Published
If your hospital had one of those new fangled doohickey systems that monitor your handwashing via your badge and an infrared sensor, etc. which department would monitor and report the results? I'm thinking IT, or maybe if it's a big hospital, the specialized infection control department? I'm doing a paper and trying to get an idea of who would (or who is currently) monitoring something like that...Seems like IT would def need to be involved, right? Or am I wrong about that??
Awww, motivating staff to wash their hands between patients is such a nice, productive way for infection control to earn their keep-now they want to take it away from them and give it to a computer....
I think most of the cross-infection that occurs in hospitals is caused by doctors, who are notoriously careless about infection control. As someone previously mentioned, hand wash sensors would be better applied to our dear MDs and surgeons, who think nothing of walking out of theater in their scrubs, going to see a couple of patients in their rooms, then walking straight back into theater.
Ah well, there are definite advantages to living in a country that's about 20 years behind the rest of the world; by the time these sensors reach South Africa, I'll be long since retired
Awww, motivating staff to wash their hands between patients is such a nice, productive way for infection control to earn their keep-now they want to take it away from them and give it to a computer....I think most of the cross-infection that occurs in hospitals is caused by doctors, who are notoriously careless about infection control. As someone previously mentioned, hand wash sensors would be better applied to our dear MDs and surgeons, who think nothing of walking out of theater in their scrubs, going to see a couple of patients in their rooms, then walking straight back into theater.
Ah well, there are definite advantages to living in a country that's about 20 years behind the rest of the world; by the time these sensors reach South Africa, I'll be long since retired
Although I should say that the MD's have been shown in the reports/data to be the biggest perpetrators, after the nurses....But when I was thinking about it, I thought about the fact that this prob has to do with sheer numbers...I think nursing is the most reported because they are the largest group of personnel in a facility.........
I'm guessing HIM people would probably play a role in this somehow, particularly with regard to implementing the system and/or monitoring/evaluating the data. This type of thing has come up several times in my classes.
OP, I thought you might like a link to a thread I started a while ago about a story involving state of the art computer software and devices that can track and evaluate everything from vital signs and hand-washing to emotional responses. The story itself (there's a link to it in my initial post on the thread) is quite interesting and specifically references software that actually breaks in and reminds you about hand-washing if it thinks you've overlooked it. I have some serious reservations about this sort of thing.
https://allnurses.com/nursing-news/technology-evaluates-peoples-523988.html
I'm guessing HIM people would probably play a role in this somehow, particularly with regard to implementing the system and/or monitoring/evaluating the data. This type of thing has come up several times in my classes.OP, I thought you might like a link to a thread I started a while ago about a story involving state of the art computer software and devices that can track and evaluate everything from vital signs and hand-washing to emotional responses. The story itself (there's a link to it in my initial post on the thread) is quite interesting and specifically references software that actually breaks in and reminds you about hand-washing if it thinks you've overlooked it. I have some serious reservations about this sort of thing.
https://allnurses.com/nursing-news/technology-evaluates-peoples-523988.html
Thanks, TDCHIM-I appreciate it very much!
How would they have any idea how long I was in a room? "Oh, we saw you didn't wash your hands for 45 minutes!" Uhm, yeah, I was in with my patient in flash pulm edema that long. Or "We saw you washed your hands every 15 minutes! Good job!" When really they were in 3 patients rooms for 5 minutes each. Do Purell dispensers count?
I'm reading the posts and not sure if your question was totally answered. As someone else stated, the software being utilized would already have been set up by the IT department. However, the collecting of data and inputting it into the database would be the responsibility of the infection control department. They would then tabulate the data to present to administration and any accreditating bodies that would come for a visit, ie JCAHO.
Yes, I know IT is not a clinical department, but how would infection control keep their records, etc? How would infection control setup, maintain, and report a database system that shows all the uses, etc of the monitoring device?
The Infection Control dept where I work monitors handwashing but there is nothing computerized yet; instead, they employ "spies", folks not from infection control, but recruited by them, and they pretend to be working at a computer terminal but they're secretly watching a group of patient rooms.
I'm reading the posts and not sure if your question was totally answered. As someone else stated, the software being utilized would already have been set up by the IT department. However, the collecting of data and inputting it into the database would be the responsibility of the infection control department. They would then tabulate the data to present to administration and any accreditating bodies that would come for a visit, ie JCAHO.
TY, Highland! I was thinking along those lines........
Handwashing is only one element in this spectrum - - how often are the staff cleaning their STETHOSCOPES????
When I had a cardiac cath done last year, people would take their scope from around their neck, listen to my groin site and then wrap that scope around their neck again.
YUCK. I made one doc take off his scope and clean it in front of me.
But what about everyone else? And everyone leans on or over the bedrails.
Hands are only one part of the equasion....
greenfiremajick
685 Posts
I feel the same way about how ridiculous it is to have to be monitored. My most recent assignment is to pick an area that covers JCAHO's standards, guidelines, etc for a specific area such as infection control. I saw a post on here previously, that discussed the new infrared devices being utilized in some facilities and figured I would put these devices in, as a part of that. The most interesting part about them, to me, is that they have to be utilized, at all. I mean how else can a facility ensure handwashing (as well as other) protocols are followed, when it becomes obvious that the workers in the facility are not adhering for whatever reason??
On the other side of that, are the posts I've seen here on AN, that discuss how nurses in the past, or more experienced nurses in the present, seem to think that gloves are silly for everyday type stuff..Or even those reports of nurses having sniffed, or licked their fingers to determine whether has C-diff or some such other issue going on! Wonder how often they washed their hands???
And as far being microchipped....A National Database/Directory has been discussed...Now THAT's CREEPY!!!!