grlsOnly PROFESSIONAL nurses in the State of Arkansas can give medications. (Docs can, but only NURSES can do this as an act prescribed by a doc.)JCAHO says "qualified Persons", state board has no stand on it as long as the RN is working withing her/his scope of practice. Risk management, I have no idea. I think if they had a family member on the talbe they would request an RN. I know I would.
Your NPA specifically states, up front, in its definitions:
(6) “Practice of professional nursing” means the performance for compensation of any acts involving:
(A) The observation, care, and counsel of the ill, injured, or infirm;
(B) The maintenance of health or prevention of illness of others;
(C) The supervision and teaching of other personnel;
(D) The delegation of certain nursing practices to other personnel as set forth in regulations established by the board;
(E) The administration of medications and treatments as prescribed by practitioners authorized to prescribe and treat in
accordance with state law where such acts require substantial specialized judgment and skill based on knowledge and
application of the principles of biological, physical, and social sciences;
Sounds to me like your NPA specifically forbids this practice. And in case that isn't clear, your board has clarified this in their rules:
Rules. Chapter 5:
E. NURSING TASKS THAT SHALL NOT BE DELEGATED
By way of example, and not in limitation, the following are nursing tasks that are not within the scope of
sound nursing judgment to delegate:
1. Physical, psychological, and social assessment which requires nursing judgment, intervention,
referral, or follow-up;
2. Formulation of the plan of nursing care and evaluation of the client's response to the care rendered;
3. Specific tasks involved in the implementation of the plan of care which require nursing judgment or
4. The responsibility and accountability for client health teaching and health counseling which
promotes client education and involves the client's significant others in accomplishing health goals; and
5. Administration of any medications or intravenous therapy, including blood or blood products.
6. Receiving or transmitting verbal or telephone orders;
7. Registered nurse practitioners and advanced practice nurses shall not delegate to unlicensed
ancillary staff the calling in of prescriptions to the pharmacy.
CLEARLY, in the state of Arkansas, giving prescribed medications is the act of a PROFESSIONAL NURSE that CANNOT be delegated. It is in fact, a violation of law. I'd point this out to your risk manager. The lawsuit potential for both the nurse that allows this under his/her license, AND the hospital, is astronomical.
If I were a lawyer, and anything adverse happened, I could EASILY prove both an established duty and a failure to meet that duty if anyone but a nurse and/or doc is pushing the IV med that was the proximal cause of the event.
Timothy.Last edit by ZASHAGALKA on Jul 8, '06
- 0Jul 8, '06 by NRSKarenRN Adminposition statement: iv conscious sedation
the arkansas state board of nursing has determined that it is within the scope of practice of aregistered professional nurse to administer pharmacologic agents via the intravenous route to produce conscious sedation. optimal anesthesia care is best provided by qualified
anesthesiologists and certified registered nurse anesthetists. however, the board recognizes that the demand in the practice setting necessitates non-crna rns providing iv conscious sedation. employing facilities should have policies and procedures to guide the registered nurse. the attached guidelines have been adopted by the arkansas state board of nursing.
adopted november, 1994
....endorsed byamerican radiological nurses association
Last edit by NRSKarenRN on Jul 8, '06
- 0Jul 8, '06 by NRSKarenRN Adminprevious post and links:
rad tech's pushing iv narcotics for sedation - allnurses.com ...
- 0Jul 9, '06 by mommyof2grlsWow, thanks for all the informatioin!
I have contacted SBN in Tennessee, where I work. Their response was "qualified persons as stated for each individual hospital policy" JCAHO said the same thing. Both feel that if the hospital wants to say anyone can give CS if they have ACLS, and have taken a 10 question CS test, then that is OK.
I Guess if a physician sees the pt for 20 seconds that counts as well as a thourough nursing assessment, and anyone can give the drugs and monitor.
It is a big territory thing, If I don't do the assressment, I don't push the drugs, If I don't push the drugs I am don't have anything to do with that case. It is not meeting Standards of care issues, but apparentyl they are not worried about giving each patient the same quality of care. :-)
Thank You for the input!!!!
- 0Jul 9, '06 by pickledpepperRNTennessee Practice Acts
Conscious sedation requires constant assessment and possibly need for intervention. That cannot be done by a tech.
The Tennessee rules have causes for discuplinary action against the RN license on page 28 & 29 including (m) Failing to supervise persons to whom nursing functions are delegated or assigned.
ALL states specify or imply that the nurse must do no harm and not allow others to harm their patient.
California policy on CS: