Operating Room Nurse: Roles

I have been an Operating Room Nurse since 1995. Previously, I worked in the Operating Room as a LPN/Surgical Technician from 1980-1994. I love working there. I do tire of hearing comments from other nurses that OR nurses don't really do nursing duties. Specialties Operating Room Article

Updated:  

I'm here to set the record straight. I am as much a Registered Nurse (RN) as the next nurse and I do patient care.

Operating Room Nurses assess, diagnose, plan, intervene, and evaluate their patients just like every other nurse. We are responsible for maintaining a sterile environment in the operating room, monitoring the patient during surgery, and coordinating care throughout the process. We are also responsible for making sure the OR team provides the patient with the best care possible.

Let me tell you how.

The RN specializing in Perioperative Nursing practice performs nursing activities in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of the patients' surgical experience. Based on the Standards and Recommended Practices for Perioperative Nursing--A.O.R.N., the operating room nurse provides a continuity of care throughout the perioperative period, using scientific and behavioral practices with the eventual goal of meeting the individual needs of the patient undergoing surgical intervention. This process is dynamic and continuous and requires constant reevaluation of individual nursing practice in the operating room.

Assessment

The patient enters the preoperative area and is assessed by the preoperative RN. The perioperative RN (Circulating Nurse), then interviews the patient with particular emphasis on ensuring the patient has informed consent, has been NPO for at least 6 hrs. prior to surgery, and current medical history to determine any special needs for the care plan.

The perioperative nurse explains to the patient what will happen during the operative phase and tries to alleviate any anxieties the patient and their family may have. The nurse develops a rapport with the patient that enhances the operative experience for the patient by building trust and assuring the patient and the family of the best care possible.

The assessment includes, but is not limited to:

  • Skin color, temperature, and integrity
  • Respiratory status
  • History of conditions that could affect surgical outcomes (I.e. diabetes)
  • Knowledge base related to the planned surgery and complications that could arise
  • NPO status
  • What medications were taken the morning of surgery and the time taken
  • Allergies and what reactions the patient experiences
  • Placement of any metal implants, especially AICD's and pacemakers
  • Time of last chemotherapy or radiation therapies
  • Verification of patient's name and date of birth
  • Checking to verify all medical record numbers match the patient's name band and paperwork

This information is then used to develop the perioperative nursing care plan.

Diagnosis

The nursing diagnosis is written in a manner that helps determine outcomes. Some nursing diagnoses for surgical patients are:

  • Impaired gas exchange related to anesthesia, pain, and surgical procedure
  • Potential for infection related to indwelling catheter and surgical procedure
  • Activity intolerance related to pain
  • Anxiety related to anesthesia, pain, disease, surgical procedure
  • Alteration in nutrition less than body requirements related to NPO status

Planning

Planning the patient's care in the operating room is focused on patient safety. The nurse gathers supplies needed for the procedure according to the surgeon's preference card, positioning equipment, and any special supplies needed as determined by the nurse's assessment and the patient's history. Preparation assures that the nurse will be able to remain in the surgical suite as much as possible to provide care for the patient. The nurse leaving the room is avoided as much as possible, but unforeseen circumstances may require the nurse to leave to obtain equipment or supplies. When the patient is brought to the operating room and transferred to the operating table, patient comfort and safety are the priority. The nurse provides warmed blankets for the patient and applies the safety strap across the patient. The surgeon is called to the OR suite and the "time out" is performed with the patient participating. Items verified in the time out are the patient's name, date of birth, allergies, procedure to be performed, correctness of consent, site marking, if applicable, and any antibiotics to be given within one hour prior to incision. The patient is instructed to take deep breaths before and after anesthesia to maintain oxygen saturation above 95%. Strict aseptic and sterile techniques are maintained throughout the surgical procedure to reduce the risk for postoperative infection. The nurse remains at the bedside during the induction phase and holds the patient's hand to help reduce anxiety. The patient is reassured as needed.

Nursing Intervention

The circulating nurse and the scrub nurse/technician work as a team to protect the sterility of the operative field by maintaining constant surveillance. Any breaks in sterile technique, such as a tear in the surgeon's glove, are remedied immediately.

The nurse provides for patient comfort by placing warm blankets, remaining at the patient's side until anesthesia has been successfully induced and the anesthesia provider releases the care of the patient to the surgical team. At this time a foley catheter will be placed, if indicated, using aseptic technique. The patient will be positioned and all pressure points will be padded to prevent altered skin integrity. The surgical skin prep is then performed aseptically and allowed to dry before placement of the surgical drapes. Fumes from a wet surgical prep can form pockets of gas that have the potential to be ignited by a spark from the electrocautery used in surgery.

Prior to the surgical incision, the anesthesia provider initiates the infusion of the antibiotic ordered by the surgeon. A preincision verification performed by the circulating nurse rechecks the patient's name, the surgical procedure, the site/side of the procedure, the antibiotic infusion has started, and the prep is dry.

Evaluation

The circulating nurse monitors the patient vigilantly during the course of the perioperative phase which includes preoperative, operative, and postoperative stages of surgery. He/she is responsible for the smooth transition for the patient between these phases. Evaluation of the patient's response to the surgical intervention is ongoing and continuous. Have the surgical outcomes been met? If not, reassessment takes place to plan further.

Conclusion

The patient under anesthesia is totally dependent on the surgical team for their well-being. The perioperative nurse advocates for the patient. He/she is their voice during the surgical intervention.

Whether scrubbing, circulating, or supervising other team members, the perioperative nurse is always aware of the total environment, as well as the patient's reaction to the environment and the care given during all three phases of surgical intervention. The perioperative nurse is knowledgeable about aseptic technique, patient safety, legal aspects of nursing, and management of nursing activities associated with the specific surgical procedure being performed. OR nursing is unique: it provides a specialty service during the perioperative period that stresses the need for continuity of care and respect for the individuality of the patient's needs.

More Information

Operating Room / Perioperative Nursing

What it's Like to be an Operating Room Nurse

 

Im a new RN. how do you become a OR nurse? is there a special training? or other requirments?

1 Votes
Specializes in OR, ER, Med-Surg, ICU, CCU, Home Health.

Check at your hospital to see if they have a nurse residency program for the OR. Many hospitals require at least 1 yr of experience if not 2. AORN offers a perioperative course. Check their website. http://www.aorn.org Good luck!

I think the OP significantly overstates the patient assessment and intervention done by OR circulators. I spent a year as a SRNA and, believe me, it is the CRNAs who have that major role. The surgeons do the surgery, the CRNA takes care of the patient, the scrub techs hand off instruments and supplies to the surgeons, and the circulators do something else. I think they take care of the environment--assuring that everything goes smoothly. The OR is like an alien world, and the OR RN assures safe passage for the patient. They are keeping track of the big picture. They have to know everything about the big picture that can go wrong, how to prevent it and what to do if the **** hits the fan.

The CRNA monitors all the vital signs, gives meds, intubate, oxygenate, etc., etc. including induction, maitenance and emergence from anesthesia. The OR RN doesn't write a vital sign down nor track any of that during the surgery. They assure proper and functioning equipment, supplies, assist with positioning at the beginning and throughout the case. You can say 'go-fer' but that's insulting and incorrect. The OR RN is not sterile and not doing the second-by-second monitoring of the pts condition, so is free to be able to move around the room and leave the room to get things, etc.

I wouldn't like to have a non-RN keeping track of the big picture during my surgery.

All I know is that everyone in the room was aware when there was a newbie or an incompetent circulator running the room. It affected everyone else. All the roles are necessary in the OR. It is sort of like being a coordinator. Assuring that things run smoothly. The CRNA, scrub, and surgeon are very very focused on their own thing during surgery--the OR RN is free from that, but does what no one else can do--pay attention to the big picture.

What they do is important. The best OR RNs might look like they are doing nothing, but that is because they have it all under control.

For sure, it is a unique specialty in nursing. The OR nurse doesn't need to do much of the hands-on patient things. Someone else is doing them. No one develops much rapport with the pt--the contact is too short-term. The pt is usually asleep and if not, the CRNA is at the pts head doing the talking, touching, reassuring etc. No, it is not like bedside nursing--that kind of nursing is for the bedside. The OR calls for caring for the patient in another way--but it is just as much nursing.

1 Votes
Specializes in CRNA, Finally retired.
ILoveRatties said:
I think the OP significantly overstates the patient assessment and intervention done by OR circulators. I spent a year as a SRNA and, believe me, it is the CRNAs who have that major role. The surgeons do the surgery, the CRNA takes care of the patient, the scrub techs hand off instruments and supplies to the surgeons, and the circulators do something else. I think they take care of the environment--assuring that everything goes smoothly. The OR is like an alien world, and the OR RN assures safe passage for the patient. They are keeping track of the big picture. They have to know everything about the big picture that can go wrong, how to prevent it and what to do if the **** hits the fan.

The CRNA monitors all the vital signs, gives meds, intubate, oxygenate, etc., etc. including induction, maitenance and emergence from anesthesia. The OR RN doesn't write a vital sign down nor track any of that during the surgery. They assure proper and functioning equipment, supplies, assist with positioning at the beginning and throughout the case. You can say 'go-fer' but that's insulting and incorrect. The OR RN is not sterile and not doing the second-by-second monitoring of the pts condition, so is free to be able to move around the room and leave the room to get things, etc.

I wouldn't like to have a non-RN keeping track of the big picture during my surgery.

All I know is that everyone in the room was aware when there was a newbie or an incompetent circulator running the room. It affected everyone else. All the roles are necessary in the OR. It is sort of like being a coordinator. Assuring that things run smoothly. The CRNA, scrub, and surgeon are very very focused on their own thing during surgery--the OR RN is free from that, but does what no one else can do--pay attention to the big picture.

What they do is important. The best OR RNs might look like they are doing nothing, but that is because they have it all under control.

For sure, it is a unique specialty in nursing. The OR nurse doesn't need to do much of the hands-on patient things. Someone else is doing them. No one develops much rapport with the pt--the contact is too short-term. The pt is usually asleep and if not, the CRNA is at the pts head doing the talking, touching, reassuring etc. No, it is not like bedside nursing--that kind of nursing is for the bedside. The OR calls for caring for the patient in another way--but it is just as much nursing.

What exactly is it that you believe constitutes nursing. What skills SPECIFIC TO NURSING are they using? I don't think its an insult to nursing that RN's are not be best people for the OR. I don't believe that we have anyone who is the best person for that job. RN's should be taking care of PATIENTS - not surgeons, VCR's, running to pyxis, filling forms, etc. We do need SMART people to do the job and people who can work under pressure, but do they have to go through the system that we've designated as "nursing education?" I think we need a new type of practitioner to work in the OR with a different education than other RN's have. Been in the OR almost 30 years and think that we need to rethink OR nursing. Its way too expensive for the employers to be training the provider. They should come out of school up and running immediately - not a year later.

1 Votes
Specializes in Med Surg, ICU, Perioperative.
Jeffthenurse said:
Thank you for a well written, informative, thorough article. I still feel however, that OR nurses are overqualified for the position. Any nurse would be overqualified. The patients are only in the OR for a short time, informed consent, NPO status, the chart, tests, have already been checked several times up on the unit, and "the nurse develops a rapport!!", yeah, for about 2 minutes! Most of the assessment part involves being a last second secretary. Diagnosis? The care plan has already been written up on the unit; education will be done on the unit----the patient isn't going to remember much about whatever you will teach them. ...."Holds the patient's hand to comfort them...", aaawww, you really need a BSN for that! I feel different about nurses in the recovery room. They're often Critical-Care nurses. I'm speaking from being a patient and from 33 years of nursing experience. It's just my opinion and I thank you again for your article.

I plan to discuss this again on my radio show on an AM station in Philadelphia, PA in the future. I just never saw the need for a Registered Nurse in the operating room. Often, you're just a gofer.

Hey Jeff, here's a great "gofer" scenario for you. Female patient, age 60 with diabetes, HTN and CAD that goes in the O.R. for excision of a bladder tumor. The surgeons get in there, lacerate an artery towards the end of the case and the patient commences to bleed out fast. The surgeons are frantically trying to find the bleeder, anesthesia is frantically opening up the fluids, calling for volume expanders and trying to keep the blood pressure down. The circulator is getting blood products, volume expanders, setting up extra suction and throwing multiple lap sponges on the sterile field. The surgeons proceed to stuff a bunch of laps into the patient's abdomen. They couldn't tell how many they put in there. After things calm down the surgeons remove the laps and just want to close her up as quickly as possible. The circulator is finishing the 125 lap sponge count and comes up one short. The circulator checks again (including all trash cans in the room) as the surgeons are rapidly closing fascia. Still one lap sponge short. Circulator tells the surgeon and receives a snippy comment about not counting correctly. The scrub team checks around the sterile field and back table for the missing sponge. The count is done one more time and still one lap sponge short. The circulator suggests a KUB to check the abdomen before closing the patient and the surgeon refuses, again stating that the circulator is wrong. The circulator says the lap sponge count is incorrect and will document in the perioperative record the incorrect count as well as the surgeon's refusal to consider a KUB. The surgeon pauses, orders the KUB and... low and behold.... the lap sponge tape was seen in the patient's abdomen on the film. The surgeons then opened up the fascia, pulled out the missing sponge and closed her. Had the circulator caved in to an arrogant surgeon, the patient would have suffered a sentinel event of a retained sponge requiring another surgery. In this scenario, the perioperative RN circulator had the authority to document in the patient's record without cosignature because of independent licensure. That made the surgeon think twice about closing the patient and sending her to PACU with an incorrect sponge count. Patient care technicians are not licensed independently. If they worked in the O.R. as primary circulators, who is going to cosign their documentation? Anesthesia? The surgeon? Better yet, would a patient care tech have the balls to stand up to an arrogant surgeon to protect a patient? So, if RN's are too "overqualified" to be in the perioperative suite, why are we still there? Perioperative RN's are in the O.R. because the O.R. team and the patient needs us. This is only one of many scenarios I've experienced in the O.R. as a circulator. Your flippant "gofer" comment shows that you really don't have any idea what we do.

1 Votes

Thanks for all the info. I've always been interested in the OR.

1 Votes
Specializes in OR, Nursing Professional Development.
subee said:
What exactly is it that you believe constitutes nursing. What skills SPECIFIC TO NURSING are they using? I don't think its an insult to nursing that RN's are not be best people for the OR. I don't believe that we have anyone who is the best person for that job. RN's should be taking care of PATIENTS - not surgeons, VCR's, running to pyxis, filling forms, etc. We do need SMART people to do the job and people who can work under pressure, but do they have to go through the system that we've designated as "nursing education?" I think we need a new type of practitioner to work in the OR with a different education than other RN's have. Been in the OR almost 30 years and think that we need to rethink OR nursing. Its way too expensive for the employers to be training the provider. They should come out of school up and running immediately - not a year later.

So if you don't think nurses should be in the OR why are you there?

Also, my hospital's critical care orientation is six months. Should RNs not work there because they aren't ready to right out of school?

1 Votes
Specializes in Anesthesia and Critical Care.

I have to say, it is always interesting what lengths nurses will go to to simply invalidate the professional roles of other nurses. I have been an RN for over 25 years. The first 8 years as a critical care RN and the last 17 years as a private practice CRNA. I hold a MSN and am completing a doctoral degree in Nursing. I would never advocate having a non-RN in the role of the circulating nurse. Those of you who disagree simply do not understand the OR...your ignorance is a powerful seductress. It can make you believe any avenue or path your mind takes you down.

Suffice it to say, that after 17 years of working all hours of the day and night in the OR without an anesthesiologist (and for those of you out there that don't realize CRNAs practice without an anesthesiologist, surprise...there has never been a law that requires it...we are educated to independently select, administer, and manage all types of anesthesia), I WANT and DEMAND an RN by my side as I care for my anesthetized, intra-operative patient. RNs can assess, intervene, and evaluate in all situations...I believe that CSTs and SAs are all wonderful professionals in the OR setting, but only RNs possess the required education and experience to help me when the going gets tough. And as far as being up and ready to work the OR upon graduation...no nurse should be able to do anything independently upon graduation. That's ludicrous...that is why we have orientation/preceptor programs out there. I challenge anyone to TRUTHFULLY say they were ready to jump right into their first job after graduation without the help of a more seasoned nurse. Critical care, OR, ER, med/surg floor, OB, dialysis, occupational health, home health...they all require orientation to familiarize the RN with the accepted practice in that area...school teaches generalized care and theory, but not specific workplace clinical practice...that's what orientation is for. I don't even like a new grad who comes in acting like they can do it all...they simply do not have the necessary experience or bag of tricks to pull from yet, and they usually make serious mistakes.

I suggest the rest of you out there that have only briefly worked the OR (or have never worked the OR) stop professionally bashing your peers and begin to stand united as NURSES...that's how medicine has gotten as far as it has...physicians stand united as a group...wake up folks...we nurses seem to spend more time being petty, trying to whine about who is better than who...it's self destructive. We are nurses and should stand proud TOGETHER. Ignore the "jeffthenurse"s out there that have all but left the profession for whatever reason...they are not worth it...they feed off others' frustration.

Let's strike a blow for nurses supporting nurses huh?

1 Votes
Specializes in Critical Care.

Couldn't agree more. Well said.:yeah: I am so sick of us nurses throwing each other under the administrative/MD bus. We have enough to deal with without turning on each other! If we stuck together we could change the system in a myriad of positive ways, but instead we always fall for that 'ol divide and conqour routne. It is a shame.

That said,I have a quick question. I have ten years of critical care experiencce (all types) , and have had various applications in for an OR position for a while now. These postings have been there for over a month, but no one has called me for an interview. Is it absolutely necessary to hire on in a hospital to get in the system, then transfer to the OR? I am highly motivated with a strong CV and great references, but I can't get anyone to call me. What gives? Is there a certification I could be completing in the meanwhile to up my chances of being given an opportunity to learn the ropes in an OR environment?

1 Votes
Specializes in CRNA, Finally retired.
shisalion said:
Hey Jeff, here's a great "gofer" scenario for you. Female patient, age 60 with diabetes, HTN and CAD that goes in the O.R. for excision of a bladder tumor. The surgeons get in there, lacerate an artery towards the end of the case and the patient commences to bleed out fast. The surgeons are frantically trying to find the bleeder, anesthesia is frantically opening up the fluids, calling for volume expanders and trying to keep the blood pressure down. The circulator is getting blood products, volume expanders, setting up extra suction and throwing multiple lap sponges on the sterile field. The surgeons proceed to stuff a bunch of laps into the patient's abdomen. They couldn't tell how many they put in there. After things calm down the surgeons remove the laps and just want to close her up as quickly as possible. The circulator is finishing the 125 lap sponge count and comes up one short. The circulator checks again (including all trash cans in the room) as the surgeons are rapidly closing fascia. Still one lap sponge short. Circulator tells the surgeon and receives a snippy comment about not counting correctly. The scrub team checks around the sterile field and back table for the missing sponge. The count is done one more time and still one lap sponge short. The circulator suggests a KUB to check the abdomen before closing the patient and the surgeon refuses, again stating that the circulator is wrong. The circulator says the lap sponge count is incorrect and will document in the perioperative record the incorrect count as well as the surgeon's refusal to consider a KUB. The surgeon pauses, orders the KUB and... low and behold.... the lap sponge tape was seen in the patient's abdomen on the film. The surgeons then opened up the fascia, pulled out the missing sponge and closed her. Had the circulator caved in to an arrogant surgeon, the patient would have suffered a sentinel event of a retained sponge requiring another surgery. In this scenario, the perioperative RN circulator had the authority to document in the patient's record without cosignature because of independent licensure. That made the surgeon think twice about closing the patient and sending her to PACU with an incorrect sponge count. Patient care technicians are not licensed independently. If they worked in the O.R. as primary circulators, who is going to cosign their documentation? Anesthesia? The surgeon? Better yet, would a patient care tech have the balls to stand up to an arrogant surgeon to protect a patient? So, if RN's are too "overqualified" to be in the perioperative suite, why are we still there? Perioperative RN's are in the O.R. because the O.R. team and the patient needs us. This is only one of many scenarios I've experienced in the O.R. as a circulator. Your flippant "gofer" comment shows that you really don't have any idea what we do.

Everyone's emotions are getting in the way here. I'm not a circulator and I can count. No one is suggesting that a PCT become a circulator. I'm suggesting that we need ANOTHER KIND OF "NURSE"!!!!!!!!!! Perhaps a new kind of nurse with a new kind of license. For arguments sake, call this person an ORN (Operating Room Nurse). Yes, everything the circulator does is important and I'm NOT PUTTING DOWN WHAT YOU DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am actually saying (anyone listening?) that the job is TOO IMPORTANT TO BE LEFT TO RN's who have NO training in the OR. I am, however, implying that the educational paradigm for the OR is more training skewed than the education of an RN. To the CRNA who replied to this thread; yes a pair of "trained" hands are vital but I prefer that that person learn about cricoid pressure in an academic setting, not on the job. Mechanics can learn on the job - I prefer my health care providers to have an education in the PARTICULAR SKILL SET that they do before they come to work. By the way, I'm not the person who made the gofer comment so don't flame on me. There are surgical tech programs that are two years in length. Now, compare that to the RN who has two years of community college almost everything they studied (with the exception of microbiology) has no TRUE applicability to the OR. Maybe that two year tech program could be redesigned for a person who could scrub and circulate. Do you need do have RN behind your name to count pads, deal with arrogant surgeon? I know LOTS of RN's who were really good at caving in. Certainly I was when I was young. Having RN behind my name had NOTHING to do with becoming more assertive. I work with plenty of appropriately assertive techs.

'

Specializes in OR, Nursing Professional Development.
subee said:
Everyone's emotions are getting in the way here. I'm not a circulator and I can count. No one is suggesting that a PCT become a circulator. I'm suggesting that we need ANOTHER KIND OF "NURSE"!!!!!!!!!! Perhaps a new kind of nurse with a new kind of license. For arguments sake, call this person an ORN (Operating Room Nurse). Yes, everything the circulator does is important and I'm NOT PUTTING DOWN WHAT YOU DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am actually saying (anyone listening?) that the job is TOO IMPORTANT TO BE LEFT TO RN's who have NO training in the OR. I am, however, implying that the educational paradigm for the OR is more training skewed than the education of an RN. To the CRNA who replied to this thread; yes a pair of "trained" hands are vital but I prefer that that person learn about cricoid pressure in an academic setting, not on the job. Mechanics can learn on the job - I prefer my health care providers to have an education in the PARTICULAR SKILL SET that they do before they come to work. By the way, I'm not the person who made the gofer comment so don't flame on me. There are surgical tech programs that are two years in length. Now, compare that to the RN who has two years of community college almost everything they studied (with the exception of microbiology) has no TRUE applicability to the OR. Maybe that two year tech program could be redesigned for a person who could scrub and circulate. Do you need do have RN behind your name to count pads, deal with arrogant surgeon? I know LOTS of RN's who were really good at caving in. Certainly I was when I was young. Having RN behind my name had NOTHING to do with becoming more assertive. I work with plenty of appropriately assertive techs.

But using the argument that OR RNs should have their own education program could make a case that every specialty should have its own education program. How much exposure do most students get to ER nursing? I had 2 days. I also only had 2 days in L&D. So before anyone gets exposure to any type of nursing, they should have to know which specialty they want to work in and apply to that program. And then if that argument gets made, nurses lose their flexibility to change specialties for any reason- burnout, family obligations, flexible schedules, etc. which is probably why some people even go into nursing.

1 Votes

TY for all the excellent info. Very informative and helpful. As someone interested in this field I am so grateful for the breakdown of all you do.

1 Votes