A Nation Of Nonreaders

Nearly half of all adults in America cannot read or comprehend material if it is written at or above the eighth grade level. Many of these functional illiterates and marginal literates are our patients. Some of them are our coworkers. However, the true scope of this problem stays hidden because people who do not read well are very good at masking their poor reading skills. Nurses Announcements Archive Article

I first noticed this serious problem when I was 19 years old and working at a grocery store.

One of my coworkers, a middle-aged mother of three who had been married for 15 years, asked for my assistance with reading and properly completing a time-off request form. "I am not good at writing things," she chimed with a smile on her face. She added, "I forgot my glasses, so I can't see this paper too well today."

While helping her with the form, which was written at a fifth or sixth grade level, I made some silent observations. First of all, this woman was a high school graduate. Moreover, I never saw her wearing eyeglasses during the entire year that I worked with her. Her excuses of being a bad writer and forgetting her glasses were likely intended to mask an awful truth.

My coworker did not know how to read very well.

When I started working as a nurse, I suspected that some of my coworkers lacked basic literacy skills. For instance, a middle-aged nursing assistant with whom I once worked started crying one afternoon several years ago after staring at a letter that had been given to her by the human resources manager. The assistant asked, "What is this paper? Are they going to fire me?"

After glancing at the letter, I determined within a few seconds that it was the same preprinted memo that every employee in the facility had received regarding yearly open enrollment for health insurance. I reassured her and gently told her about the letter's contents, and she thanked me. I also surmised that this woman would have never cried over the memo in the first place if she was comfortable reading the written word.

Many people do not read very well. According to the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy, 63 million adults in the U.S. do not read proficiently enough to comprehend an article written at the eighth grade level and another 30 million people read at or below a fifth grade level. In other words, a whopping 93 million people possess low levels of literacy. This is almost half of all adults in America! However, the true scope of this problem lurks in the shadows because functional illiterates and marginal literates are usually very astute at covering up their poor reading skills.

It's a sad fact of life that many of our patients and some of our coworkers do not read well. For example, a patient who delays signing consent paperwork because he's tired or forgot his glasses (even though he denied wearing eyeglasses during the initial assessment) might be an illiterate. The CNA at the nursing home who procrastinates when asked to write a statement regarding a fall and always requests help from others to complete her flow sheets might be a nonreader. Since many people who do not read are well-dressed, articulate and work in respectable occupations, it is a problem that cannot be detected by simply looking at a person or studying one's demographic information. In addition, people with poor reading skills have spent much of their lives learning creative ways to hide their inadequacies from others.

Low literacy skills can negatively affect patient outcomes. First of all, the marginally literate patient might cheerfully nod, pretend to understand, and simply sign written discharge instructions when he did not comprehend the paperwork. In one case, a patient was given full-sized 8x11 inch papers that were light blue in color and did not realize that these were prescriptions because he could not read them well enough. Some patients are readmitted for the same chronic illnesses repeatedly. While noncompliance might be a major part of these readmissions, one must wonder if these people really understand what we're telling them.

There are no simple solutions to this complex problem. However, nurses can help in small ways by providing clear verbal discharge instructions and taking great care to avoid medical jargon. The nurse should check for understanding by requesting that the patient repeat the instructions in his own words and watch as the patient demonstrates any hands-on skills that he was taught by staff. Patients who are marginally literate can read and comprehend pamphlets if they are written at a sixth grade level.

If you suspect that a subordinate coworker who reports to you is unable to read well, use simple verbal directives, keep explanations short, and ask the person to restate the directions in his/her own words to ensure comprehension. Do not confront the coworker on the alleged inability to read or do anything to embarrass him/her.

Specializes in Oncology.

Just to play devil's advocate:

It's so sad that the US standards in so many vital areas are dropping so fast.

I have to wonder how much of that stuff is really "vital" anymore. Latin, short hand, and Morse Code used to be all the rage. Now they're "dead" languages. The day may come where cursive writing goes the way of the DoDo and why shouldn't it? The need for cursive was to 1) be faster and 2) prevent ink dripping all over from lifting the quill off the page. The age of ball point pens removed half that need, and word processors removed the other. Printing will do just fine.

Take it a little further and the age of computers, phones, etc. may remove the need for writing (ie. actual physical "writing") altogether, given enough time. There's not necessarily anything wrong with that, as long as humans are able to communicate effectively by pushing buttons and being able to interpret the output. *That is where the problem lies - the interpretation part. Standardization is a key component to any successful language - people have to agree on what things mean. Not being able to interpret the output, or create output that others can interpret is where we get into trouble. This is what we need to keep in mind when working with patients and colleagues: can they understand the communication, whether written, verbal, or physical demonstration.

Specializes in Palliative.
It makes me wonder how these people skirted through college-level English courses and managed to receive passing grades.

Some are given mercy passes. Others have a friend who needs them to stay in school to give said friend a ride to school (this may or may not be based on personal experience :p). The question of standards does come to mind as well.

That said, I used to work with an older nurse who was clearly dyslexic. In her day she was simply labeled a "slow learner" and no one really expected much from her. What got her through was pure determination and hard work. She read as much as she could to practice, worked twice as hard as everyone else to complete her education (which those around her told her she was simply incapable of doing) and went on to have an almost 50 year career. She never did read or write well but did well enough.

I was always impressed at her work ethic and her willingness to do what it took to become a nurse, despite the difficulties. Many people in the same situation would have quit and accepted that they were simply too "stupid" to continue. Heck how many people quit with half the obstacles?

Specializes in PCCN.

One word- De-evolution.

Where I work, they tried for a while to let the aides write their own notes in the chart. It made sense, taken at face value. The aides could chart stuff within their scope: behavior observations, food intake, unusual urine/stool output, things like that.

It only lasted a few months.

Tons of incoherent notes. Bizarre sentence structure. Aides who would write two page narrative notes just to describe why Mrs Jones didn't get her shower that shift. And, I swear to God, I saw notes where "cause" was written "cuz", "you" as "u" and other various cell phone text-speaks. It was a hot mess.

I'm convinced that texting is ruining our ability to write with any competence. Writing properly is a "use it or lose it" skill. And many Americans seem to be "losing it" fast.

I totally agree that cursive handwriting has outlived it purpose. It's just an archaic relic. For clarity purposes, we should train kids to have their writing match typed words as much as possible. Who cares if it's not as pretty or individualistic? Clarity and uniformity is the point of writing.

There is little doubt that both literacy and perhaps more importantly, numeracy, have declined significantly in the US over the past decades. While it is convenient to identfy the school system as the culprit, in my opinion, poor parenting is much more to blame. Both my wife and I had parents who read, both of us are avid readers and so perhaps not surprisingly, both our [now grown] children are also fond of reading.

Having a high degree of literacy may not seem related to mathematics, but the ability to understand and reason is enhanced dramatically through literature and I maintain helps to promote a facility with numbers (i. e., numeracy). Of course, reading also builds vocabulary and allows a deeper understanding of grammar and syntax, all of which helps to increase fluency and competence in writing.

Frankly, it is a shame that neither schools nor parents seem to hold reading in very high regard. When I went to high school, we were required to read a wide variety of works ranging from "classic" English writing such as Chaucer, Shakespeare and Marlowe, to more modern works from Hardy, Lawrence, Twain, Dickens, Melville, London, Crane and Hemingway. I can still recite the first few lines of the Canterbury Tales (we had to memorize the first paragraph - in Middle English no less!) and much of Portia's "Quality of Mercy" soliloquy from The Merchant of Venice. I bring this up, not to brag about my education - frankly, it pales in comparison to that of earlier generations - but simply to illustrate how far down we seem to have slid when it comes to appreciating English literature. Poor writing skills really should not be much of a surprise.

Poor spelling is not always an example of illiteracy. I know plenty of well read people who for whatever reason have poor recall when it comes to spelling. . . .

Never trust a man who can only spell a word one way
S. L. Clemons

Readers Digest had an article years ago about a college graduate who admitted he could NOT read. He was adept at getting other people to do things for him. Its a shame a college educated? man should have to admit something like that.

If we consider the number of people who get out of school without being able to proficiently read, which they should be able to do at least by the fifth grade, why do we wonder that taxpayers do not want to keep increasing school taxes when schools cannot seem to accomplish even this minimal task.

Specializes in Case mgmt., rehab, (CRRN), LTC & psych.
If we consider the number of people who get out of school without being able to proficiently read, which they should be able to do at least by the fifth grade, why do we wonder that taxpayers do not want to keep increasing school taxes when schools cannot seem to accomplish even this minimal task.
Schools share some of the blame. I also think that parents shoulder the remainder of the blame for poor literacy and numeracy. After all, there's only so much a schoolteacher can do with an unprepared child.

The foundation for strong literacy and numeracy skills starts in infancy when babies and toddlers are read to, spoken to, and stimulated by their parents. However, masses of parents do not read to their children or help with homework assignments. According to multiple studies, children of undereducated parents have limited vocabularies and do not perform at the same level as kids born to more educated parents. They typically start behind in school and often never catch up without some intense remediation.

Think about it. It's your educated professional households who seek out after-school tutoring, writing classes, music lessons, reading workshops, and other organized activities that inculcate literacy skills and critical thought into the mind of a child with a developing brain.

There's an achievement gap in America, and the kids who were lucky enough to be born to parents who value education are the ones who tend to achieve.

Specializes in Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Surgical.

I agree with the above statement somewhere that college-level students have atrocious writing abilities. I had to practically

re-write my partner's part of a paper in one of our classes due to the generally poor spelling, casual speech, and incoherence

of it all. And the way some of these folks speak as future professionals...:banghead:

Specializes in Med-Surg.

I liked the various suggestions posted to help our marginal readers understand and retain instructions. Still, I feel the need to reach out to non readers and marginal readers, especially coworkers. Reading really is about cracking the code of written language. If a person doesn't "crack the code" while young, and being taught only one way to do it, so many give up and get discouraged. I've seen one-on-one tutoring with literacy volunteers work wonders in my community. How can I help my coworkers in a non-threatening way, without embarrassing way?

Specializes in Psych.

While there is no doubt in my mind that literacy levels are not where it should be, I really question how much they have decreased. Maybe it has just decreased for the anglophone white males, however what about women and ethnic minorities now that education is more accessible for those groups.