I came across this is little story today, it's not breaking news. I suspect that a member of the housekeeping staff knows something about the bomb threat that required the sweep for weapons.
According to police in Secaucus, the bomb threat — which later was determined to be bogus — was called in to Hudson Regional Hospital on July 18. During a search, bomb detection dogs led investigators to an unlocked office closet containing dozens of firearms.
Among the weapons were 11 handguns and 27 rifles or shotguns, according to police. The closet also contained a .45 caliber semi-automatic rifle with a high-capacity magazine that was determined to be an assault rifle, and a 14-round high-capacity handgun magazine.
The arrested the guy the next day.
What the heck do you think this guy was doing? It sounds very ominous that he was keeping those weapons there.
As most of you know, I listen to or watch congressional hearings as I putter around my cabin. I wanted to offer up this clip of Representative Gaetz offering Chinese propaganda for the congressional record because his thinking was directly influenced by their lies. These republican led hearings are a real source of entertainment but not much serious inquiry.
Now you're an expert on what other members know? You could well be the expert on knee jerk commenting.
I'm an expert on weak liberals and their emotion based reactions to everything.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
MaybeeRN said:
Much like the data you post. Are you a data troll?
You have a problem with data while also spouting right wing rhetoric and vitriol... good for you. Is there anything of value that you would like to bring to the thread?
Right, given the history of your remarks it seems unlikely, doesn't it?
As most of you know, I listen to or watch congressional hearings as I putter around my cabin. I wanted to offer up this clip of Representative Gaetz offering Chinese propaganda for the congressional record because his thinking was directly influenced by their lies. These republican led hearings are a real source of entertainment but not much serious inquiry.
Now you're an expert on what other members know? You could well be the expert on knee jerk commenting.
Apparently you are an expert on people being "offended" when they have not indicated they were "offended".
You just referenced cnn. It makes sense now the media you consume.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
MaybeeRN said:
I'm an expert on weak liberals and their emotion based reactions to everything.
Let's put expert in quotes shall we? You don't actually know much about liberals as evidenced by the content of your remarks. You are, however, expert in the right wing vitriol and animus describing liberals. Your comments reflect that pretty clearly.
Once again you seem to not recognize that the comment that offends you was directed at another member who engages in the tactics used by internet trolls.
What are the tactics of internet trolls? Have a resource for that?
What is it when a person who doesn't agree with someone and calls them a troll?
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Roitrn said:
Apparently you are an expert on people being "offended" when they have not indicated they were "offended".
You just referenced cnn. It makes sense now the media you consume.
You weren't offended? Unfortunately your complaints about my comments to other members paints you that way. Maybe you could change the tone of your remarks?
I guess you have a problem with that video clip... or maybe you didn't watch it because it was posted by CNN. You certainly don't appear to have anything to say about Gaetz sources or discernment.
It's kind of amusing that you are more concerned with calling CNN biased than you are with a republican legislator forming his opinions based upon Chinese propaganda. At least it gives you the opportunity to try to imply that CNN is my preferred media... although one would have to ignore the abundant evidence that it is not.
Let's put expert in quotes shall we? You don't actually know much about liberals as evidenced by the content of your remarks. You are, however, expert in the right wing vitriol and animus describing liberals. Your comments reflect that pretty clearly.
Pretty sure the member doesn't actually think they are an expert on weak liberals and such.
Sure. This member often has short comments and snips in their post. Straight to the point. Instead of trying to make degrading comments disguised as intellectual discourse in long winded post that deflect every which way. Usually to Fox news and Trump.
I wouldn't say the same things in the way this member does but it serves as a entertaining addition from the obvious liberal majority on this thread.
You weren't offended? Unfortunately your complaints about my comments to other members paints you that way. Maybe you could change the tone of your remarks?
I guess you have a problem with that video clip... or maybe you didn't watch it because it was posted by CNN. You certainly don't appear to have anything to say about Gaetz sources or discernment.
It's kind of amusing that you are more concerned with calling CNN biased than you are with a republican legislator forming his opinions based upon Chinese propaganda. At least it gives you the opportunity to try to imply that CNN is my preferred media... although one would have to ignore the abundant evidence that it is not.
You do you.
No. Not offended at all.
Right. It's perfectly acceptable to imply Fox as members "preferred media". But not you and cnn?
I'll watch it on a less bias media source. Not CNN. You can watch CNN and let us know.
You have a problem with data while also spouting right wing rhetoric and vitriol... good for you. Is there anything of value that you would like to bring to the thread?
Right, given the history of your remarks it seems unlikely, doesn't it?
The problem is you don't provide any data to support your arguments. Yet you demand it from everyone else. When be it doesn't fit the narrative it's right wing talking points.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Roitrn said:
What are the tactics of internet trolls? Have a resource for that?
What is it when a person who doesn't agree with someone and calls them a troll?
Are you new to this internet thing and just have never heard of internet trolls or are you just looking for an argument?
As a side note, did you know that an individual's ignorance about a topic is generally only evidence of that ignorance and perhaps evidence of some behavior that prolongs the ignorance intentionally.
toomuchbaloney
16,216 Posts
Yes. My discernment is intact. Your comments generally have no value beyond animus and partisan agitation... in my opinion.