Published
We ROUTINELY use scalp veins on newborns in our nursery. I would think IF needed, they could be in ER on 16 month olds, as well. WHY put a child thru several failed sticks, if one vein is that prominent? Remember, too even though not "scary sick"that baby could have been dehydrated and therefore, peripheral veins harder to cannulate.
That said, protecting ANY IV site on a child that age is a challenge,and I would think a scalp vein, especially so.
I've never heard ANYONE question using scalp veins in a little one. Those little veins are hard enough to find, and when they are in a position that they NEED an IV, it's usually harder.
HOWEVER, rarely does anyone in our hospital do one unless they are a ped's nurse. Most of our nurses think they look so pitiful with one, and "Hate to do that to such a tiny little person". So, rather than try it and not get it perfect the 1st time, they get a ped's nurse in to do it, as they handle them more often.
Interesting point though, had never thought of it.
And BTW, no one has to ask permission to do one.
Dave
Newborns are the only ones I use a scalp vein on. I use a #24 insyte cath in the scalp. I put PICC lines in a newborn's wrist. I use the foot up to Two years of age. I use the two notch veins between the wrist bones on all children as a blind stick, just above a bent down wrist on "chubby " little hands.
It is a good idea to practice these areas of vascular access on your friend or roommates, just look but don't stick. The more you practice finding them, the easier it will be at crunch time.
Barbara, my first certification is CRNI .
Thinking more about this, I will never use a scalp vein at home. If a mom spikes a fever in Labor, the baby is put on 10 days of gent and ampicillin, 7 of which are done at home.
Mom doesn't need to see a scalp vein infiltrate and have the baby's eye become puffy, I always D/c the scalp vein and and put in a peripheral cath.
With a NICU background, I come from the "any port in a storm" school of thought on infant IVs.
Scalp IVs are upsetting (for parents) to look at, especially if they require any shaving. However, from the baby's perspective, they are typically well-tolerated. The veins tend to be a little larger and more resilient than other peripheral sites. And they leave the baby's extremities free. Babies object to having their little extremities restrained. When it is necessary to restrain a hand or arm to protect an IV site, the baby loses out on 2 important means of self comfort, ie sucking and flexed posturing.
wandernsoul
20 Posts
Never had to question this before in all my ER years. Had a 16 month old with persistant vomiting, chunky but nearly bald little girl. As we (another traveler and myself) were looking for IV sites the mom commented on the child's scalp veins, which were quite prominent since she was such a little cueball (a very cute cueball!) After several peripheral attempts that were unsuccessful the other traveler was ready to jump on the scalp vein, or a foot vein. I mentioned that we might need the docs approval (I don't know this hospital's policy). She seemed quite miffed by this but spoke with the doc who was less than anxious to go either route (bear in mind this child had been sick for about 2 hours and not looking "scary sick"). I gave her a Tigan supp. , started giving her sips of Pedialyte, and reported off to the other traveler as my shift was over. I'll find out today what happened. But my question is:
Do any of you use scalp veins in kids? If so, is it policy or requiring an MD order?
Thanks much.
Beck