Published Mar 25, 2014
wedwed11
10 Posts
Good Afternoon all,
I have a question about ethical dilemma and how to solve it,
( you are a nurse-manager on a surgical unit & you are presented with a client who refuse to sign consent for treatment. ) What can you do about it?
SoldierNurse22, BSN, RN
4 Articles; 2,058 Posts
Well, you don't treat them. If they won't consent, you don't treat, and you document as much with witnesses. It's pretty straightfoward.
Ruby Vee, BSN
17 Articles; 14,036 Posts
This sounds like a homework question to me. Where have you looked to find answers?
HouTx, BSN, MSN, EdD
9,051 Posts
It's not an ethical question because this is not a 'gray' area. As licensed professionals, we must adhere to the legal standards. In this case, (assuming an adult, competent client) NO consent = NO treatment. BTW, it is the surgeon's responsibility to obtain consent, nurses only serve as witnesses.
Pangea Reunited, ASN, RN
1,547 Posts
You should never "push" a client to sign a consent, but you can explore why they don't want to consent. Maybe they have misconceptions that the ordering MD can clear up. Their competence should also be determined and a guardian should be appointed, if appropriate.
If the patient is competent and understands the procedure, but still refuses, alternative treatments can be explored. The patient could also be discharged to an appropriate place ...sometimes, it's hospice.
morte, LPN, LVN
7,015 Posts
yeah, I am thinking homework, but also, I am thinking the OP means the general-on-admission consent to treat....which means the patient should get dressed and leave if they won't sign....